 |
Magic-League.com Forums of Magic-League: Free Online tcg playing; casual or tournament play.
|
|
|
| Author |
Message |
faraway
Joined: 12 Nov 2006 Posts: 88 Location: Wouldn't y
|
Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 3:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Cool deck, but I don't think it could beat any viable t2 tier 1 combo deck(dragonstorm). Nor do I think it could beat a fast aggro, or a good control, in other words this deck is tier 2 at best. Keep at it, looks kool though.I'm also not very sure on why you are using hail storm, seems a bit useless, but please tell me why and prove me wrong. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pete278
Joined: 03 Jun 2005 Posts: 48
|
Posted: Thu Nov 16, 2006 1:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
| No, it does not run 41 lansds. It runs 31-35. If you want to insult something, know what you're talking about first. And if you read the topic found on site, you'd find out that was a bad version of the deck and you could find the link to good versions in it. The versions that ran 41-42 lands where terrible. The current ones aren't. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wkdclwn89
Joined: 05 Oct 2006 Posts: 96
|
Posted: Thu Nov 16, 2006 4:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
| If u were to add white it would be alot more viable, running 4 Firemane Angel in the Deck along with Peace of Minds and Sacred Mesas. Ill work on a list and post later. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chaosweaver
Joined: 07 Apr 2005 Posts: 1349 Location: Igloo town
|
Posted: Thu Nov 16, 2006 3:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| i cannot stress enough on how the old verision sans the azuza is better then most of the list that is being proposed |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|