by Mpelos on 2013-07-01 12:58 CET

The fact that this Gruul deck is midrange didnt bother any1 to fix dem name?:P

by ___ on 2013-07-01 14:01 CET

seems like domri naya without white.
why the 2-2 split on wolfir and thundermaw?
Isn't 4x thundermaw just better, especially in a deck with domri.

by Thelemys on 2013-07-01 17:28 CET

Isn't a 8/8 body perfect for "fighting" with Domri?

by Kabelis on 2013-07-01 19:34 CET

Calling any deck with burning tree emissaries (unless they are used for some kind of combo) and strangleroot geists midrange is probably wrong :P
At the same time Gruul Aggro could easily be interpreted as monored splashing green...

Seems like there's no commonly agreed upon way in the community to separate:
1) super aggro decks which run maybe four 4-drops max.
2) "big" aggro decks which run an aggressive creature suit, but still have a good lategame with PWs/Thundermaws etc.
3) true midrange decks like Jund as well as various naya builds which run resto angel + tusk + farseek and aren't really aggressive.

by ___ on 2013-07-01 19:42 CET

@thelemys
lol how many times in your life, while using domri's -2, do you notice the difference bewtween a 5/5 and an 8/8?

by derflippi on 2013-07-01 21:02 CET

Ask my Scaled Wurm.

by ___ on 2013-07-01 21:52 CET

That's what she said.

But maybe she wasn't really a she.

by Se3n on 2013-07-02 02:56 CET

Fighting Boros Reckoner with an 8/8 seems way better than with a 5/5. But I could be wrong.

by on 2013-07-02 05:48 CET

I, personally, like 8/8 more than 5/5 ;-)

by Canabiest on 2013-07-02 13:12 CET

The hastey part of the 8/8 is just 4/4 though and without evasion.

by BIRDYYY on 2013-07-02 15:05 CET

I am mad hyppedd about silverheart winning this. Insane card has won me countlessss games last format.

by thedarkness on 2013-07-04 05:17 CET

There are a lot of Thundermaw Hellkites in the top 2 places.