|
|
| Author |
Message |
KeySam
Joined: 14 Oct 2005 Posts: 539
|
Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 11:27 am Post subject: Soft Lock |
|
|
Soft Lock
Artifact
2
Rare
No Player can win or lose the game.
At the beginning of your upkeep, sacrifice a permanent with the lowest converted mana cost among permanents you control.
What now?
Was just an idea, but what do you think? Is the card too good, i like the idea, of stalling(which doesnt mean you will win). I mean a deck would need a ton of cards to ensure its winning(life gaining, Graveyard recusrion, protection for the card...) so i dont think its too good.
Your oppinion.
edit: It would be hellish fun in multiplayer(some want to protect you some hate you...)
edit 2: updated version.
Last edited by KeySam on Wed Dec 19, 2007 5:35 pm; edited 4 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Acid_Christ
Joined: 28 Aug 2004 Posts: 502
|
Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 11:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
| You could drop this, let your opponent think "hey, I can't lose. Sure, I will not block". Then Boomerang it back to your hand. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Craze
Joined: 30 Jan 2005 Posts: 5384 Location: Indiana, U
|
Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 12:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Acid_Christ wrote: | | You could drop this, let your opponent think "hey, I can't lose. Sure, I will not block". Then Boomerang it back to your hand. |
that would be rather obvious. If someone dropped this on me the first thing I'd think is taking it out, the second would be to protect my life. I'd more likely block if this were out rather then it not being. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rdeg87
Joined: 29 Apr 2007 Posts: 174
|
Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 12:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| It could pump my Tarmogoyf when its in your graveyard |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tenak
Joined: 16 Jul 2007 Posts: 39
|
Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 12:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The card is 100% broken. Wins the game on it's own against aggro/ midrange decks that can't deal with it (e.g. a deck like manaramp). You don't care if you can't win the game because on turn 80 when you have complete control you can have like 1 boomerang in the deck so you can bounce it and win. So basically what I am trying to point out that the deck you would play this card in doesn't care whether it can't win the game if it's in play.
Platinum angel isn't broken because it's a creature, and thus much easier to remove than an artifact. This card would force decks to be able to deal with artifacts main deck or die to anyone who chose to play it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Avata
Joined: 03 Dec 2006 Posts: 372
|
Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 12:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This card would never be printed purely on the basis that it would encourage games to go to turn 100.
The best use of this would probably be to play in a deck without any artifacts (so your opponents wouldn't bring in hate) and then play it game two out of your sb, forcing the match to end 1-0 you. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
KeySam
Joined: 14 Oct 2005 Posts: 539
|
Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 12:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
In my oppinion its just an other version of Worship, or Solitary Confiment. Those cards are very similar, ok they need another card to work but the idea is similar. The thing is, even if you can lose the game it doesnt means you win, if your at -200 life you need to not only get control also you need to get 200 life before you can return it. But maybe your right, its just an idea and vs control decks its almost an dead card... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Avata
Joined: 03 Dec 2006 Posts: 372
|
Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 3:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The important part about other "you can't lose the game" and the vast majority of "stall" type cards is that they either 1) involve keeping creatures in play, which are inherently fragile or 2) have a built in way of forcing you to end their effect - I.e. with confinement by itself you'll eventually run out of cards to discard, or with stasis you'll eventually run out of ways to get blue mana.
This thing just comes down and says "this game doesn't end until I say so." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
KeySam
Joined: 14 Oct 2005 Posts: 539
|
Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 3:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hmm then lets update it a bit.
2
Soft Lock
Artifact
No player can win or lose the game.
At the beginning of your upkeep sacrifice a permanent.
How about that i update it in the first post. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Avata
Joined: 03 Dec 2006 Posts: 372
|
Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 4:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sacrificing a permanent is probably too easy of a requirement to fulfill - theoretically the majority of your cards are going to be permanents of some kind. As it is, having to sac permanents could make this version slightly stronger, since it would then have a built in method of destroying itself. Still, it's workable. I would try one of these:
2
During your upkeep, sacrifice a nonland permanent.
or
1
During your upkeep, sacrifice a permanent with the lowest converted mana cost among permanents you control.
or
during your upkeep, sacrifice an artifact. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
KeySam
Joined: 14 Oct 2005 Posts: 539
|
Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 5:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I like the lowest version one. (it means basicly you start cutting your lands down). So i go with thatone. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
YTheAlien
Joined: 22 Mar 2007 Posts: 59
|
Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 5:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Any version of the card that lets you sacrifice a land combined with Crucible is disgusting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
KeySam
Joined: 14 Oct 2005 Posts: 539
|
Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 9:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| The same goes for confiment with eternal dragon(if opponent cant do anything) or with lftl + cycling lands). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
YTheAlien
Joined: 22 Mar 2007 Posts: 59
|
Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 9:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Except this is cheaper, colorless and covers more bases. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|