Magic-League.com Forum Index Magic-League.com
Forums of Magic-League: Free Online tcg playing; casual or tournament play.
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Bw Aggro. Tis good :)



 
Reply to topic    Magic-League.com Forum Index -> Standard (T2) Decks
Author Message
jebus911



Joined: 01 Sep 2008
Posts: 31

PostPosted: Thu Oct 16, 2008 10:28 pm    Post subject: Bw Aggro. Tis good :) Reply with quote

4x thoughtseize
4x nip gwylion
4x Nightsky Mimic
4x Stillmoon cavalier
4x tidehollow Skuller

4x Bitterblossom
4x Edge of the Divinity
3x O-Ring
4x Unmake

2x Loxodon warhammer
1x Profane command

2x Mutavault
4x Plains
9x Swamp
4x caves of koilos
3x Fetid heath


SB:
4x WOG
4x Forgetender
1x O-Ring
1x Profane command
3x Revilark
2x deathbringer liege


Comments? Questions? Shoot away. In the aggro match it becomes control. In the control match, its soooo disruptive.
Back to top
kfcman



Joined: 16 Sep 2006
Posts: 733

PostPosted: Thu Oct 16, 2008 10:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

You know what seems hot?
Playing blue in this deck.
Deft duelist is a swell 2 drop that causes problems in both aggro and control matchups.
Tower gargoyle gives you a big flying body for cheap which is great against most decks in general.
Counter spells are always good in aggro control.
versatility of spells like esper charm and agony warp even if just out of the board are great additions. agony warp really changes the combat step to make your dudes just the bee's knees against creature decks and charm is good against many things.

not a huge fan of edge of divinity or mimic.
Back to top
Xarls



Joined: 21 Jul 2008
Posts: 18

PostPosted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 7:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

all ur creatures are small, why not divinity of pride
Back to top
jebus911



Joined: 01 Sep 2008
Posts: 31

PostPosted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 10:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Because you don't need it. The amount of disruption lets you play the small creatures as opposed to the bigger ones. Keeping the curve low is good.
Back to top
jebus911



Joined: 01 Sep 2008
Posts: 31

PostPosted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 1:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Have you ever played with nip? It plays phenomenally.. Divinity has 12 targets
Back to top
caesarthehun



Joined: 27 Jun 2006
Posts: 186

PostPosted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 5:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nip is good, but this deck, if played vs a decent cruelQnT will get reamed. Bant charm and esper charm alone destroys any early lead you get with BB or a divinty enchanted creature, later on, any attempts to play an ultimatum or command will go untouched becuase you play no blue.
needs more blue
Back to top
kfcman



Joined: 16 Sep 2006
Posts: 733

PostPosted: Sat Oct 18, 2008 9:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yeah, i stand by adding U to this deck, the counters just give the deck that extra push against control. But if you dont feel it necessary, then for big bad control decks like QnT you need creatures that put a little more beatdown on the opponent without giving them those tasty 2 for 1 opportunities. I would suggest adding Wilt-Leaf Cavaliers. This guy on turn 3 behind some discard is a beating. Also, he is phenomenal at putting the brakes on the aggro decks because he is so big.

I've also become a huge fan of kitchen finks in testing the BW ac decks. He is such a card advantage speed bump for the opponent. Against aggro it is multiple cards and life, and against the control player he is a 3 power guy and so is not irrevelent to the beatdown situation, and he like in the aggro matchups puts a wrench in the gears of their card advantage machine.

In the board, i would say that WoG is a little unnecessary and counter-intuitive. So i would suggest adding nameless inversion to the board, which can be boarded in for aggro matchups to cheapen your removal spells and make them all instant speed.

Also, if you did decide to add U nameless would be a MD for changeling purposes.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Magic-League.com Forum Index -> Standard (T2) Decks All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group

All content on this page may not be reproduced without consent of Magic-League Directors.
Magic the Gathering is TM and copyright Wizards of the Coast, Inc, a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc. All rights reserved.


About Us | Contact Us | Privacy Policy