|
|
| Author |
Message |
Kamisamaa
Joined: 16 May 2008 Posts: 4
|
Posted: Wed May 28, 2008 2:50 pm Post subject: Usefulness of Pact of Negation? |
|
|
| I'm considering running it in my Blue/Red Control/Burn, but I'm wondering if it's really worth it. It looks like it could totally lock someone down if used at a critical juncture, but it really limits one's options during the next turn by sucking up so much mana. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
commador01
Joined: 24 Feb 2008 Posts: 35
|
Posted: Wed May 28, 2008 3:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Would it really be worth wasting a turn to counter something that you could with a rune snag? Why not stronger Burn spells? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ggerg
Joined: 04 Sep 2005 Posts: 468
|
Posted: Wed May 28, 2008 3:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| really depends on the deck. for u, if ur not playing guile, probably not. try it as a one-of tho. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BusDriver
Joined: 28 Jan 2006 Posts: 132
|
Posted: Wed May 28, 2008 3:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
a one of it is good
the cards quality might not be optimal for the current t2 decks but it can completely surprise an opponent which is worth a lot too.
Imagine a situation where you are completely tapped out and the opponent plays a key spell (sulfurous blast at instant speed, cryptic command tapping you down or/and countering a key spell, or a combodeck, a counterwar to get that key spell in). If you can win the turn you play it, it's completely awesome.
The problem is that the current decks are not optimal for this card. Faeries and merfolk could use it as a oneshot. Faeries has enough land to support it, but it really doesn't wanna tap out on it's upkeep. Merfolk only run 22 lands so the relevance is less. But again if it counters that key removal spell or a cryptic command it works.
Also note that rune snag isn't a reliable counter late game unless it has been played a few times. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kamisamaa
Joined: 16 May 2008 Posts: 4
|
Posted: Wed May 28, 2008 4:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| commador01 wrote: | | Would it really be worth wasting a turn to counter something that you could with a rune snag? Why not stronger Burn spells? |
But Rune Snag costs mana. Pact of Negation doesn't until the next turn. It's meant to bait your opponent out by tapping out beforehand and them playing that big spell.
| Ggerg wrote: | | really depends on the deck. for u, if ur not playing guile, probably not. try it as a one-of tho. |
It might be more important to consider the deck I'm playing against than the deck I'm playing. With a combo that depends on a single card, I could really destroy someone's strategy.....
And BusDriver has a good point. I'll keep it in my sideboard, at least.
Thanks, guys. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zoom
Joined: 18 Jan 2005 Posts: 87
|
Posted: Wed May 28, 2008 4:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Pact of negation isn't the greatest counter in the world. One of the best uses is if you want to run tolaria west, then including it as a 1-of is cool, alongside urza's factory, academy ruins, kobold keep, sb tormod's, or even pact of the titan. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ggerg
Joined: 04 Sep 2005 Posts: 468
|
Posted: Wed May 28, 2008 4:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| um...u should either play it main or not at all. what's the benefit of it sb? what does it come in against? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JeZeus
Joined: 05 Sep 2004 Posts: 122
|
Posted: Wed May 28, 2008 6:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Do you run tolaria west???? Personally for me if im going to run pact of negations its A) in a MUC deck and B) The deck is running Tolaria West. Your not playing MUC, and you are not running Tolaria West to my knowledge. So I can't see any reason to it if your going to use it as a 1 slot. If your going to use more then one it would probably make your deck a little unstable, and it would be annoying to draw them in your first hand or draw into them on turns 2-4. Besides all of that, It is an amazing counterspell in the right situation, and proper deck. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aldaryn
Joined: 02 Sep 2004 Posts: 467
|
Posted: Thu May 29, 2008 8:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
| It's really only good to protect a combo when you are about to go off, or to backup a must-resolve spell when you tap out for it, like Crovax vs. Faeries for example. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Vedrfolner
Joined: 04 Apr 2006 Posts: 1399
|
Posted: Thu May 29, 2008 9:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
| yes could help reveiblink vs faeries this, couldn't it? 3 crovax, 3 pact of negation side, 4 rune snag main |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|