|
|
| Author |
Message |
gwapings
Joined: 16 Oct 2008 Posts: 15
|
Posted: Sat Sep 26, 2009 4:24 pm Post subject: twincast and banefire |
|
|
| banefire for 1 million, twincast, copy for a million? seems wrong... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Vedrfolner
Joined: 04 Apr 2006 Posts: 2140
|
Posted: Sat Sep 26, 2009 4:32 pm Post subject: Re: twincast and banefire |
|
|
| gwapings wrote: | | banefire for 1 million, twincast, copy for a million? seems wrong... |
Why wouldn't you just repeat the infinite mana combo a million times more and hit with a 2 million Banefire? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
styx^
Joined: 17 Mar 2005 Posts: 66
|
Posted: Sat Sep 26, 2009 4:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| he's maybe thinking of a situation where the OTHER player twincasts it... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
KnockouT
Joined: 25 May 2005 Posts: 32
|
Posted: Sun Sep 27, 2009 2:35 am Post subject: Re: twincast and banefire |
|
|
| Vedrfolner wrote: | | gwapings wrote: | | banefire for 1 million, twincast, copy for a million? seems wrong... |
Why wouldn't you just repeat the infinite mana combo a million times more and hit with a 2 million Banefire? |
or maybe he wants to kill TWO players. ;D |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mr_Eko
Joined: 15 Aug 2009 Posts: 28
|
Posted: Sun Sep 27, 2009 4:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
| when you twin cast a spell with "X" you have to pay the X, so if you banefire for 1 mil, u better have 1 mil mana for the twin cast |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mTk-Away
Joined: 02 Apr 2005 Posts: 86
|
Posted: Sun Sep 27, 2009 6:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Mr_Eko wrote: | | when you twin cast a spell with "X" you have to pay the X, so if you banefire for 1 mil, u better have 1 mil mana for the twin cast |
Except that you don't. Copying a spell in stack copies all characterestics of the spell, including X. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
KnockouT
Joined: 25 May 2005 Posts: 32
|
Posted: Sun Sep 27, 2009 2:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Mr_Eko wrote: | | when you twin cast a spell with "X" you have to pay the X, so if you banefire for 1 mil, u better have 1 mil mana for the twin cast |
No.. The spell is on the stack already and therefore the X has been determined. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DoomBring3r
Joined: 30 Apr 2009 Posts: 436
|
Posted: Mon Sep 28, 2009 7:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
| All aboard, this thread is hopping in the train set to the failroad! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jonproject
Joined: 22 Dec 2007 Posts: 432
|
Posted: Mon Sep 28, 2009 8:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Banefire for a million in standard? Dis must be my rucky day! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jonproject
Joined: 22 Dec 2007 Posts: 432
|
Posted: Mon Sep 28, 2009 8:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
| All things aside, I think this belongs in the Magic Rulings section. The more you know. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|