|
|
| Author |
Message |
EKYakuza
Joined: 11 Mar 2007
Posts: 2
|
 Posted: Mon Mar 26, 2007 9:29 pm Post subject: Some help on making a better mono blue deck |
 |
|
I wanted some help with making a sideboard, and making the deck more competetive. The point of the deck is to ping and kill off enemy creatures or taking control of them and using them against my opponent. i know a burn deck and some other destructive cards would destroy this deck, i just don't know how to fight back against them.
// Lands
22 [TSP] Island (1)
// Creatures
2 [TSP] Fledgling Mawcor
2 [7E] Mawcor
2 [TE] Rootwater Hunter
2 [TSB] Prodigal Sorcerer
2 [CST] Zuran Spellcaster
2 [P3] Wu Longbowman
2 [UL] Thornwind Faeries
2 [MI] Suq'Ata Firewalker
4 [MM] Stinging Barrier
// Spells
4 [MR] Scythe of the Wretched
2 [8E] Bribery
4 [MM] Charisma
4 [FD] Vedalken Shackles
4 [TE] Legacy's Allure
4 [8E] Ensnaring Bridge |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Magx
Joined: 07 Sep 2004
Posts: 339
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 26, 2007 9:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| playing blue and no counterspells ? man... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BattleofWits
Joined: 03 Jun 2006
Posts: 206
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 26, 2007 10:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| 2 is the worst number in Magic. Play 4 of's of important cards. 3 of's of semi-important cards. And 1 of's of finishers or situational cards. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Taoofss
Joined: 22 Dec 2004
Posts: 308
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 26, 2007 10:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| seriously and easily could be the worst deck ever posted, even on the casual forum. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Taoofss
Joined: 22 Dec 2004
Posts: 308
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 26, 2007 10:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| BattleofWits wrote: | | 2 is the worst number in Magic. Play 4 of's of important cards. 3 of's of semi-important cards. And 1 of's of finishers or situational cards. |
not true, worst arguement ever. it depends on the deck contruction and what the card is. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
sc4rs
Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Posts: 405
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 26, 2007 11:02 pm Post subject: Re: Some help on making a better mono blue deck |
|
|
| EKYakuza wrote: |
// Creatures
2 [TSP] Fledgling Mawcor
2 [7E] Mawcor
2 [TE] Rootwater Hunter
2 [TSB] Prodigal Sorcerer
2 [CST] Zuran Spellcaster
2 [P3] Wu Longbowman
2 [UL] Thornwind Faeries
2 [MI] Suq'Ata Firewalker
4 [MM] Stinging Barrier
|
Of all the creatures to play 4 of, why in the world do you choose the one than A: can't attack in the off chance it needs to, B: actually costs mana to activate, and C: costs 4 mana for p/t stats that have been printed on a 1 mana artifact? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Egnirys
Joined: 31 Mar 2005
Posts: 92
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 26, 2007 11:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Truth is, it's very very difficult to make this deck works. Pinging deck is just too cumbersome and doesn't pack enough punch. If you really want to make the deck better the quick fix to forget about the pingers and just chuck in as many counterspells as you have. Mawcor can probably stay, add in some big creatures for the finish. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Magx
Joined: 07 Sep 2004
Posts: 339
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 5:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Taoofss wrote: | | BattleofWits wrote: | | 2 is the worst number in Magic. Play 4 of's of important cards. 3 of's of semi-important cards. And 1 of's of finishers or situational cards. |
not true, worst arguement ever. it depends on the deck contruction and what the card is. |
not true, worst arguement ever. It's one of the best advice ever given. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Taoofss
Joined: 22 Dec 2004
Posts: 308
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 8:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Magx wrote: | | Taoofss wrote: | | BattleofWits wrote: | | 2 is the worst number in Magic. Play 4 of's of important cards. 3 of's of semi-important cards. And 1 of's of finishers or situational cards. |
not true, worst arguement ever. it depends on the deck contruction and what the card is. |
not true, worst arguement ever. It's one of the best advice ever given. |
go into the masters deck data base, count all the 2 ofs, than the 3 ofs, than the 1 ofs and 4 ofs. the quantity of cards in a deck is dictated by its deck construction and typ, not by the logic that "2 is the worst number in magic" |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Magx
Joined: 07 Sep 2004
Posts: 339
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 1:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Taoofss wrote: | | Magx wrote: | | Taoofss wrote: | | BattleofWits wrote: | | 2 is the worst number in Magic. Play 4 of's of important cards. 3 of's of semi-important cards. And 1 of's of finishers or situational cards. |
not true, worst arguement ever. it depends on the deck contruction and what the card is. |
not true, worst arguement ever. It's one of the best advice ever given. |
go into the masters deck data base, count all the 2 ofs, than the 3 ofs, than the 1 ofs and 4 ofs. the quantity of cards in a deck is dictated by its deck construction and typ, not by the logic that "2 is the worst number in magic" |
actually you are right... 0 cards of a card that should be in a deck is the worst number  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
EKYakuza
Joined: 11 Mar 2007
Posts: 2
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 8:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| alright i'll just make a new deck. thanks for everyones. advice. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
