|
|
| Author |
Message |
moyo83
Joined: 29 Apr 2008 Posts: 11
|
Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2008 7:09 am Post subject: U-G merfolk |
|
|
Any suggestions or opinions?
Last edited by moyo83 on Fri Jul 25, 2008 6:07 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CMA-Flippi Administrator
Joined: 19 Mar 2005 Posts: 537 Location: Weiterstad
|
Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2008 7:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
| moved to Casual & Other decks - please read Forum rules. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
moyo83
Joined: 29 Apr 2008 Posts: 11
|
Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2008 7:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Why moved to casual? this is a standard deck |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Trotsky1
Joined: 12 Apr 2005 Posts: 905
|
Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2008 7:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I really dont see what makes that deck casual looks like a merfolk list with green splashed for extra punch a bit like PV won lbc trial with. Interesting discussion on how good the splash is normally i don't like splashing but here i think its really good. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
moyo83
Joined: 29 Apr 2008 Posts: 11
|
Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2008 7:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Trotsky1 wrote: | | I really dont see what makes that deck casual looks like a merfolk list with green splashed for extra punch a bit like PV won lbc trial with. Interesting discussion on how good the splash is normally i don't like splashing but here i think its really good. |
That is correct . i think the goyf gives a better match against red decks but it seems that I´m a scrubb bcause I´m planning to play a "casual" deck in my nats LOL |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DaveK
Joined: 26 Nov 2007 Posts: 40
|
Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2008 8:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
| oh noes read teh forum ruels! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gypsy
Joined: 15 Jun 2007 Posts: 904
|
Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2008 8:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
| why is this in casual forum i dont get it |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
moyo83
Joined: 29 Apr 2008 Posts: 11
|
Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2008 8:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I guess bcause I didnt put any analysis on he list and no sb options .. Thats in the rules .. so I´ve put a new one with analysis |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|