|
|
| Author |
Message |
DJTech
Joined: 19 Dec 2004 Posts: 81 Location: ROVA
|
Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2006 7:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I think it's funny how this thread created to bash the deck has turned into yet ANOTHER thread about Owl.dec... Way to go COOLBOY, good job. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
red_horse
Joined: 05 Nov 2005 Posts: 13
|
Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2006 9:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
| den18 wrote: | | i am too however having trouble with aggro I think Ill have more trouble when guildpact comes out and zoo will be prominent any ideas? |
im currently testing with storage matrix, since all u care about is ur lands.. it can delay aggro, plus with exhaustion.. aggro would then choose to attack or to expand.. thats what aggro usually does.. attack and expand, but if he cant do both at the same turn, then u got urself a lot of time to set up for the kill. if he chooses to untap creatures, then u bounce it.. if he chooses to expand, then remand it..
wat u think??? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
upsanddowns
Joined: 04 Feb 2006 Posts: 15
|
Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2006 10:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
lol i just posted how horrible this deck was in a nother forum titled owl impact i think. ummmm. here--
quote equals me
this deck is horrible. i've played against it so many times and trounced it. any one who matters is playing either seed spark, putrefy, naturalize or wear away, and you're guaranteeing them those cards with crescent moon and mine, last time i checked glare was an aggro deck with 2 of those 4 spells. hmmmmm maybe you crumble to that alot? or maybe greater good gifts? which will just lock you turn five anyway....
also what happens if cranial gets ya?
| NahHolmes wrote: | | Man this deck is for scrubs. |
correct. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
snoopster
Joined: 04 Dec 2004 Posts: 651 Location: nj
|
Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2006 11:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
| teamforsaken, beating a couple of people on m-l using the deck doesn't make it bad. You have no clue what you are talking about. When it gets multiple top 64 finishes etc at the pt, then you can reconsider. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DJTech
Joined: 19 Dec 2004 Posts: 81 Location: ROVA
|
Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2006 12:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I may or may not play this deck at the PT... laugh. This, Zoo, or BW control... maybe UR Magnivore. I hate this format. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
upsanddowns
Joined: 04 Feb 2006 Posts: 15
|
Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2006 12:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| snoopster wrote: | | teamforsaken, beating a couple of people on m-l using the deck doesn't make it bad. You have no clue what you are talking about. When it gets multiple top 64 finishes etc at the pt, then you can reconsider. |
you cant be serious....i dont play kids on M-L, i've tested the deck with teammates...its just not good. kids at my fnm play this deck and get trounced, sure you'll just say they're bad players, which im not going to lie, some are. but we've had a fair share of better players playing this deck, and it just doesnt win. im sick of posting all this stuff in two different forums so i'm just going to stop replying here. any further input by me will be in the u/r owl impact forum. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
snoopster
Joined: 04 Dec 2004 Posts: 651 Location: nj
|
Posted: Fri Mar 03, 2006 4:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| u guys are such retards, especially coolboy. owl.dec is all over the pt! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Feckingnewb
Joined: 01 Oct 2004 Posts: 34
|
Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2006 10:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
| they errated ebony owl, its a yu-gi-oh card now |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
blkaznguy4
Joined: 04 Jun 2005 Posts: 96
|
Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2006 2:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Feckingnewb wrote: | | they errated ebony owl, its a yu-gi-oh card now |
o.O really??? i wanna add it to my yu gi oh deck ...
yes i play it ... its fun to woop them at their own game when they insult magic ^.^  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
vaj
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 5
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hawkins
Joined: 17 Oct 2005 Posts: 71
|
Posted: Wed Mar 08, 2006 9:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I liked this deck when the format was new because most ppl will make control decks just they know they have a good match up VS the aggro decks. But now that the PT was won by a RG Beats deck and ZOO took second I don't know that it will be any good anymore. 2 weeks ago any owl deck made top 8 at the FNM here and there was only one here. Last week there were 3 here and 2 went 0-2 drop and the last one barely missed top 8 due to facing the zoo deck. I think if you are gonna play this deck you have to know what you are gonna be facing. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tomf
Joined: 04 Jan 2005 Posts: 14
|
Posted: Fri Mar 10, 2006 3:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Uhm... I can't remeber who I beat playing owl.dec today. Oh, now I remember. It was blueboy.
So far today I'm 9-0 with owl.dec (11-0 if u count byes) I have had a fair share of luck, but it's a decent deck. Almost auto win against control. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NahHolmes
Joined: 13 Jan 2005 Posts: 561
|
Posted: Fri Mar 10, 2006 9:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I haven't seen this deck anywhere. I can only assume the massive influx of good aggro taught most of the league Owl players a valuable lesson on playing a metagame deck in the wrong metagame. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
COOLBOY
Joined: 03 Jul 2005 Posts: 424
|
Posted: Sat Mar 11, 2006 1:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
| tomf wrote: | Uhm... I can't remeber who I beat playing owl.dec today. Oh, now I remember. It was blueboy.
So far today I'm 9-0 with owl.dec (11-0 if u count byes) I have had a fair share of luck, but it's a decent deck. Almost auto win against control. |
I'll play my magnivore against any owl deck. I doubt I'll win EVERY match but should at least go 5-1 or so. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|