|
|
| Author |
Message |
Avata
Joined: 03 Dec 2006 Posts: 372
|
Posted: Mon May 05, 2008 10:17 pm Post subject: Where's the Best Place to Play Poker Online? |
|
|
I live in the U.S. so that might have an impact on the responses, but I'm curious.
About a month ago I started playing at Full Tilt Poker, because I couldn't find any local brick and mortar games. Well, since I've started I've managed to triple my bankroll, so now I'm looking at the game as potentially more of a full time thing. I'm just trying to figure out if FT is the best place to play. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gypsy
Joined: 15 Jun 2007 Posts: 868
|
Posted: Mon May 05, 2008 10:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| poker stars, party poker, doesnt rly matter where you play. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Avata
Joined: 03 Dec 2006 Posts: 372
|
Posted: Mon May 05, 2008 11:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| How do the entry fees compare? At full tilt usually the entry fee is 10% of the buy in. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
illus
Joined: 13 May 2005 Posts: 32
|
Posted: Mon May 05, 2008 11:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| PokerStars |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ACM
Joined: 03 Jan 2008 Posts: 88
|
Posted: Mon May 05, 2008 11:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| PokerStars. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
themagicman
Joined: 05 Feb 2005 Posts: 17
|
Posted: Tue May 06, 2008 6:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Full Tilt- I dont play for huge money but at cash tables people enjoy giving thier $ away. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aceben3
Joined: 28 Oct 2006 Posts: 45
|
Posted: Tue May 06, 2008 8:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Both Full Tilt and PokerStars are great for MTTs and Cash Games, but Stars is much better for Sit-n-Goes. The entry fee varies, but I've never noticed a sizeable difference between the two. I would just try to determine which one has lighter competition or like better and play there.
If you are just starting out, smaller sites with good bonuses or rakeback deals can help you build your bankroll a lot. There's a risk with a non-reputable site that you may be ripped off though, so take that into account.
I have accounts on both FT and Stars, but I usually prefer FT. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
N3CR0S
Joined: 09 Jan 2008 Posts: 1
|
Posted: Tue May 06, 2008 10:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
FTP is great site for playing, but it have very big rake, on micro stakes you get burned by this big rake for you, so you must register by affiliates, with rakeback, i think normally is 36% rakeback.
i think best sites are PokerStars, FullTiltPoker.
on PartyPoker is playing very much people,but that software is really bad, it have lags and small timebank, so it isn't good for multitabling, i was playing there 9 tables and it's really hard, with that lags and small timebank, so i think PokerStars is best |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dameykins
Joined: 29 Apr 2008 Posts: 35
|
Posted: Tue May 06, 2008 10:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
pokerstars is the best for me
you have $5 head-to-head games and those are easy to win |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Avata
Joined: 03 Dec 2006 Posts: 372
|
Posted: Tue May 06, 2008 12:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I've been pretty impressed with FTP (and got sucked into that mainly by their $600 rakeback bonus), but by the sounds of it I'll have to give PokerStars a try just to see which I prefer. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Acid_Christ
Joined: 28 Aug 2004 Posts: 502
|
Posted: Wed May 07, 2008 5:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Speaking of Poker Stars, I log on and see this message-
Julien Nuijten wins PokerStars LAPT Rio
check it out at
http://www.pokerstarsblog.com/lapt-rio-season-1/
He even shaved the pubes off his head |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|