|
|
| Is this a viable deck for regionals? |
| Yes its gonna pwn |
|
8% |
[ 1 ] |
| With a few changes it will pwn |
|
25% |
[ 3 ] |
| i pwned your mom last night |
|
58% |
[ 7 ] |
| the only thing it pwns would be a 59 card deck |
|
8% |
[ 1 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 12 |
|
| Author |
Message |
Tird_Ape
Joined: 09 Dec 2006 Posts: 105
|
Posted: Sat May 31, 2008 3:36 am Post subject: RG Warriors |
|
|
So basically i am trying to make a cheap deck for regionals that does not involve any very high money cards and this is what i came up with
/ Deck file for Magic Workstation (http://www.magicworkstation.com)
// Lands 21
4 [10E] Treetop Village
4 [RAV] Forest (3)
4 [TSP] Mountain (4)
4 [6E] Karplusan Forest
2 [SHM] Reflecting Pool
2 [SHM] Fire-Lit Thicket
1 [TSB] Pendelhaven
// Creatures 26
4 [SHM] Tattermunge Maniac
4 [4E] Llanowar Elves
4 [MOR] Bramblewood Paragon
3 [LOR] Wren's Run Vanquisher
2 [MOR] Chameleon Colossus
2 [SHM] Boggart Ram-Gang
3 [SHM] Wilt-Leaf Cavaliers
2 [MR] Troll Ascetic
2 [LRW] Imperious Perfect
// Spells 13
2 [TSP] Rift Bolt
4 [SHM] Flame Javelin
3 [5E] Incinerate
2 [MOR] Obsidian Battle-Axe
2 [SHM] Shield of the Oversoul
// Sideboard 15
SB: 1 [MR] Troll Ascetic
SB: 2 [SHM] Firespout
SB: 3 [SHM] Kitchen Finks
SB: 2 [SHM] Everlasting Torment
SB: 2 [SHM] Safehold Elite
SB: 2 [TSP] Krosan Grip
SB: 3 [PLC] Utopia Vow
any help or suggestions with reasoning would be helpful, not doing
TARMOGOYF etc would be appreciated |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lynolf
Joined: 25 Aug 2007 Posts: 255
|
Posted: Sat May 31, 2008 4:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
-3 Wilt-Leaf Cavaliers
-2 Troll Ascetic
-2 Shield of the Oversoul
+2 Boggart Ram-Gang
+2 Giantbaiting
I would add more elves on the other 3 slots to get the boost from Imperious Perfect or to reveal for Wren's Run Vanquisher. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tird_Ape
Joined: 09 Dec 2006 Posts: 105
|
Posted: Sat May 31, 2008 4:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
PostPosted: 31 May 2008 11:21 Post subject:
-3 Wilt-Leaf Cavaliers
-2 Troll Ascetic
-2 Shield of the Oversoul
+2 Boggart Ram-Gang
+2 Giantbaiting
I would add more elves on the other 3 slots to get the boost from Imperious Perfect or to reveal for Wren's Run Vanquisher. |
So your telling me to take out some of the best elves in my deck to run more elves? Shield of the oversoul is one of the best antiwrath cards which hurts my deck and on wilt leaf, troll or even ram gang the card is the nuts. i testing giantbaiting but im still not sure if it is good or bad. optimally its 10 dmg trample but normally its 4 that gets blocked by a forge tender or a wall of roots etc. ramg gang is a very good card but i do not think cutting troll for it would be the best choice. Troll ascetic shuts down decks that only have targeted removal which is the majority in the meta. wilt-leaf is the new burning tree shaman card in my opinion (3/4 for 3) and the vigilance also helps also in the aggro mirrior match. What decks would giant baiting be good against? and also what other cards would be possible cuts? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Vedrfolner
Joined: 04 Apr 2006 Posts: 1396
|
Posted: Sat May 31, 2008 6:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
I would take out the Rift Bolts for 1 more Incinerate and 1 more Vanquisher. I think you have too few 2-drops in the deck. Only 7, and when you run only 4 manaelves, boosting to 3 mana turn 2 is not likely enough. The result may be too many draws where you have no creatures before turn 3.
If you move the Colossuses to the sideboard replacing Safehold Elite, you could run Radha or Gaddock Teeg... well, actually Safehold Elite is a quite good 2-drop as well.
You could actually cut the whole Warrior theme and have 6 slots free for more of better cards like Imperious Perfect, Troll Ascetic and Ram-Gang. Or more burn. Paragon-Axe haven't proved worth the dedication so far. Starting to drop threats turn 4 (or 3 at best) if you are lucky enough to get such a start ensures that you are far behind on damage dealing - and just actually dropping threats instead has proven more efficient. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ManaLeak
Joined: 08 Nov 2005 Posts: 131
|
Posted: Sat May 31, 2008 6:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
| shusher... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tird_Ape
Joined: 09 Dec 2006 Posts: 105
|
Posted: Sat May 31, 2008 7:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | not doing
TARMOGOYF etc would be appreciated |
What dont you understand?
and shusher isnt even taht good i do not know what peopel see in that card. It just says all your spell need you to leave 1 open which hurts alot of aggro decks. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gypsy
Joined: 15 Jun 2007 Posts: 903
|
Posted: Sat May 31, 2008 7:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
| how do u rate shusher on the same scale as goyf |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ILikeBananas
Joined: 01 Aug 2006 Posts: 155
|
Posted: Sat May 31, 2008 12:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| The poll result so far shows you how mature some people at ML are. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tird_Ape
Joined: 09 Dec 2006 Posts: 105
|
Posted: Sat May 31, 2008 2:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| gypsy wrote: | | how do u rate shusher on the same scale as goyf |
where did i say that? i just said not just to list card names |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JarheadL337
Joined: 16 Feb 2007 Posts: 31
|
Posted: Sat May 31, 2008 2:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Vedrfolner wrote: |
You could actually cut the whole Warrior theme and have 6 slots free for more of better cards like Imperious Perfect, Troll Ascetic and Ram-Gang. Or more burn. Paragon-Axe haven't proved worth the dedication so far. Starting to drop threats turn 4 (or 3 at best) if you are lucky enough to get such a start ensures that you are far behind on damage dealing - and just actually dropping threats instead has proven more efficient. |
actually I would suggest cutting the elves theme and making it strictly warrior... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|