 |
Magic-League.com
Forums of Magic-League: Free Online Magic: the Gathering Play with Apprentice and Magic Workstation; casual or tournament play.
|
|
|
| Author |
Message |
Guest
|
 Posted: Wed Mar 29, 2006 1:13 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
it was only a winter's tale
just another winter's tale
so why should the world take notice
of one more love that's failed?
-moody blues, december |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ElvishGod
Joined: 12 May 2005
Posts: 2924
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 29, 2006 2:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| CrossMyMind wrote: | one word:
gullible |
indeed.
your all so gullible. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 29, 2006 9:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ElvishGod wrote: | | CrossMyMind wrote: | one word:
gullible |
indeed.
your all so gullible. |
If anyone had actually beleived it, which noone did. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
h0m3r
Joined: 05 Sep 2004
Posts: 114
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 30, 2006 4:37 am Post subject: Re: New Flying Rule |
|
|
| snoopster wrote: | Did u guys hear about the new flying rule that's rumored to come into effect June 1st?
According to mtgsalvation.com, creature with flying all gain banding and cumulative upkeep 2. This news from DCI dude Andy Heckt:
When I think of flying in real life, I think of birds banding together against difficult weather. I also think of having to pay more every upkeep to keep these beautiful creatures alive.
I personally don't mind the change; the loss of power in the creatures from cumulative upkeep is easily made up for with banding.
Thoughts? |
sounds almost like a misetings article making fun of mtgsalvation |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
