|
|
| Author |
Message |
jonne3
Joined: 30 Oct 2004 Posts: 7
|
Posted: Wed May 14, 2008 11:53 am Post subject: GBW Aggroloam/Terranova |
|
|
This is a deck i haven't seen around on magic-league or MWS at all, whereas it is considered a tier1 deck in Holland.
I'd like to hear your comments about it.
Here's is the list im playing at the moment, though i have tested a lot of different lists so i will also add possible other options.
Lands:
4 Wasteland
1 Volrath's Stronghold
1 Barren Moor
3 Bayou
1 Scrubland
4 Tranquil Thicket
3 Savannah
4 Windswept Heath
1 Bloodstained Mire
1 Polluted Delta
1 Forest
1 Swamp
Creatures
3 Terravore
4 Dark Confidant
4 Tarmogoyf
3 Eternal Witness
Spells
4 Life from the Loam
2 Engineered Explosives
4 Mox Diamond
4 Swords to Plowshares
2 Pernicious Deed
2 Extirpate
3 Vindicate
Sideboard
2 Umezawa's Jitte
3 Krosan Grip
3 Duress
3 Tormod's Crypt
4 Gaddock Teeg
Some other versions i've tested: version one had 4 thoughtseize and 4 wild mongrel instead of 3 vindicate, 3 witness and 2 extirpate. Version 2 had 2 umezawa's jitte instead of 1 witness and 1 vindicate. I have not yet decided which is the strongest, but im currently testing the list above.
The sideboard is off course highly meta dependant so this is just an example. This sideboard is built for a metagame in which different kinds of combo decks are expected, which is the worst match-up for the deck, so it has teegs and duress for that reason.
I'd appreciate idea's to strenghten the deck. Please dont start about playing red instead of white, i know thats a really viable option but i simply like this version better and i happen to own this mana base and dont have taiga's and foothills and so on. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cranemaker21
Joined: 08 Jun 2006 Posts: 70
|
Posted: Wed May 14, 2008 12:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| you might think im wrong but i would play doran istead of terravore because turn two or three, terravore is only around a 3/3 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jonne3
Joined: 30 Oct 2004 Posts: 7
|
Posted: Wed May 14, 2008 12:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| With all the testing ive done terravore is one of the last cards i'd cut. It can easily be a 9/9 trample in turn 5 (if your opponent fetches a few times). Doran is a good creature but in this deck terravore simply does more, with trample as a great bonus. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gypsy
Joined: 15 Jun 2007 Posts: 868
|
Posted: Wed May 14, 2008 12:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| why would u play doran are u retarded, thats rly dumb. your list looks interesting i ahvent seen it without red ill give ur list a try |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
trueeevil
Joined: 08 Dec 2007 Posts: 190
|
Posted: Wed May 14, 2008 2:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| The 2 engineered explosives seems weird. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jonne3
Joined: 30 Oct 2004 Posts: 7
|
Posted: Wed May 14, 2008 3:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
weird in what way? They have come in handy a lot of times for me!
If you have a comment please give arguments. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gypsy
Joined: 15 Jun 2007 Posts: 868
|
Posted: Wed May 14, 2008 5:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| explosives is very underrated its so good in legacy |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SteveMan
Joined: 13 Apr 2007 Posts: 11
|
Posted: Wed May 14, 2008 7:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Cut Dark COnfidant for a genesis. I've played this deck it's AMAZING and gesis allows ewitness- vindicate goodness |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jonne3
Joined: 30 Oct 2004 Posts: 7
|
Posted: Wed May 14, 2008 11:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
thats an interesting option. Though i dont think it would be viable in this version, without wild mongrel, since the only way to get it in the graveyard would be to dredge.
If i change back to a version with mongrels ill seriously consider genesis.
Although cutting a confidant isnt something i would do easily, they're game winners! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jonne3
Joined: 30 Oct 2004 Posts: 7
|
Posted: Sun May 18, 2008 4:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| any more ideas?? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gumonshoe
Joined: 15 Sep 2005 Posts: 433
|
Posted: Sun May 18, 2008 10:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| the only thing i would do is change the jittes in the side for swords its completly opiion because the extra mana hurts but i think the card advantage is worth it |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jonne3
Joined: 30 Oct 2004 Posts: 7
|
Posted: Thu May 22, 2008 12:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I suppose u mean sword of fire and ice? I dont really see the point in that. Against what match-ups would u side them in? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gumonshoe
Joined: 15 Sep 2005 Posts: 433
|
Posted: Tue May 27, 2008 2:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sorry for my last comment it was made without testing
i have just started playing the green white versions with geddons andmongrels and i think the deck is absolutly awsome |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jonne3
Joined: 30 Oct 2004 Posts: 7
|
Posted: Wed May 28, 2008 3:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The version with armageddon and mongrel is an earlier version of this deck. It was called terrageddon back then. Later the deck was improved to something more similar to my list and called terranova.
Mongel is still good in the new version but geddon doesnt fit into my list. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|