Magic-League.com Forum Index Magic-League.com
Forums of Magic-League: Free Online Magic: the Gathering Play with Apprentice and Magic Workstation; casual or tournament play.
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

LSVīs Lark and whats next



 
Reply to topic    Magic-League.com Forum Index -> Standard (T2) Decks
Author Message
surfcheery



Joined: 21 Sep 2004
Posts: 46

PostPosted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 4:27 am    Post subject: LSVīs Lark and whats next Reply with quote

hello everyone im trying to figure out the best version of the lark deck
and have last chance to tune it a bit
...so my version is like this
4*Lark
4*Mulldrifter
4*Riftwatcher
3*Body Double
3*Flamekin Harbringer
1*Mirror Entity
1*Whispmare
1*Shriekmaw
2*venser

4*wrath of god
4* blink
4*rune snag
35 cards
and 25 lands
4*adarkar wastes
2*battlefield forge
2*shivan reef
2*ancient amphiteater
1* nimbus maze
3*terra expanse
5* plains
4*island
2*mountain
1*swamp

didnt think about side yet
but it should look like this
2*shriekmaw
2*whispmare
3*stonecloacker
4*dragons claw
4*negate

...if u noticed i dont play any articact (mind stone, lens...) but play 25 lands instead, what do u think about this version
flame on!!!
Back to top
Trotsky1



Joined: 12 Apr 2005
Posts: 905

PostPosted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 6:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I much perfer kenji's list it seems much more optimal.
Back to top
gypsy



Joined: 15 Jun 2007
Posts: 904

PostPosted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 8:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

i dont see why u dont play 4 harbinger its the best card in the deck
Back to top
Tenak



Joined: 16 Jul 2007
Posts: 39

PostPosted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 10:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Your mana base seems awful... not that I'm a fan of the 4c version anyway but without primal beyond prismatic lens etc you might be in trouble. Oh, and the deck NEEDS mana artifacts as obviously one of the main aims of the deck is to hit the 5 mana mark so it can cast lark ASAP.
Back to top
thranarama



Joined: 23 Apr 2005
Posts: 183

PostPosted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 10:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I definately think that you are missing a few important cards, and are playing too many of others. 4 Blink is too many, you want 2-3. Also, -1 Wrath, because you don't really want or need to draw multiples to win. and also - 1 land, so you have 4 slots open now to play 4 mind stone or prismatic lens. also, - ancient amphitheatre and forge for Primal Beyond, because all but 4 of your creatures are elementals. Finally, you only need 2 Body Doubles, and 3 riftwatchers, and only 1 venser is needed, too, cuz you would rather play Riftwing Cloudskate. whispermare seems terrible as well, since any problem enchantments can be bounced. that can be used for the 4th flamekin harbinger.
Back to top
Spliff



Joined: 31 Aug 2004
Posts: 46

PostPosted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 11:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

ACtually you need the wispmares to tutor for vs bitterblossom early on
Back to top
Spliff



Joined: 31 Aug 2004
Posts: 46

PostPosted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 11:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

also you need at least 3 body double too as they are teh knut
Back to top
thranarama



Joined: 23 Apr 2005
Posts: 183

PostPosted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 11:43 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

i guess, like, if you run careful consideration you only need two, cuz it's usually better for you to put it in the graveyard early anyway as a target for your reveilark. But without that i suppose you want more. the problem w/ whispermare is, by the time you get it and play it, they already have at least 1 guy, and only one is in the md, and it is a dead card vs. a lot of decks. Unless faeries/rogues becomes 85% of the meta, i don't see the point of playing a whispermare in the main. The sb is not very good, though, either. Negate seems awful against everyone. Dragons Claw is really narrow. Porphyry Nodes or Crovax should definately be in the board. Crovax is such a beast vs. the Bitterblossom decks.
Back to top
gypsy



Joined: 15 Jun 2007
Posts: 904

PostPosted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 12:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

i dont see why you changed the list lsv posted so much it is rly good it looks clunky but once u play it you realize everything is in there for a reason, careful consideration is rly bad you dont want a lot of 2 blue casting costs stuff, the lsv list is rly good please play decks you copy before you change anything in the deck
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Magic-League.com Forum Index -> Standard (T2) Decks All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Magic: the Gathering Cards

All content on this page may not be reproduced without consent of Magic-League Directors.
Magic the Gathering is TM and copyright Wizards of the Coast, Inc, a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc. All rights reserved.


About Us | Contact Us | Privacy Policy