Magic-League.com Forum Index Magic-League.com
Forums of Magic-League: Free Online Magic: the Gathering Play with Apprentice and Magic Workstation; casual or tournament play.
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

What's wrong with Ron Paul??


Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Reply to topic    Magic-League.com Forum Index -> Other - Non-Magic
Author Message
Manipulation



Joined: 10 Mar 2006
Posts: 294
Location: Oxnard

PostPosted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 5:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

As for your ludicrous statement about how if we withdrew, our terrorist attack rate would double. I'd like to point out that the terrorist groups we are "defending" Iraq from had nothing to do with 9/11. And that thanks to the excessive dept we've put ourselves into from united defense, a another 9/11 isn't conceivable and won't be for decades. The bush administration has made this country so paranoid of terrorist attacks that are biggest threat isn't from the poor ass terrorists across the seas but from our own citizens. Ever see the tv show Jericho? Thats more likely to happen then another 9/11. And I'm not saying that will ever be conceivable either.[/quote]

9/11 count: 3

A little low, but you may want to send Giuliani a sample of your writing! Razz
Back to top
Craze



Joined: 30 Jan 2005
Posts: 5347
Location: Indiana, U

PostPosted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 5:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Manipulation wrote:
As for your ludicrous statement about how if we withdrew, our terrorist attack rate would double. I'd like to point out that the terrorist groups we are "defending" Iraq from had nothing to do with 9/11. And that thanks to the excessive dept we've put ourselves into from united defense, a another 9/11 isn't conceivable and won't be for decades. The bush administration has made this country so paranoid of terrorist attacks that are biggest threat isn't from the poor ass terrorists across the seas but from our own citizens. Ever see the tv show Jericho? Thats more likely to happen then another 9/11. And I'm not saying that will ever be conceivable either.


9/11 count: 3

A little low, but you may want to send Giuliani a sample of your writing! Razz[/quote]

you have to use 9/11. Its the biggest terrorist attack on us soil ever and its generally all anybody understands
Back to top
Stucco



Joined: 14 Mar 2005
Posts: 542

PostPosted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 7:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ransom3 wrote:
Here are examples of a newsletter that Ron Paul's name has been associated with for many years. See if you want your next president to be like this guy.

http://www.tnr.com/politics/story.html?id=74978161-f730-43a2-91c3-de262573a129


Seriously, read this. This is just ONE of many such articles on Ron Paul that I have read as well. The guy is a full blown biggot in nearly every way. He just sucks you in with what you want to hear. Ron Paul is one fucked up individual.
Back to top
BigShow



Joined: 07 Apr 2005
Posts: 1306
Location: Igloo town

PostPosted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 8:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Won't Lie. I know nothing about American Politics. But I still think that no one should base a book by its cover.

Sure, you can say he is great, and of course have a short attention span and try to read lord of the rings. I think what it comes down to is, within the 30+ yrs he has been in, he hasn't really brought what he has said to the people.

Other than that God Speed.
Cheers
Bigshow
Back to top
Boba383



Joined: 26 Sep 2005
Posts: 67

PostPosted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 11:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ok me personally, I feel very strongly on politics, and lots of social issues even though I'm just 18 (lol i gotta make up for all my idiot peers who decide that voting is not worth their time)

first let me say the political system is messed up in the USA beyond belief. The politicians are too concerned about keeping their sponsors happy to do anything useful, and none of them seem to represent what most of the people here want (not completely true, but i find that a lot of people see suporting someone as really just choosing the lesser of two evils really)

Ron Paul could be a good president in my eyes, because I do believe our government has gotten too large for its own good. Welfare programs are exploited and abused and need to be seriously revised. I can't say I want all government programs gone but a lot of them are wastes of money and abused by the lazy people in my country (and its across the board, there are lazy ass white trash, illegals immigrants collecting on fake SSN, lazy blacks, its almost everyone...lol except the asians...for some reason I cant see asians standing in welfare lines haha. and im not a racist! im white and despise the lazy white trash as much as everyone else who exploits the welfare system)

Second, the USA has definetely made a mistake by goin into Iraq, but pulling out is really not the answer. I dont know what the answewr is (again I'm only 1Cool but i really doubt pulling out would help. In all reality we should have taken out Saudi Arabia not Iraq. They are the worlds biggest funders of terrorists worldwide and build thousands of extremist schools around the world to train new terrorists (and I apologize to anybody here who may be Saudi Arabian, I mean no insult to you. Just the people funding terrorists). I am truly not affraid of a terrorist attack myself, but it is more than likely to happen again, and I'm tired of people telling me and my country we are idiots (haha ok yes some of us are, including the president) but we aren't going to just sit back and let people do what they want to us. And how the hell does putting ourselves in debt make another 9/11 impossible?? that makes no sense at all......

As a final note, ethanol is the most idiotic thing people are supporting....besides the "environmental factor" and the "foriegn dependence" factor (foriegn dependence could be cut down if we drilled here, but personally living in California I can tell you that it is actually illegal to build new drills offshore where a large portion of oil is stored, and enviornmentalists throw a fit it people want to drill), one of the biggest complaints about oil is the price. Guess what....ethanol is more expensive. It is cheaper per gallon but fuel economy reduces dramatically (its about a 40-45% drop in fuel economy i believe) because of the lower potential energy in ethanol. and thank you again i know this from personal experience as cars in CA have lower fuel economies bcuz our state government decided ethanol to be mixed in with gasoline everywhere in the state. But the cost of ethanol is actually higher than that of gasonline, so guess what? It probably isnt gona be the "answer" that people are looking for. But I do agree that gasonline needs to b replaced (im personally for hydrogen. i have a whole theory on how hyrdogen could b produced in high enough amounts to make it viable but my hands are too tired to type it out right now. maybe some other time)

Anywayz if you managed to get through this than congratulations you made it through the rants of a 18 year old libertarian who believes he is at least some what well informed....haha

Boba383
Back to top
lizardgod



Joined: 21 Feb 2007
Posts: 31

PostPosted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 12:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

i am not big into politics but since i do vote i pay a little more than minimal attention to it. One thing i would like to say for this guy is that i read he was talking about doing away with some of the foreign aid programs. It listed a few countrys that he would remove or reduce aid to. several of the countries that were listed were countries that vote against us in major UN votes. I don't see why we should give Pakistan 1.3 billion dollars when they vote against us 83% of time in UN votes. I don't think we should pay countries to vote with us, but i would expect that if we (the taxpayers) are gonna give money to the goverment and then it is gonna give it to countries those countries should at least attempt to help us in affairs we are trying to pass UN voting procedure. Granted on most of the votes we still win but that is not the point, this guy wants to send the message that "Hey oppose us and we will not help you, side with us and we will share the wealth. Sound like a deal?" and i agree with that, not saying he doesnt have faults or that i will vote for him but it is something in his favor come november.
Back to top
Boba383



Joined: 26 Sep 2005
Posts: 67

PostPosted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 3:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
i am not big into politics but since i do vote i pay a little more than minimal attention to it. One thing i would like to say for this guy is that i read he was talking about doing away with some of the foreign aid programs. It listed a few countrys that he would remove or reduce aid to. several of the countries that were listed were countries that vote against us in major UN votes. I don't see why we should give Pakistan 1.3 billion dollars when they vote against us 83% of time in UN votes. I don't think we should pay countries to vote with us, but i would expect that if we (the taxpayers) are gonna give money to the goverment and then it is gonna give it to countries those countries should at least attempt to help us in affairs we are trying to pass UN voting procedure. Granted on most of the votes we still win but that is not the point, this guy wants to send the message that "Hey oppose us and we will not help you, side with us and we will share the wealth. Sound like a deal?" and i agree with that, not saying he doesnt have faults or that i will vote for him but it is something in his favor come november.


id agree with u on that but then people will also point out that its not necessarily the people who would recieve this aid that support the governments decision (then again i doubt the aid money actually reaches the people either) but still the money is necessarily for the government to use but for the people there who are in poor living conditions....but like i said i do agree with this depending on what is done with the money on a country by country basis.
Back to top
Boba383



Joined: 26 Sep 2005
Posts: 67

PostPosted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 3:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Stucco wrote:
ransom3 wrote:
Here are examples of a newsletter that Ron Paul's name has been associated with for many years. See if you want your next president to be like this guy.

http://www.tnr.com/politics/story.html?id=74978161-f730-43a2-91c3-de262573a129


Seriously, read this. This is just ONE of many such articles on Ron Paul that I have read as well. The guy is a full blown biggot in nearly every way. He just sucks you in with what you want to hear. Ron Paul is one fucked up individual.


and concerning this, im not sure what the truth behind these are but aparantly ron paul claims those were not newsletters he endorsed or wrote (again im just going off his official statements concerning it...well actually the current statements are a long the lines of "This is old news, its been covered already, and I'm not going to discuss it." his old statements claim these were not his writings. i dont know what true or not and right now im a little to tired to find out and it doesnt rele concern me bcuz im a registered democrat (and im going to say it....I HATE HILLARY CLINTON! i will seriously move to canada if that bitch of a woman gets voted president....god....it gives me nightmares thinking about it)
Back to top
YTheAlien



Joined: 22 Mar 2007
Posts: 45

PostPosted: Thu Jan 17, 2008 3:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Boba383 wrote:
(and im going to say it....I HATE HILLARY CLINTON! i will seriously move to canada if that bitch of a woman gets voted president....god....it gives me nightmares thinking about it)


Clinton is a pretty standard-issue center-left Democrat, maybe a little hawkish, but nothing to warrant such hate.

Ron Paul is a racist, bigoted, crazy old man.
Back to top
BigShow



Joined: 07 Apr 2005
Posts: 1306
Location: Igloo town

PostPosted: Thu Jan 17, 2008 8:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hillary has years while she manipulated Bill.
Back to top
Boba383



Joined: 26 Sep 2005
Posts: 67

PostPosted: Sat Jan 19, 2008 10:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

No I have a very good reason for not liking her...for instanace she wants to increase spending in the US by about another 1.5 trillion dollars (between universal healrth care, which I do not want to get into, Pre-k programs which there are already programs that cover that in place and other programs she wants to start the estimated cost is almost $1 trillion for universal health care alone)...being that we are already in massive debt I have no idea how this is supossed to work...and she wants to increase taxes on business and corporations, like most democrats do, which is a really shitty thing to do because frankly its bad that my parents who makes about $250k a year have to pay the same percentage of their income in taxes as people who make hundreds of millions of dollars a year simply because they registered their company as a corporation (and people seem to think corporations get all these tax breaks...haha ya thats not true in our case. I cant speak for large corporations but that couldnt b farther from the truth in my experience...last time I checked paying about 50% of ones income in taxes is not getting tax breaks)....also I frankly find it wonderful how i own my own business and I have to pay 15% extra on taxes on top of income taxes because I own my own business...my friend made more money than me for instance one year and I still payed more than he did in taxes...and frankly I do not make much money I am a part time worker and I dont want to see more of my money go to people who sit on their asses and do nothing with their lives (one of the reasons I like Ron Paul...no more welfare)

Yes I am young and a libertarian, and am not in support of a lot of stuff "to help those in need" because the systems are abused and exploited by thousands. Also I am not a Republican...Republicans care too much about forcing people to live under Christianity and telling us what we can do for my personal taste...too bad Ron Pual has no chance of winning anywhere though *sigh* but nyway on the original topic, really I registered Democrat because I will do anything I can to prevent Hilary from becoming President...and by all accounts she is not a "center-left" politician, her programs are very much socialist programs, which is not exactly a "moderate left" point of view.
Back to top
Boba383



Joined: 26 Sep 2005
Posts: 67

PostPosted: Sat Jan 19, 2008 10:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

YTheAlien wrote:
Boba383 wrote:
(and im going to say it....I HATE HILLARY CLINTON! i will seriously move to canada if that bitch of a woman gets voted president....god....it gives me nightmares thinking about it)


Clinton is a pretty standard-issue center-left Democrat, maybe a little hawkish, but nothing to warrant such hate.

Ron Paul is a racist, bigoted, crazy old man.




haha and those newsletters...if you read about what has been said about these it really is old news. Ron Paul tried dealing with this years before the election, and he has done much in the way of proving that he does not support the ideas stated in the articles (for instance he wishes to end the war on drugs which people know puts thousands of blacks into prison on stupid charges based on peoples choices to use drugs). Now for all I know I guess he still could be a racist and a biggot, in which case I do not support him, but unless they can come up with better information that he is than decade old articles that it is undetermined if he wrote them or not and that were brought up and dealt with years ago but mysteriously show up again when he decides to run for president ill say he sounds like a person id support if he had any chance of winning (which like Ive said he doesnt so i guess this doesnt really matter...)
Back to top
Apos



Joined: 24 May 2005
Posts: 732

PostPosted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 5:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

americans have only 2 canditates ron paul and the rest
Back to top
Boba383



Joined: 26 Sep 2005
Posts: 67

PostPosted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 10:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Apos wrote:
americans have only 2 canditates ron paul and the rest


????....uh ok...well not rele true. We are in the primary stage where people get to vote for who we want to be the next canidate for president for our given party.

ron paul is a republican but really has no chance...my prediction would be John McCain for the republicans and I hope that Obama will beat Clinton.[/code]
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Magic-League.com Forum Index -> Other - Non-Magic All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Magic: the Gathering Cards

All content on this page may not be reproduced without consent of Magic-League Directors.
Magic the Gathering is TM and copyright Wizards of the Coast, Inc, a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc. All rights reserved.


About Us | Contact Us | Privacy Policy