| Author |
Message |
Topic: VERY Evil deck >=) |
ACM
Replies: 13
Views: 1106
|
Forum: Casual or Other Decks Posted: Thu Aug 20, 2009 9:43 am Subject: VERY Evil deck >=) |
| That will disturb the balance of lands and nonlands, Vedrfolner's calculations were for a 60-card deck, so you should take out 5 cards for the 5 lands. |
Topic: Two quick questions re combat resolution situations |
ACM
Replies: 2
Views: 426
|
Forum: Magic Rulings Posted: Wed Aug 19, 2009 10:30 pm Subject: Two quick questions re combat resolution situations |
| Situation 1: This will not work, since all combat damage is dealt at once (barring things like first strike and double strike), meaning that after combat damage has been assigned and dealt, both of th ... |
Topic: more noob questions |
ACM
Replies: 4
Views: 534
|
Forum: Magic Rulings Posted: Tue Aug 18, 2009 11:54 pm Subject: more noob questions |
To make things a bit more clear:
1) As soon as you play Path targetting it, a trigger hits the stack telling someone to sacrifice the creature that had been Mannequinned. After this has happened, t ... |
Topic: Combat stack. |
ACM
Replies: 16
Views: 985
|
Forum: Magic Rulings Posted: Tue Aug 18, 2009 2:37 am Subject: Combat stack. |
| Everytime the topmost object on the stack resolves, both players receive priority, and a spell is not countered upon resolution before it actually tries to resolve and finds out its targets are illega ... |
Topic: Sphinx Ambassador and basic land types |
ACM
Replies: 4
Views: 575
|
Forum: Magic Rulings Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2009 2:17 pm Subject: Sphinx Ambassador and basic land types |
| Dumb, yes. Illegal? Nope. |
Topic: Giant Growth |
ACM
Replies: 2
Views: 472
|
Forum: Magic Rulings Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2009 5:55 am Subject: Giant Growth |
| You cannot play it in response to it being declared a blocker. Declaring attackers and blockers is done respectively in the declare attackers step and declare blockers step, and does not use the stack ... |
Topic: Path to exile Question |
ACM
Replies: 12
Views: 766
|
Forum: Magic Rulings Posted: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:39 am Subject: Path to exile Question |
| It works the same way - if you destroy a creature that has already been declared as a blocker, the creature it blocked remains blocked, and will not assign and deal any combat damage, unless there wer ... |
Topic: Vampiric Pact [WB] |
ACM
Replies: 5
Views: 771
|
Forum: Extended (1.x) Decks Posted: Mon Jul 20, 2009 3:38 am Subject: Vampiric Pact [WB] |
| Proclamation of Rebirth. |
Topic: questions about tournaments i cant find answers too |
ACM
Replies: 6
Views: 690
|
Forum: Magic-League Tournaments Posted: Tue Jul 07, 2009 9:22 am Subject: questions about tournaments i cant find answers too |
Blitzer2k7: Tournaments are not set up for any specific playing application, players are however responsible of agreeing on a playing application and mws happens to be the by far most used one.
Edi ... |
Topic: M10 Source |
ACM
Replies: 9
Views: 3828
|
Forum: Magic Workstation (MWS) Posted: Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:14 am Subject: M10 Source |
| Alright, I will send myself a big shipment of fail then, and advice you to download the patch from MTGSalvation. |
Topic: Hamachi & Direct IP Gaming MtG Unrestricted and all ! |
ACM
Replies: 8
Views: 925
|
Forum: General Magic-League Issues Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 4:55 am Subject: Hamachi & Direct IP Gaming MtG Unrestricted and all ! |
| loccothan: You are aware that you are posting this on the forums of a league where Magic is played online? |
Topic: priority |
ACM
Replies: 2
Views: 370
|
Forum: Magic Rulings Posted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 1:10 pm Subject: priority |
| Indeed, if he lets Sculler's second trigger resolve, he won't receive priority until after you have played the Lavalanche, and it is on the stack. |
Topic: Exotic Orchard |
ACM
Replies: 4
Views: 484
|
Forum: Magic Rulings Posted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 3:33 am Subject: Exotic Orchard |
| Just because there are two in play, they won't magically start making mana off of each other. |
Topic: RG aggro critique. |
ACM
Replies: 13
Views: 1349
|
Forum: Standard (T2) Decks Posted: Thu Jun 11, 2009 3:05 pm Subject: RG aggro critique. |
I honestly want to go on a rant when someone suggests taking out Flame Javelins from red-based aggro decks, and then proceeds to add Violent Outbursts...
Flame Javelin is a key component to any red ... |
Topic: Ala Ala Cfx 4-3-2-2 No 11. |
ACM
Replies: 4
Views: 568
|
Forum: Limited Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2009 4:00 am Subject: Ala Ala Cfx 4-3-2-2 No 11. |
As Ludz said, Salvage Titan was definitely the pick there. Recurrable Craw Wurm is always nice  |
| |