Magic-League.com Forum Index Magic-League.com
Forums of Magic-League: Free Online Magic: the Gathering Play with Apprentice and Magic Workstation; casual or tournament play.
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

UW aggro control



 
Reply to topic    Magic-League.com Forum Index -> Standard (T2) Decks
Author Message
buda



Joined: 18 Jun 2005
Posts: 47

PostPosted: Mon May 08, 2006 5:38 pm    Post subject: UW aggro control Reply with quote

The Deck

7 Plains
4 Adarkar Wastes
4 Hallowed Fountain
4 Island
1 Oboro, Palace in the Clouds
1 Minamo, School at Water's E
1 Eiganjo Castle
1 Azorius Chancery
2 Shining Shoal
3 Condemn
3 Mana Leak
3 Faith's Fetters
4 Remand
4 Ninja of the Deep Hours
4 Savannah Lions
3 Isamaru, Hound of Konda
3 Azorius First-Wing
3 Azorius Guildmage
3 Kira, Great Glass-Spinner
3 Paladin en-Vec

Sideboard
1 Shining Shoal
2 Eight-and-a-Half-Tails
3 Umezawa's Jitte
3 Hokori, Dust Drinker
3 Sacred Ground
3 Bathe in Light

What you people think about it?
Back to top
Dr_Moo



Joined: 26 Nov 2004
Posts: 954

PostPosted: Mon May 08, 2006 6:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Your creatures are just worse than other aggro decks, and I don't think your tricks are good enough to bridge the gap. I am quite interested by u/w Tallowisp, and my suggestion would be to change to that. I can't think of an advantage to u/w; you have worse creatures, conditional (Condemn) or slow (Fetters) removal, and no burn. The sole advantage is countermagic and Ninja, which is inferior to Dark Confidant.

This may be better against control decks. That would need testing to determine. While you have counters, you're slower and have no Chars to win after the board is stable.
Back to top
synch987



Joined: 31 Mar 2006
Posts: 256

PostPosted: Tue May 09, 2006 12:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

what creatures exactly do you have a problem with? paladin? isamaru? ninja? i think all these creatures have proven themselves.

my only worry is that you wont get ninja out turn 2 that often, so i would drop a ninja and a fetters for 2 azorius herald. also this deck will run out of steam against anyone who can stop the ninja.

replace condemn with reciprocate, as in an aggro deck with no giant finishers (meloku), the life you may be forced to give them could lose games, and you have 16+ life gain in the deck.

i think the board is spot on, and overall its a very nice deck. unfortunately WW aggro is probably overall better than this Sad

congrats on posting a deck that didnt suck as much ass as the other ones round here Very Happy
Back to top
buda



Joined: 18 Jun 2005
Posts: 47

PostPosted: Tue May 09, 2006 11:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

thnx i'm working in the deck constantly to improve until its perfect for me!
Back to top
Dr_Moo



Joined: 26 Nov 2004
Posts: 954

PostPosted: Tue May 09, 2006 11:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It isn't that there are problems with your creatures, it's just that they aren't as good as the creatures in other decks (Kird Ape, Watchwolf, Scab-Clan Mauler, Dark Confidant, Nantuko Husk, Ghost Council, etc). You have to make up for this disparity somewhere, and I don't think countermagic is enough.
Back to top
Visara



Joined: 17 Jan 2005
Posts: 53

PostPosted: Tue May 09, 2006 12:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dr_Moo is exactly right. I agree 100%.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Magic-League.com Forum Index -> Standard (T2) Decks All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Magic: the Gathering Cards

All content on this page may not be reproduced without consent of Magic-League Directors.
Magic the Gathering is TM and copyright Wizards of the Coast, Inc, a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc. All rights reserved.


About Us | Contact Us | Privacy Policy