|
|
| Author |
Message |
varno345
Joined: 14 Feb 2007
Posts: 116
|
 Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2008 1:41 pm Post subject: Citanul Flute.dec |
 |
|
| do u think that this is a viable card outside of a limited/casual play? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
boeda
Joined: 21 Dec 2007
Posts: 79
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2008 2:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ehm, where's the .dec?
build something and test it.. then post it.. we test it.. and share thoughts! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
varno345
Joined: 14 Feb 2007
Posts: 116
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2008 2:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
here's the decklist.
3 flooded grove
6 forest
3 fire-lit thicket
2 wooded bastion
4 plains
4 reflecting pool
2 forbidding watchtower
1 flameblast dragon
2 stoic angel
2 battlegrace angel
1 realm razor
4 llanowar elves
3 windborn muse
4 skyshroud ranger
4 chameleon collossus
2 woodfall primus
2 reveillark
4 citanul flute
3 bant charm
4 fertile ground
sideboard still pending. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ik
Joined: 11 Sep 2007
Posts: 286
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2008 3:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| So... Essentially... It is a ramp variant with the flute as a search engine? Seems like a good idea but some of the numbers look a little off.... Id suggest adding Garruk for extra synergy with the fertile grounds and possibly Rampant Growth? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Chaos182
Joined: 02 Nov 2008
Posts: 1
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2008 3:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| wow the deck seems alright, but the worst card is the flute itself! It is soo ridiculously slow it is outrageous. It is not good for the format right now because it is just too slow. Even with mana acceleration u can pump it out fairly fast, but then u must pay the mana for the huge guys that u have to search for then the mana to play the guys themselves. Gift of the Gargantuan is an infinitely better card in almost every aspect: it costs much less, it gets u a land and a creature(which helps u play the creature that u searched 4), and it's easier to play the things u get from it that same turn. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
varno345
Joined: 14 Feb 2007
Posts: 116
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2008 3:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| yeah i think the flute would be better if it put the creatures into play. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ik
Joined: 11 Sep 2007
Posts: 286
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2008 4:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| It doesnt put creatures into play?!?!? wow... that card is terrible xD |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Spyx
Joined: 31 Oct 2004
Posts: 1009
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2008 4:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| primal command > flute |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ik
Joined: 11 Sep 2007
Posts: 286
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2008 4:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Spyx wrote: | | primal command > flute |
Yep... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
blitzer2k7
Joined: 12 Jul 2007
Posts: 112
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2008 9:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ik wrote: | | Spyx wrote: | | primal command > flute |
Yep... |
It is better in the sense you get to look for one creature card, flute does offer the possibility to look for creatures much more often...I think flute would be much better suited finding big drops that are more cost efficient ie wolly thoctor or chameleon colossus |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
varno345
Joined: 14 Feb 2007
Posts: 116
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 12:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| i agree because essentially flute gives multiple searches of the "little" more efficient creatures and lets u draw into the big bomb like woodfall primus. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
