|
|
| Author |
Message |
Delicious
Joined: 08 Jun 2007 Posts: 388
|
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2008 10:38 am Post subject: Prismatic Omen + Magus of the Moon |
|
|
| If you were just playing non-basics and dropped both of these, would you now have all of your lands acting as non-dmg City of Brass? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ACM
Joined: 03 Jan 2008 Posts: 13
|
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2008 11:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
As long as you have Prismatic Omen in play your lands are all basic land types, meaning they can tap for all mana.
What do you mean Magus of the Moon is for? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Delicious
Joined: 08 Jun 2007 Posts: 388
|
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2008 11:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
| read it wrong. thought it said basic lands you control. even better now. another $25 card |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jacois
Joined: 05 Sep 2004 Posts: 392
|
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2008 11:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
| $25? lol |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MaksymG
Joined: 24 Apr 2006 Posts: 142
|
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2008 12:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| historically, 25 dollar cards in the past have been those that you want to draw more than one of (with the exception of jitte but even there you want to draw more than one due to opponents jitte as well as stuff like putrefy in the format). Prismatic omen... It is a good card if you hit it turn 2 in the right deck. But drawing more than 1 creates card advatnage for your opponent. When designing a deck you want to avoid one that generates -1 for yourself out of thin air if at all possible so this will be nowhere near $25 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TugaChampion
Joined: 26 Jan 2006 Posts: 305
|
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2008 12:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
LOL! 25$???
Not even 5$! Most decks already do fine with all the non basic lands right now and there's the 2/1 guy for 1G that does basically the same. The guy has been in T2 for a while and saw no play yet. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MaksymG
Joined: 24 Apr 2006 Posts: 142
|
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2008 2:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Well to be fair, joiner adepts die to everything... And you can't really risk your entire mana base on a creature that just dies when your opponent sees you paying BBR then WWUU the next turn. This is significantly better but will still see very limited play. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kfcman
Joined: 16 Sep 2006 Posts: 577
|
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2008 2:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| TugaChampion wrote: | LOL! 25$???
Not even 5$! Most decks already do fine with all the non basic lands right now and there's the 2/1 guy for 1G that does basically the same. The guy has been in T2 for a while and saw no play yet. |
joinder adept. and the dude has seen no play becuz its a creature and there are a thousand easier ways to kill a dude than an enchantment.
but yea, nowhere near 25. probly wont see play in t2 at all. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
center425
Joined: 06 May 2006 Posts: 304
|
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2008 3:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| This card does nothing :/ I would rather have an into the north engine than this, unless you really want to get up to 5 for your Tribal Flames. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TugaChampion
Joined: 26 Jan 2006 Posts: 305
|
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2008 4:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| yes being a creature means it dies to everything but at least it attacks and does much more than the enchantment. The adept should only be used as a potential fixer in a 2/3 colors deck, not as na essencial fixer. Anyway if your deck really needs the enchantment to do it's thing it's probably bad anyway. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kfcman
Joined: 16 Sep 2006 Posts: 577
|
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2008 8:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| @ Tuga: Any deck that would play this would be some sort of weird control or combo deck. Not a deck that would need a 2/1 bear... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|