1700- trials who is in favor?

THE_PREDATOR · Joined: 20 Apr 2005 Posts: 93

Separate but Equal? I think that either way it will make people unhappy, so they admins should make a decision quick and just stick to it. I think 1700- trials are a great way to build your rating, tho.

PV · Joined: 17 Sep 2004 Posts: 77

1700- trials are awful ways to get rating since all the ppl have poor rating

Isn't it obvious?

Draconis · Joined: 03 Sep 2004 Posts: 27

I dont agree with -1700 trial because in my opinion its rewarding people for not being good. If there sould be restrictions it should be +1700. I at the moment only have 1660 rating but ppl should be rewarded for having high rating not punished

NahHolmes · Joined: 13 Jan 2005 Posts: 588

What a retarded idea. Oh well I can see that to much crying was going on. So now we cater to scrubs for the INVITATIONAL. Most people don't seem to get that trials are all about getting byes in the Masters or invites. Now someone who is good enough to have a 1700+ rating but doesn't play much will get rewarded with an invite, either that or someone will break out account #2 and go to town.

WildCard · Joined: 06 Sep 2004 Posts: 735 Location: Japan

no more arguing. I will talk to someone about this stuff. dont worry about it. mor flaming will turn into a ban from site and channel ect... subject dropped

Koen · Administrator Joined: 10 Mar 2004 Posts: 338

The vote is now in favor of "Hell No".

The 1700- Trial is now made into a Trial open for everyone.

Tks for voting.