Magic-League.com Forum Index Magic-League.com
Forums of Magic-League: Free Online tcg playing; casual or tournament play.
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

2 decks. You'd play which one?


Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Reply to topic    Magic-League.com Forum Index -> Standard (T2) Decks
Author Message
OldBear



Joined: 12 Apr 2005
Posts: 1840

PostPosted: Fri Nov 27, 2009 12:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanik wrote:
'Too slow, run more 6cc dragons' wut?


Good point, well made.
Back to top
Thanik



Joined: 31 Jan 2009
Posts: 101

PostPosted: Fri Nov 27, 2009 1:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Trotsky1 wrote:
Thanik wrote:
'Too slow, run more 6cc dragons' wut?


Good point, well made.


Well, I don't disagree with him, broodmate is a beating. Just saying maybe he isn't making his point too clearly Razz
Back to top
SJM



Joined: 17 Apr 2009
Posts: 415

PostPosted: Fri Nov 27, 2009 6:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Try 2 rampant's and 2 rangers.

But if you're going the ranger/master of the wild hunt route, plan 2 oran rief main deck.
Back to top
JustKenny



Joined: 28 Sep 2008
Posts: 103

PostPosted: Fri Nov 27, 2009 10:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I would run the jund version but cut the siege gang for 2 garruk- 2 Broodmate then put in the oran rief lands. also the borderland is no good cut them for sign in blood it will help late game and keep the deck rolling even after a blighting.
Back to top
SJM



Joined: 17 Apr 2009
Posts: 415

PostPosted: Sat Nov 28, 2009 4:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

maddawg wrote:
I would run the jund version but cut the siege gang for 2 garruk- 2 Broodmate then put in the oran rief lands. also the borderland is no good cut them for sign in blood it will help late game and keep the deck rolling even after a blighting.


Sign in blood has been tried. Jund doesn't like doing damage to itself and cascade is enough card advantage.
Back to top
JustKenny



Joined: 28 Sep 2008
Posts: 103

PostPosted: Sun Nov 29, 2009 11:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

SJM i am going to have to disagree with you on that one. You can't say that "Jund doesn't like doing damage to itself" IT RUNS LEECH! lol his build does not run leech so the pain from sign in blood is not that bad in comparison to what it would do to regular jund. And IMO there is no such thing as enough card advantage.
Back to top
SJM



Joined: 17 Apr 2009
Posts: 415

PostPosted: Sun Nov 29, 2009 6:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Eh.

I think you could cut 4 leeches for 3 sign in blood and 1 something else (probably a 4th pulse or 3rd terminate).

I just think rampant growth is better if you're cutting leeches because it lets you run 4 bit blast which is amazing and 4 broodmates which end games.
Back to top
Vodka_drink



Joined: 13 Mar 2005
Posts: 1145
Location: Brampton O

PostPosted: Sun Nov 29, 2009 8:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

SJM wrote:
Both versions are too slow.

You're running borderland ranger over rampant growth which is awful for a lot of reasons.

.


I would run Ranger over Growth because ranger in theory could be a 2 for 1 and with so much jund hate out there i like my deck to be full with 2f1s
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Magic-League.com Forum Index -> Standard (T2) Decks All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group

All content on this page may not be reproduced without consent of Magic-League Directors.
Magic the Gathering is TM and copyright Wizards of the Coast, Inc, a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc. All rights reserved.


About Us | Contact Us | Privacy Policy