Steal this tech: Dump Truck

Hank333 · Joined: 23 Oct 2006 Posts: 212 Location: San Antoni

So i've been messing with BW Aggro in t1.x for a while, it was starting to get stale, so i've tweaked it into this deck, i thought i had desinged this BWu aggro deck but apparently Ben Rubin desinged a similiar deck some years ago and called it Dump Truck...

Dark Confidant 4
meddling mage 4
Silver Knight 4
Ismaru, Hound of Konda 3
Savannah Lions 3
Trinket Mage 3
Duress 4
Vindicate 4
Chainers Edict 3
Terror 1(What targets can't it kill that are played in t1.x?)
Umezawas Jitte 2
Meekstone 1
Tormonds Crypt 1
Pithing Needle 1
Enginired Explosives 1
Flooded Stand 4
Polluted Delta 4
Windswept Heath 1
Godless Shrine 3
Hollowed Fountain 2
Watery Grave 1
Ancient Den 1
Vault of Whispers 1
Swamp 1
Island 1
plains 2

SB:
Cabal Therapy 4
Kataki, Wars Wage 3
Palden en-vec 2
Thivadar of Thorn 2
Trinket Mage 1
Pithing Needle 1
Tormonds Crypt 1
Jitte 1

The few questions i have about the deck that i'd like some input on are:
Sideboard help! pls! Its not where it needs to be i can tell.
Is the mana base spread to thin with all the 1 ofs?
Cabal Therapy Main Deck?

The BW Version of the deck i had Ran 3 paladen en-vevs, 3 soltari priest main deck, making Boros a cake walk, but without them, Boros and every other Aggro deck is much less consitent, but befor it lost top control because it was just a step too slow to kill befor tron was set up. Now with mages and such, should do much better.

Does it stand a chance!?!?

Paellin · Joined: 11 Jun 2006 Posts: 158

poopascoopa · Joined: 05 Jan 2005 Posts: 69

Ravenger?

It's "Ravager", you moron. Arcbound Ravager.

Hank333 · Joined: 23 Oct 2006 Posts: 212 Location: San Antoni

poopascoopa that is really petty and insignificant, why even waste your time?

poopascoopa · Joined: 05 Jan 2005 Posts: 69

Because, Hank, people who can't read and/or spell really annoy me.

I fail to see what is so difficult about reading the word "Ravager." So many idiots have been saying "Ravenger" since Mirrodin block and it makes no sense to me, so I bash them. Don't like it? Don't read my posts.

theTJtrooper · Joined: 29 Sep 2005 Posts: 119

COOLBOY · Joined: 03 Jul 2005 Posts: 399

Deejay_archy · Joined: 11 Dec 2006 Posts: 12

Coolboy, I think you didn't get Paellin's point. Those creatures are all creatures that you can't kill with terror and they are heavely played, and you even added another one (Mongrel). So don't use terror because it isn't relevant, use sudden death instead! It kills all those creatures (well, almost all, titan it can't!)!

Hank333 · Joined: 23 Oct 2006 Posts: 212 Location: San Antoni

i'm agianst Sudden Death in this deck because of double black cost, While it is good, and i have considered it, it won't make the cut most likely. My next choice after Terror and Edict is smoother, but i hate seeing mr. elephantand4life and not being able to kill him!

seb_ · Joined: 29 Jan 2006 Posts: 53

but smother is superior to terror in this format Wink