|
|
| Author |
Message |
CUB3X
Joined: 10 Feb 2007
Posts: 19
|
 Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 4:08 pm Post subject: UGw Threshold |
 |
|
I have recently created a UGw Threshold Deck that I am looking to run in tournaments at the local brick and mortar store (Not Online). I would all suggestions you can give as I am not an expert.
**MainDeck
// Lands
2 [IA] Island (2)
3 [ON] Windswept Heath
4 [B] Tropical Island
3 [R] Tundra
1 [CST] Plains (3)
1 [IN] Forest (1)
3 [ON] Flooded Strand
2 [10E] Treetop Village
// Creatures
4 [OD] Nimble Mongoose
4 [FUT] Tarmogoyf
4 [OD] Werebear
// Spells
3 [AL] Force of Will
4 [NE] Daze
4 [U] Swords to Plowshares
4 [5E] Brainstorm
4 [DIS] Spell Snare
4 [CHK] Sensei's Divining Top
3 [FD] Serum Visions
//Planeswalkers
3 [LRW] Garruk Wildspeaker
// Sideboard
SB: 3 [PS] Meddling Mage
SB: 4 [OV] Hydroblast
SB: 4 [SC] Stifle
SB: 4 [CS] Counterbalance
Last edited by CUB3X on Thu Jan 03, 2008 5:19 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Spyx
Joined: 31 Oct 2004
Posts: 821
|
| Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 4:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ponder > Serum Visions
Also Garruk on 19 lands? Has that been working out?
4 Top without CB is too many. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ginksigerg
Joined: 28 Apr 2007
Posts: 19
|
| Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 4:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| garruk is a creature wow... and bring the counterbalances into the main deck... thelock is just tooo good..and garruck can be good for the overrrun but is he realy needed? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Cranemaker21
Joined: 08 Jun 2006
Posts: 70
|
| Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 4:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Treetop village makes me puke. Please dont play it. pithing needle isreally good in the meta btw |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CUB3X
Joined: 10 Feb 2007
Posts: 19
|
| Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 5:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | Ponder > Serum Visions
Also Garruk on 19 lands? Has that been working out?
4 Top without CB is too many. |
I do have to agree with you that Ponder may be better then Serum Visions.
| Quote: | | garruk is a creature wow... and bring the counterbalances into the main deck... thelock is just tooo good..and garruck can be good for the overrrun but is he realy needed? |
If I take the Garruks out then I would be able to fit in the CBs. Taking the Garruks out may be risky. I'll do some more testing with out the Garruks.
| Quote: | | Treetop village makes me puke. Please dont play it. pithing needle isreally good in the meta btw |
I think you are underestimating Treetop Villages,
1. I use them against control since they can't do much besides drop a needle.
2. Its a 3/3 trampler for two mana then can end the game.
I also would like to know whether a Mystic Enforcer would fit in here? I just don't know what I would take out to put them in. I also debated wether Lignifys would fit. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
aceben3
Joined: 28 Oct 2006
Posts: 45
|
| Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 7:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have nothing constructive to add about the deck, but you talk like David Sklansky.
Do you see why? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Daveslusher
Joined: 05 Nov 2006
Posts: 202
|
| Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 7:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Treetop is TERRIBLE. You need all your drops and village hinders that to a crippling point. And yes Enforcer should be in here over werebear |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CUB3X
Joined: 10 Feb 2007
Posts: 19
|
| Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 8:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I did some testing online and came up with adjustments and here is the new list:
// Lands
3 [ON] Polluted Delta
3 [ON] Windswept Heath
3 [IA] Island
1 [IN] Forest
3 [R] Tundra
4 [B] Tropical Island
1 [CST] Plains
// Creatures
4 [OD] Nimble Mongoose
4 [OD] Werebear
3 [FUT] Tarmogoyf
1 [OD] Mystic Enforcer
// Spells
4 [5E] Brainstorm
4 [AL] Force of Will
3 [NE] Daze
4 [LRW] Ponder
1 [7E] Counterspell
3 [U] Swords to Plowshares
3 [CS] Counterbalance
3 [CHK] Sensei's Divining Top
3 [JU] Mental Note
2 [DIS] Spell Snare
// Sideboard
SB: 2 [OD] Mystic Enforcer
SB: 3 [10E] Pithing Needle
SB: 3 [US] Worship
SB: 3 [PS] Meddling Mage
SB: 4 [OV] Hydroblast
What do you think of that. It's obviously better. I could probably still use some work though. Give me as much criticism and suggestions as you can please. It's much appreciated. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
rdeg87
Joined: 29 Apr 2007
Posts: 122
|
| Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 9:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I love the way you took out 1 Tarmogoyf, the cornerstone of the deck, and added 1 random Mystic Enforcer. leave the Tarmogoyf alone, they are happiest in fours. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
lennin
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 9:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| why are u playing polluted deltas |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CUB3X
Joined: 10 Feb 2007
Posts: 19
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2008 6:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | I love the way you took out 1 Tarmogoyf, the cornerstone of the deck, and added 1 random Mystic Enforcer. leave the Tarmogoyf alone, they are happiest in fours. |
I was waiting for this comment haha. They do go good in quads. I will make the adjustment.
| Quote: | | why are u playing polluted deltas |
the only reason I am using deltas is because i own deltas but not any strands. eventually i will trade them over for strands. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
