|
|
| Author |
Message |
Hippie89
Joined: 20 Jul 2008 Posts: 8
|
Posted: Sun Jul 20, 2008 5:20 pm Post subject: B/W Aggro (needs sideboard help) |
|
|
With Eventides release i've decided to get back into T2 play with A B/W deck...playtested it a few times on MWS and it didnt seem to flow right. Any help would be appreciated, thanks in advance.
Creature
4x Nip Gwyllion
4x Nightsky Mimic
4x Stillmoon Cavalier
4x Deathbringer Liege
3x Divinity of Pride
Enchantments
4x Edge of the Divinity
Sorceries
4x Thoughtseize
2x Profane Command
Instants
4x Unmake
4x Nameless Inversion
Lands
13x Swamp
5x Plains
4x Fetid Heath
1x Urborg, tomb of yawgmoth
Sideboard
4x Oblivion Ring
3x Extirpate
2x Wrath of God
2x Damnation
4x Necrotic Sliver
Last edited by Hippie89 on Sun Jul 27, 2008 12:18 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ransom3
Joined: 01 Oct 2007 Posts: 165
|
Posted: Sun Jul 20, 2008 5:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| There is no reason for you to run any Plains in this deck. If you run all Swamps, you could consider Tendrils of Agony as a removal option...it's not great but it could be useful at least against aggro decks. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Daffie999
Joined: 08 Jun 2008 Posts: 13
|
Posted: Sun Jul 20, 2008 6:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ransom3 wrote: | | There is no reason for you to run any Plains in this deck. If you run all Swamps, you could consider Tendrils of Agony as a removal option...it's not great but it could be useful at least against aggro decks. | Tendrils of Corruption |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hippie89
Joined: 20 Jul 2008 Posts: 8
|
Posted: Sun Jul 20, 2008 6:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hmmm, dont really need tendrills for more removal, unmake and nameless seem to be enough
didnt notice the swamps only thing though, my first version had that if BW was spent to play it and a few white cards |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ransom3
Joined: 01 Oct 2007 Posts: 165
|
Posted: Sun Jul 20, 2008 8:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Tendrils of Corruption, right, thanks for the correction. I like the tempo you have for your creatures in this deck |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hippie89
Joined: 20 Jul 2008 Posts: 8
|
Posted: Sun Jul 20, 2008 10:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| after a bit of playtesting this seems pretty smoothed out, profane command could be dropped for something else perhaps....and all the plains are out...corrupt maybe? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Vedrfolner
Joined: 04 Apr 2006 Posts: 1399
|
Posted: Mon Jul 21, 2008 3:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
I would definitely play 4 Lieges in there; it seems like one of the main reasons to play all those twin-coloured cards. Otherwise you could as well play Withered Wretch, Dauthi Slayer and friends. The other main reason is the +3/+3 for B you get with Edge of Divinity.
I am not sold on 4 Profane Commands. You have no cip effect on any of your creatures. I would rather have Thoughtseize in that slot. You could always take out the Voracious Hatchlings as well, at 4 mana you got Korlash, Ashling and lots of other way way better creatures to choose from in black.
I wouldn't necessarily go the mono-black route, though. The fact is that plains don't hurt you. (I would play 4 hybrid, 4-5 plains) and get access to Oblivion Ring and Disenchant, among other cards.
-2 Profane Command
-3 Voracious Hatchling
+1 Deathbringer Liege
+4 Thoughtseize
-5 Plains
+1 Urborg, Tomb of Yawgmoth
+4 Fetid Heath |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Psyckorid
Joined: 16 Feb 2006 Posts: 11
|
Posted: Fri Jul 25, 2008 2:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
Not enough creatures!
Loxodon warhammer seems to be a nice fit, double life link is amazing.
-1 deathbringer liege (two in play is redundant
-1 divinity of pride
-4 nameless inversion (unmake is enough, plus liege)
+2 loxodon warhammer (makes nip a house)
+4 korlash (all swamp?) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hippie89
Joined: 20 Jul 2008 Posts: 8
|
Posted: Sat Jul 26, 2008 1:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
| This deck usually plays pretty fast and ends games by turn 5-6, i dont think warhammer is all that neccesary and i definately dont like korlash in this deck(love the card in general, just doesnt really fit with this deck) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|