by
Mpelos on 2013-07-01 12:58 CET
The fact that this Gruul deck is midrange didnt bother any1 to fix dem name?:P
by
___ on 2013-07-01 14:01 CET
seems like domri naya without white.
why the 2-2 split on wolfir and thundermaw?
Isn't 4x thundermaw just better, especially in a deck with domri.
by
Thelemys on 2013-07-01 17:28 CET
Isn't a 8/8 body perfect for "fighting" with Domri?
by
Kabelis on 2013-07-01 19:34 CET
Calling any deck with burning tree emissaries (unless they are used for some kind of combo) and strangleroot geists midrange is probably wrong :P
At the same time Gruul Aggro could easily be interpreted as monored splashing green...
Seems like there's no commonly agreed upon way in the community to separate:
1) super aggro decks which run maybe four 4-drops max.
2) "big" aggro decks which run an aggressive creature suit, but still have a good lategame with PWs/Thundermaws etc.
3) true midrange decks like Jund as well as various naya builds which run resto angel + tusk + farseek and aren't really aggressive.
by
___ on 2013-07-01 19:42 CET
@thelemys
lol how many times in your life, while using domri's -2, do you notice the difference bewtween a 5/5 and an 8/8?
by
derflippi on 2013-07-01 21:02 CET
Ask my Scaled Wurm.
by
___ on 2013-07-01 21:52 CET
That's what she said.
But maybe she wasn't really a she.
by
Se3n on 2013-07-02 02:56 CET
Fighting Boros Reckoner with an 8/8 seems way better than with a 5/5. But I could be wrong.
by
on 2013-07-02 05:48 CET
I, personally, like 8/8 more than 5/5 ;-)
by
Canabiest on 2013-07-02 13:12 CET
The hastey part of the 8/8 is just 4/4 though and without evasion.
by
BIRDYYY on 2013-07-02 15:05 CET
I am mad hyppedd about silverheart winning this. Insane card has won me countlessss games last format.
by
thedarkness on 2013-07-04 05:17 CET
There are a lot of Thundermaw Hellkites in the top 2 places.