|
|
| Author |
Message |
PanteraRox
Joined: 11 Jul 2005
Posts: 17
|
 Posted: Sun Jul 23, 2006 7:13 am Post subject: Serious T1 deck from me (finally) |
 |
|
I made a rack deck, and this is much more competitive than my last efforts. Please gimme some help.
-=Creatures=-
2 Mindslicer
2 Hollow Spectre
4 Ravenous Rats
-=Artifacts=-
4 The Rack
3 Anvil of Bogarden
1 Mox Jet
1 Black Lotus
-=Enchantments=-
4 Megrim
2 Underworld Dreams
2 Bottomless Pit
1 Necropotence
2 Phyrexian Arena
-=Sorcery=-
1 Demonic Tutor
1 Yawgmoth's Will
1 Mind Twist
4 Blackmail
2 Duress
4 Hymn to Tourach
-=Instant=-
4 Dark Ritual
4 Funeral Charm
-=Land=-
10 Swamp
1 Strip Mine
I know lands are kinda short, but I can do a lot with Mox Jet, Black Lotus, and Dark Ritual in there. This is obviously an Apprentice deck, 'cause I don't collect the cards. The point is to make them discard and not have any cards and make it hurt whenever they do discard. Ta da. Tell me what you think. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Haro
Joined: 01 Sep 2004
Posts: 249
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 23, 2006 7:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | 4 Blackmail
2 Duress
0 Hypies
0 Negator
0 Wasteland |
That says it all. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Orgasmatron
Joined: 26 Jun 2006
Posts: 29
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 23, 2006 7:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I'd lock this if I could, because apparently nobody ever follows the rules here anymore. Any mono black deck in Legacy sucks the bucket, in Vintage you're just multiplying that rule by three. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
PanteraRox
Joined: 11 Jul 2005
Posts: 17
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 23, 2006 8:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Well, I guess I'm breaking the rules then, because this deck has a winning record. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kikimikejiki
Joined: 26 Dec 2004
Posts: 649
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 23, 2006 8:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
| LIES i want me 30 seconds back |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Red-
Joined: 21 Apr 2005
Posts: 59
Location: Estonia
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 23, 2006 9:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Satyricon wrote: | | I'd lock this if I could, because apparently nobody ever follows the rules here anymore. Any mono black deck in Legacy sucks the bucket, in Vintage you're just multiplying that rule by three. |
Wow guy you're way off about mono black in Vintage. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
VacancyMan
Joined: 01 May 2005
Posts: 308
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 23, 2006 10:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
| _Estel_ wrote: | | Satyricon wrote: | | I'd lock this if I could, because apparently nobody ever follows the rules here anymore. Any mono black deck in Legacy sucks the bucket, in Vintage you're just multiplying that rule by three. |
Wow guy you're way off about mono black in Vintage. |
And Legacy, too! xD |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Orgasmatron
Joined: 26 Jun 2006
Posts: 29
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 23, 2006 11:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
| No I'm not, just ask GRAH or Niknight. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Malhavoc
Joined: 21 Sep 2004
Posts: 156
Location: Italy
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 23, 2006 11:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
With the printing of Confidant, I've seen some Mono black (with a red spash for some rebs) doing decent results in tournaments. They are far from being strong decks, but they are somehow playable. Differently from the above card pile, of course  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jedidawn
Joined: 16 Dec 2005
Posts: 35
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 23, 2006 1:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Satyricon wrote: | | No I'm not, just ask GRAH or Niknight. |
You are COMPLETELY wr5ong in legacy. Train Wreck is a teir one deck with several tournament top-1s (different fromtop-8s incase you can't tell) under it's belt out of what? 6/7 legacy tournaments? Learn about a format before you speak of it. Oh and a little birdie told me me that Tendrils was a good deck in vintage |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
daman4udog
Joined: 28 Jul 2005
Posts: 43
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 23, 2006 2:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| and ravenous rats in type 1? hahahaha |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Orgasmatron
Joined: 26 Jun 2006
Posts: 29
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 23, 2006 4:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I wouldn't consider train wreck tier 1 at all. And why even bother to play Nausea/Tendrils varient over Iggy-Pop anyways? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
NahHolmes
Joined: 13 Jan 2005
Posts: 598
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 28, 2006 5:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| PanteraRox wrote: | | Well, I guess I'm breaking the rules then, because this deck has a winning record. |
| Quote: | | PanteraRox doesn't have a match history in the category Eternal. |
You beating people in casual play on M-L that can't even goldfish the deck they either Threw together or Netdecked because they only play T2 does not equal a winning record. This deck is god aweful. Why the hell run 4 Blackmails and 2 Duresses? I wouldn't say all monoblack is garbage but it's not teir 1 (and that includes Legacy, sorry Train Wreck is NOT teir one I'm pretty sure it's creator would even agree as he invented a new deck for day 2 rather then play Train Wreck again at the Duel for Duals). |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
IanRobbins
Joined: 02 Dec 2004
Posts: 233
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 29, 2006 12:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
You are COMPLETELY wr5ong in legacy. Train Wreck is a teir one deck with several tournament top-1s (different fromtop-8s incase you can't tell) under it's belt out of what? 6/7 legacy tournaments? Learn about a format before you speak of it. Oh and a little birdie told me me that Tendrils was a good deck in vintage |
Just to let you know, you have no idea what you are talking about.
t1 = Goblins/Thresh
t1.5 = Solidarity
Although solidarity is on the rise, so you can switch threshold and solidarity around.
Other random decks are iggypop, rifter, stax, stomy (both kinds), and zoo, train wreak goes in this catagory. Burn is around, but not much anymore. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Orgasmatron
Joined: 26 Jun 2006
Posts: 29
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 31, 2006 2:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| IanRobbins just made my hero list back there, he couldn't be more right about what he just said. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
