|
|
| Best deck ever? |
| Maybe |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| Sort of |
|
16% |
[ 1 ] |
| Perhaps |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| Doughnuts |
|
83% |
[ 5 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 6 |
|
| Author |
Message |
ecstasy
Joined: 12 May 2005
Posts: 7
|
 Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2005 11:31 am Post subject: |
 |
|
| EyeOfMadness wrote: | Word, dumb ass. I am only pointing out that the ability is activated. If I honestly thought that Stifle couldn't counter it, I would've added that in.
Why are people so dumb? |
Well, the Stifle version (which I humbly call Stifleveler) is more aggro and doesn't count on Beebles + Scepter, and this is a GREAT disadvantage.
I have my techs; just waiting for Ravnica to become legal. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gumonshoe
Joined: 15 Sep 2005
Posts: 416
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2005 11:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
your an idiot....
stifle! wow you ARE really bad at magic
mabee add a eater of days.... thats much better! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
EyeOfMadness
Joined: 12 Sep 2005
Posts: 91
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2005 11:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Most people in this thread are idiots. This is obviously a joke, so don't go crazy about it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Vodka_drink
Joined: 13 Mar 2005
Posts: 1152
Location: Brampton O
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2005 12:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
your joking right?...how the in hell can this be the best deck out there.....
Oh sorry....hehe...it was a joke or something...your still very very.....uh.....whats the word....not good?
vodka |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Flash
Joined: 31 Aug 2004
Posts: 5
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2005 12:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This is stupid.
Theoretically, it's the best deck ever. It can easilly prevent you from losing against every deck out there. Hardly any deck made can do that.
Yet everyone sees, it sucks.
It's real irony. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Beaner0000
Joined: 11 Aug 2005
Posts: 9
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2005 12:30 pm Post subject: HHmmmmm.... |
|
|
How is this a good deck??? I dont care if u call me a noob but y are there battle of the wits in there?
but if ur playing this in 1.5 it really wont win. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
snoopster
Joined: 04 Dec 2004
Posts: 651
Location: nj
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2005 12:49 pm Post subject: Re: HHmmmmm.... |
|
|
| Beaner0000 wrote: | How is this a good deck??? I dont care if u call me a noob but y are there battle of the wits in there?
but if ur playing this in 1.5 it really wont win. |
It's a good deck because by drawing only 2 cards, you can prevent yourself from losing.
Battle of Wits is in the deck because it wins you the game if you have 200 or more cards in your library.
I don't play this in T1.5. I play it in T1, a much slower format. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Trotsky1
Joined: 12 Apr 2005
Posts: 322
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2005 1:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| You Could add crystal sharad to your deck that way you could, play levler and quickly bounce it before anyone is able to do anything nasty to it. That way you could prob play leveler next go as well. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Vodka_drink
Joined: 13 Mar 2005
Posts: 1152
Location: Brampton O
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2005 1:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ok ...i honestly don't understand how this deck works...please tell me....
whats with the battle of wits and all the other cards in the wins section
vodka |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gumonshoe
Joined: 15 Sep 2005
Posts: 416
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2005 1:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| please explain! htis makes no scence |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
snoopster
Joined: 04 Dec 2004
Posts: 651
Location: nj
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2005 2:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| vodka_drink wrote: | ok ...i honestly don't understand how this deck works...please tell me....
whats with the battle of wits and all the other cards in the wins section
vodka |
-I already explained Battle of Wits.
-Relentless Rats are there because they get bigger when you play other ones.
-Scepter is there because if you make a mistake and put Orim's Chant in your deck for some reason, it's good.
-Island Fish Jasconius is a big beater.
-Mons Goblin Raiders are better than a 0/1. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Neo_Krausser
Joined: 30 Jul 2005
Posts: 216
Location: Your Bed
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2005 2:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I read the first 10-12 words in your first post...two words, NO EVIDENCE!!
"I am currently unbeaten with this deck. Sure, I haven't played any games with it yet, but being unbeaten certainly is something one cannot ignore." -Snoopster
...right, hmm. I wonder how your unbeaten, maybe because YOU HAVENT PLAYED ANY GAMES!!! this is retarded, get a life |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Neo_Krausser
Joined: 30 Jul 2005
Posts: 216
Location: Your Bed
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2005 2:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| oh, I almost forgot. Your poll is also stupid and pointless. Dont sort of, maybe, and perhaps mean the same thing?? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
snoopster
Joined: 04 Dec 2004
Posts: 651
Location: nj
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2005 2:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Neo_Krausser wrote: | I read the first 10-12 words in your first post...two words, NO EVIDENCE!!
"I am currently unbeaten with this deck. Sure, I haven't played any games with it yet, but being unbeaten certainly is something one cannot ignore." -Snoopster
...right, hmm. I wonder how your unbeaten, maybe because YOU HAVENT PLAYED ANY GAMES!!! this is retarded, get a life |
Oh my god! THIS WAS A JOKE!!!
How do you guys not understand this!?
The poll is a joke, too! Wow. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Baryonyx
Joined: 15 Feb 2005
Posts: 1026
Location: Illinois
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2005 4:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Talk about spam and a waste of forum space. Snoopster your an idiot.
IT WASNT FUNNY!!!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
