Magic-League.com Forum Index Magic-League.com
Forums of Magic-League: Free Online tcg playing; casual or tournament play.
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

CaC 357


Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Reply to topic    Magic-League.com Forum Index -> Other - Magic
Author Message
radioactivez



Joined: 14 Aug 2015
Posts: 270

PostPosted: Fri Jul 08, 2016 9:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

oh ok. so i am automatically disqualified from this because of how I play. noted. Not mad. I narrow my thinking because it makes me a better player to only focus on the formats that I am involved in.
Back to top
Morpheus2222



Joined: 04 Sep 2004
Posts: 37

PostPosted: Fri Jul 08, 2016 1:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

FootClamp 2

Artifact-Equipment Rare

Equipped Creature gets +2/-2

Whenever you attach Footclamp to a creature draw a card

Equip Sacrifice a creature

"Ouch my toe!" - Goblin


Last edited by Morpheus2222 on Sat Jul 09, 2016 1:36 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
Marcus675



Joined: 07 Mar 2016
Posts: 29

PostPosted: Fri Jul 08, 2016 2:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Lord, Manamorphse is better in every way, because you can choose any combo of colors, and your thing is the same thing but with more mana restrictions and less flexibility with replacing itself(mana-wise)
Lord_Cuddles wrote:
Quote:
Fuel to the Flame
Uncommon
RG
Instant

Draw a card.
Add one mana of any color and {R} to your mana pool.

"More Lumber! Let's keep the fire burning until nightfall!"


It'd be printed because of the color restrictions on the card. But guess who'd abuse it......
[/quote]
Back to top
GreenBear



Joined: 27 Jul 2010
Posts: 885

PostPosted: Fri Jul 08, 2016 2:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

radioactivez wrote:
oh ok. so i am automatically disqualified from this because of how I play. noted. Not mad. I narrow my thinking because it makes me a better player to only focus on the formats that I am involved in.


But he has not made any allusion to any specific format.


Last edited by GreenBear on Fri Jul 08, 2016 2:38 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
Lord_Cuddles



Joined: 25 Sep 2015
Posts: 156

PostPosted: Fri Jul 08, 2016 3:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Drawing comes first.
Then you choose.
Back to top
Stucco



Joined: 16 Feb 2016
Posts: 45

PostPosted: Fri Jul 08, 2016 3:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Explosive Reaction.........UR
Instant ............................U

Choose two -
Tap or untap two target permanents.
Explosive Reaction deals 2 damage to target creature or player.
Draw two cards then discard a card.

If you aren't part of the solution, then you're part of the precipitate.


Last edited by Stucco on Sat Jul 09, 2016 7:21 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
radioactivez



Joined: 14 Aug 2015
Posts: 270

PostPosted: Fri Jul 08, 2016 7:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

GreenBear wrote:
radioactivez wrote:
oh ok. so i am automatically disqualified from this because of how I play. noted. Not mad. I narrow my thinking because it makes me a better player to only focus on the formats that I am involved in.


But he has not made any allusion to any specific format.


No but like WOTC I do not consider modern and legacy and vintage to even exist. so if a card would be broken in those formats i would not notice. hence why treasure cruise was trash in my eyes as it was over costed in standard and in draft.

Morpheus.. honestly reading your card it just Seems BAD.
Back to top
Morpheus2222



Joined: 04 Sep 2004
Posts: 37

PostPosted: Sat Jul 09, 2016 1:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

fixed the card i wanted the sac a critter outlet but figured it would be too broken but maybe not
Back to top
AxiomBlurr



Joined: 11 Jul 2010
Posts: 411

PostPosted: Sat Jul 09, 2016 4:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

radioactivez wrote:
GreenBear wrote:
radioactivez wrote:
oh ok. so i am automatically disqualified from this because of how I play. noted. Not mad. I narrow my thinking because it makes me a better player to only focus on the formats that I am involved in.


But he has not made any allusion to any specific format.


No but like WOTC I do not consider modern and legacy and vintage to even exist. so if a card would be broken in those formats i would not notice. hence why treasure cruise was trash in my eyes as it was over costed in standard and in draft.

Morpheus.. honestly reading your card it just Seems BAD.


WOTC obviously do consider modern and vintage and legacy as existing when designing cards, that is the main reason only approx. 6-8 cards every set released truly influence those formats. To imagine otherwise is a great oversight.
Back to top
AxiomBlurr



Joined: 11 Jul 2010
Posts: 411

PostPosted: Sun Jul 10, 2016 6:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Judging in 10 hours or so.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Magic-League.com Forum Index -> Other - Magic All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group

All content on this page may not be reproduced without consent of Magic-League Directors.
Magic the Gathering is TM and copyright Wizards of the Coast, Inc, a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc. All rights reserved.


About Us | Contact Us | Privacy Policy