Magic-League.com Forum Index Magic-League.com
Forums of Magic-League: Free Online Magic: the Gathering Play with Apprentice and Magic Workstation; casual or tournament play.
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Communication Breakdown


Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Reply to topic    Magic-League.com Forum Index -> Ravnica Block constructed (RBC)
Author Message
kendiggy



Joined: 30 Nov 2004
Posts: 295
Location: not here

PostPosted: Mon Jun 12, 2006 9:20 pm    Post subject: Communication Breakdown Reply with quote

Alright, here's a challenge for all you English Language and Linguistics experts out there:

I'm playing in a Rav block tourney. My opponent has Skeletal Vampire and two bats tokens in play. Not enough mana open to make more bats. I have Simic Skyswallower in play, Savage Twister and Electrolyze in my hand and enough mana to cast both of them. What I want to do is kill the vampire and all his tokens using only the three named cards. The best way that I can think of is twist for one, hope that he sacrifices only ONLY ONE bat token to put a regen sheild on the vampire, then swing with SSS, hope that he blocks, and then with damage on the stack, I electrolyze the vampire so that he takes the damage, regenerates and then dies from combat damage. What I don't want him to do is sacrifice both tokens to put two regen sheilds on the vampire, because then he will live through the combat damage as well.
So, I do it. I twist for one, but the problem comes when my opponent responds. He picks up both of his bat tokens, makes a slight motion with his hand towards the vampire and puts his tokens out of play. Now I don't know if his intent was to sac both tokens or just one. It makes a difference in the way this plays out. I need to ask him. The problem is, if I ask him, if he's a smart player, he'll prolly say both.

My question is: Assuming he's a smart player, how do I ask in such a way as to not make him think to sac both?
Back to top
wh33ls
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Jun 12, 2006 9:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

you are thinking to hard. I think the best way would be to simply say "what did that represent?" it makes him verify whether or not he has made 2 shields while also not let him on to the possibility he can if he hasn't thought of it already
Back to top
Guest






PostPosted: Mon Jun 12, 2006 9:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

when the vampire regen triggers from the electrolyze, the combat damage will be removed as part of the regeneration. the regen removes all damage from it, taps it, and removes from combat if its in combat
Back to top
kendiggy



Joined: 30 Nov 2004
Posts: 295
Location: not here

PostPosted: Mon Jun 12, 2006 10:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Damage has already been assigned and put on the stack. He'll take lethal damage twice. I confirmed this with a judge.

Anyways, I think I figured it out. I think you have to put the words in his mouth. You have to say "Just one, right?" Then all he has to say is yes or no. Trick him into saying it. If you say it casually, he won't think anything of it until it's too late. Sales tactics. That's why people hate salesmen.
The only drawback is if you don't do it in front of a judge, you end up looking like a total dickhead calling him on it when he realizes it.
Back to top
Strovil



Joined: 11 Mar 2005
Posts: 575

PostPosted: Mon Jun 12, 2006 10:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

"Just one" is an immediately clue in to the number. You have communicated that the number matters by not only stating a number but also confirming that it was "just one", indicating it could have been more.

The correct Jedi Mind Trick would be "A regen shield?" in the right tone. Now you have indicated it in general terms while surreptitiously limiting it to one shield instead of two when he says "Yes."
Back to top
Guest






PostPosted: Mon Jun 12, 2006 11:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

kendiggy wrote:
Damage has already been assigned and put on the stack. He'll take lethal damage twice. I confirmed this with a judge.

Anyways, I think I figured it out. I think you have to put the words in his mouth. You have to say "Just one, right?" Then all he has to say is yes or no. Trick him into saying it. If you say it casually, he won't think anything of it until it's too late. Sales tactics. That's why people hate salesmen.
The only drawback is if you don't do it in front of a judge, you end up looking like a total dickhead calling him on it when he realizes it.

You are a scrub if you need to do shady shit like this to win. Stop trying to be slick and play smarter through the whole match. If you weren't so busy trying to basically cheat you might notice the best move is probobaly to hold back, Electolyze the Bats during his next turn, then Savage on your next turn and swing. That way if he catches onto your retarded attempt at trickery you still come through with Simic damage and a possible 2/3 for one Twister next turn.
Your way best outcome = you use Twister + Electo and hit him if he doesn't play another flying creature next turn.
otherwise you just wasted a savage twister to kill 2 bats he can block + regen and have his choice of attack you or hold back and block next turn.
My way = Unless he plays another Vampire or draws discard he's taking a beating next turn after I wipe his board and either way I'm in a better position then if he calls your bluff and double regenerates.
Back to top
Guest






PostPosted: Mon Jun 12, 2006 11:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Strovil wrote:
"Just one" is an immediately clue in to the number. You have communicated that the number matters by not only stating a number but also confirming that it was "just one", indicating it could have been more.

The correct Jedi Mind Trick would be "A regen shield?" in the right tone. Now you have indicated it in general terms while surreptitiously limiting it to one shield instead of two when he says "Yes."

Then when it comes time for your gay little trick you try to call him out and he tells the judge "yeah I motioned to the Vampire with both my bats, he said for a regen shield, I said yeah... Obviosly both for a regen shield." Now what side do you think the judge is going to take.
Back to top
MeddlingMatt



Joined: 09 Mar 2006
Posts: 71

PostPosted: Mon Jun 12, 2006 11:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

While not having an ethical problem with such an honest question as yours, Kendiggy, I see Strovil's answer as dodgy. The two "slight motion"s seem to indicate that he's already put two shields around his Vampire. A question like "just one, right?" is the best you can do, hoping that he agree's (sales tactic indeed); against a player you don't think is good enough to do that, just a "what does that mean" would probably be better.

But if you were to use Strovil's plan, you may very well find yourself arguing the wrong side against someone who had already gestured both his bats towards his Vampire, and using the argument that "I said A regen shield!" on the judge.
Back to top
Guest






PostPosted: Tue Jun 13, 2006 5:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Anonymous wrote:
kendiggy wrote:
Damage has already been assigned and put on the stack. He'll take lethal damage twice. I confirmed this with a judge.

Anyways, I think I figured it out. I think you have to put the words in his mouth. You have to say "Just one, right?" Then all he has to say is yes or no. Trick him into saying it. If you say it casually, he won't think anything of it until it's too late. Sales tactics. That's why people hate salesmen.
The only drawback is if you don't do it in front of a judge, you end up looking like a total dickhead calling him on it when he realizes it.

You are a scrub if you need to do shady shit like this to win. Stop trying to be slick and play smarter through the whole match. If you weren't so busy trying to basically cheat you might notice the best move is probobaly to hold back, Electolyze the Bats during his next turn, then Savage on your next turn and swing. That way if he catches onto your retarded attempt at trickery you still come through with Simic damage and a possible 2/3 for one Twister next turn.
Your way best outcome = you use Twister + Electo and hit him if he doesn't play another flying creature next turn.
otherwise you just wasted a savage twister to kill 2 bats he can block + regen and have his choice of attack you or hold back and block next turn.
My way = Unless he plays another Vampire or draws discard he's taking a beating next turn after I wipe his board and either way I'm in a better position then if he calls your bluff and double regenerates.


NOT A SCRUB AT ALL... I remember back in 98 or so, during worlds or some such match, when one of the prolific players of the day asked " are you done" and passed his ability to do any "fast effects" (remember those?) and losing the game because of it. It's like when you leave 2 islands untapped with no counterspells in your hand. Or you swing w/ your llanowar elves when they have a larger creature out but they don't block 'cause they are not sure what is in your hand. It's like 10000 spoons when all you need is a knife..... But what Im saying is this: Winning is about winning. Period. Not about how elegantly you do it. Otherwise there would be no Owling mine or burn decks out there.
Back to top
Guest






PostPosted: Tue Jun 13, 2006 5:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Did i mention I hate "guest" status. Why did they do that to me in the last post...
Back to top
the_guy_123



Joined: 08 Jun 2005
Posts: 130
Location: Quebec

PostPosted: Tue Jun 13, 2006 6:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Don't regeneration shields last until end of turn?
Back to top
Guest






PostPosted: Tue Jun 13, 2006 6:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Anonymous wrote:
It's like 10000 spoons when all you need is a knife..... But what Im saying is this: Winning is about winning. Period. Not about how elegantly you do it. Otherwise there would be no Owling mine or burn decks out there.


Best line ever: my thoughts Exactly !

Winning = Winning

and

Whining = Whining
Back to top
Flashstorm



Joined: 26 Sep 2005
Posts: 9

PostPosted: Tue Jun 13, 2006 9:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Think of it logically. If the player had no other uses for the second bat, and he is able to understand that he needs to sac one, why wouldnt he sac both? The bats will get RFG anyway, any player smart enought to realise that he should take advantage of the first bat will take advantage of the second too.
Back to top
Guest






PostPosted: Tue Jun 13, 2006 9:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
kendiggy wrote:
Damage has already been assigned and put on the stack. He'll take lethal damage twice. I confirmed this with a judge.

Anyways, I think I figured it out. I think you have to put the words in his mouth. You have to say "Just one, right?" Then all he has to say is yes or no. Trick him into saying it. If you say it casually, he won't think anything of it until it's too late. Sales tactics. That's why people hate salesmen.
The only drawback is if you don't do it in front of a judge, you end up looking like a total dickhead calling him on it when he realizes it.

You are a scrub if you need to do shady shit like this to win. Stop trying to be slick and play smarter through the whole match. If you weren't so busy trying to basically cheat you might notice the best move is probobaly to hold back, Electolyze the Bats during his next turn, then Savage on your next turn and swing. That way if he catches onto your retarded attempt at trickery you still come through with Simic damage and a possible 2/3 for one Twister next turn.
Your way best outcome = you use Twister + Electo and hit him if he doesn't play another flying creature next turn.
otherwise you just wasted a savage twister to kill 2 bats he can block + regen and have his choice of attack you or hold back and block next turn.
My way = Unless he plays another Vampire or draws discard he's taking a beating next turn after I wipe his board and either way I'm in a better position then if he calls your bluff and double regenerates.


NOT A SCRUB AT ALL... I remember back in 98 or so, during worlds or some such match, when one of the prolific players of the day asked " are you done" and passed his ability to do any "fast effects" (remember those?) and losing the game because of it. It's like when you leave 2 islands untapped with no counterspells in your hand. Or you swing w/ your llanowar elves when they have a larger creature out but they don't block 'cause they are not sure what is in your hand. It's like 10000 spoons when all you need is a knife..... But what Im saying is this: Winning is about winning. Period. Not about how elegantly you do it. Otherwise there would be no Owling mine or burn decks out there.

The point? All the examples you list are mind games or a crucial play error on the part of w/e pro. The difference being instead of using play skill and mind games (as in the counterspell or elves example) you are basically compensating for a lack of playskill by trying to twist the english language in such a way that your opponent thinks he is saccing both bats but technically agrees to only saccing one so you can then rules lawyer him with a judge into a detrimental ruling.
In the end though it's better to just do it the way I listed. That way when your opponent is like "I sac both bats to the Vampire" you don't look like a complete idiot when you could have made about 5 better plays.
Back to top
Guest






PostPosted: Tue Jun 13, 2006 2:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rules lawyer? Rules are rules for a reason; so you can use them to your advantage.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Magic-League.com Forum Index -> Ravnica Block constructed (RBC) All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Magic: the Gathering Cards

All content on this page may not be reproduced without consent of Magic-League Directors.
Magic the Gathering is TM and copyright Wizards of the Coast, Inc, a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc. All rights reserved.


About Us | Contact Us | Privacy Policy