Magic-League.com Forum Index Magic-League.com
Forums of Magic-League: Free Online Magic: the Gathering Play with Apprentice and Magic Workstation; casual or tournament play.
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Land D (is it viable ?)



 
Reply to topic    Magic-League.com Forum Index -> Extended (1.x) Decks
Author Message
Magx



Joined: 07 Sep 2004
Posts: 339

PostPosted: Thu Feb 01, 2007 6:53 am    Post subject: Land D (is it viable ?) Reply with quote

Hi !

I just made this deck and I THINK (because I did not count the matches because of bad players that keep disconnecting) I'm unefeated. Anyway, it is simply a land destruction deck based on mana acceleration with kind of big creatures (3/3's and 4/4' and so on).

The only problem I see with this deck to this point is the lack of mass removal (Flamebreak ? ) and the lack of ressources vs Pro-red creatures.

here is the deck

// Lands //

4 Stomping Ground
4x Windswept Heath
4x Bloodstained Mire
4x Karplusan Forest
2x Forest
2x Mountain

// Creatures //

4x Birds of Paradise
4x Llanowar Elvex
4x Avalanche Riders
2x Eternal Witness
3x Rumbling Slum
3x Ravenous Baloth

// Spells //

4x Stone Rain
4x Wreak Havoc (absolutely incredible)
4x Char
4x Sudden Shock
3x Call of the Herd
1x Demon Fire

// Sideboard //

3x Krosan Grip
4x Tormod's Crypt
4x Dwarven Blast Miner
4x Defense Grid

*I m still tweaking with 2, 3, 4 copies of cards and some cards being either maindeck or sideboard (baloth, Dwarven Blast Miner, etc.). I don't lose against Flow because I can choose to get what lands and since I got kind of a lot of basic lands, it's not a problem since I also fetch them. I don't know a lot about Boros and I lost against control once, that is why I put Defense Grid in side.

What do you think ? no flaming plz , I don't do that so plz.. just constructive.. and I know that this deck is far from sucking
Back to top
Jacois



Joined: 05 Sep 2004
Posts: 456

PostPosted: Thu Feb 01, 2007 7:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ha! You have "kind of a lot of basic land"!!?? You have 4! Ha ha.

Anyways, sorry about that. Just take out all the duals and add 1 swamp and make it a flow deck. I'm sure that's what just about everyone reading this will think. With that many creatures maybe you should take out the chars for Jittes.
Back to top
Vodka_7up



Joined: 06 Oct 2004
Posts: 188

PostPosted: Thu Feb 01, 2007 9:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

try a land or green solution for creatures, say quicksand for pro red, or hail storm for an boros swarm. I strongly suggest Dwarvern Blastminer, that guy is a bomb if you can get him online, especially turn 2 with mox aid. Jacois raises a good point, well partically, bring in Flow's, they're ridiculous, but you don't have to make it a "flow deck." And char for jitte might be a good choice, since you do have an army of power. good job on the deck though (Y)
Back to top
Magx



Joined: 07 Sep 2004
Posts: 339

PostPosted: Thu Feb 01, 2007 11:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Vodka_7up wrote:
try a land or green solution for creatures, say quicksand for pro red, or hail storm for an boros swarm. I strongly suggest Dwarvern Blastminer, that guy is a bomb if you can get him online, especially turn 2 with mox aid. Jacois raises a good point, well partically, bring in Flow's, they're ridiculous, but you don't have to make it a "flow deck." And char for jitte might be a good choice, since you do have an army of power. good job on the deck though (Y)


First of all .. wow.. Vodka_7up that tells me "good job"

I got Blastminer in sideboard, that was not even questionnable (question is... side or maindeck ? I think side is better )

For the point of Jitte, do you mean that since I got big creature, they WILL deal damage anyways, so I ll get counters on it ?

thank you for Hail Storm I didn't even know that card existed.. I think that is what I was looking for

Thanks both of you for the comment... maybe I ll add black for some singular removal but maybe not with jitte maindeck.
Back to top
AKim



Joined: 11 Jul 2006
Posts: 3

PostPosted: Thu Feb 01, 2007 1:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

just play flow rock.
Back to top
gumonshoe



Joined: 15 Sep 2005
Posts: 433

PostPosted: Thu Feb 01, 2007 3:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ok i like the idea of jittes in the deck that will help vs en vecs
Back to top
Magx



Joined: 07 Sep 2004
Posts: 339

PostPosted: Thu Feb 01, 2007 3:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

AKim wrote:
just play flow rock.


Meh.
Back to top
kokusho6



Joined: 10 Jul 2005
Posts: 83

PostPosted: Thu Feb 01, 2007 4:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

maybe its just me but is the deck missing molten rain and pillage i think there way better than wreak havoc
Back to top
Magx



Joined: 07 Sep 2004
Posts: 339

PostPosted: Thu Feb 01, 2007 11:17 pm    Post subject: what about discard Reply with quote

What can I do about discard decks except crying (sideboarding wise)

and Wreak Havoc own totally more than pillage since they can'T be coutnered
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Magic-League.com Forum Index -> Extended (1.x) Decks All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Magic: the Gathering Cards

All content on this page may not be reproduced without consent of Magic-League Directors.
Magic the Gathering is TM and copyright Wizards of the Coast, Inc, a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc. All rights reserved.


About Us | Contact Us | Privacy Policy