|
|
| Author |
Message |
KeySam
Joined: 14 Oct 2005
Posts: 545
|
 Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2007 3:47 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
| edit. Ah nvm i got it wrong. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tomi
Joined: 01 Jun 2007
Posts: 9
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2007 3:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
| what do you think about vindicate instead of threads?? it is good in non aggro mu too and you have only to change the manabase a little bit... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
lennin
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2007 3:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
raichoup
Joined: 12 Sep 2004
Posts: 14
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2007 1:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| tomi wrote: | | what do you think about vindicate instead of threads?? it is good in non aggro mu too and you have only to change the manabase a little bit... |
no way, the base of the deck UG, the rest is only splashed.
If you want to run a WB spell, then you need to totally rework the manabase. And it will have a cost (more lands needed).
Dosn't worth it imo. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mrmath
Joined: 30 Oct 2007
Posts: 3
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 02, 2007 11:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
| raichoup wrote: | | no way, the base of the deck UG, the rest is only splashed.If you want to run a WB spell, then you need to totally rework the manabase. And it will have a cost (more lands needed).Dosn't worth it imo. |
The lands have as many green sources as black ones as white ones and the md also runs as many black cards as green ones.
IMHO you can run vindicate instead of threads.
The trouble is sometimes you end up with u/w/b lands and you're holding cb/counterspell and that sucks =b
I'm going to try it both ways and see what I like. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MilanG[GER]
Joined: 10 May 2006
Posts: 58
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 6:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Jkornx3 wrote: | I am guessing Mono-red with Blood Moon or Magus of the Moon, wasn't an issue since he is running a total of 7 basics.
I honestly do not see why he would run the deck this way, 3 Sensai's seems unneeded, no removal, Chrome Mox to accel into what?
I just don't get it. I love seeing Counterbalence getting up there but I just don't get why run it this way. |
wtf lol
yes top sucks badly in counterbalance |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MilanG[GER]
Joined: 10 May 2006
Posts: 58
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 6:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
and for all the ppl saying "yeah he got lucky, everyone got sometime"
he's soooooooooo good
just that he for example forgets to use counterbalance when it's in play ( him not knowing his top cards ) against a 3 cc card ; twice!? forgetting to attack, asking for takeback and all that in a pt t8, hmmm... ( there were a few more things ) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
