|
|
| Author |
Message |
buda
Joined: 18 Jun 2005 Posts: 46
|
Posted: Mon May 08, 2006 5:38 pm Post subject: UW aggro control |
|
|
The Deck
7 Plains
4 Adarkar Wastes
4 Hallowed Fountain
4 Island
1 Oboro, Palace in the Clouds
1 Minamo, School at Water's E
1 Eiganjo Castle
1 Azorius Chancery
2 Shining Shoal
3 Condemn
3 Mana Leak
3 Faith's Fetters
4 Remand
4 Ninja of the Deep Hours
4 Savannah Lions
3 Isamaru, Hound of Konda
3 Azorius First-Wing
3 Azorius Guildmage
3 Kira, Great Glass-Spinner
3 Paladin en-Vec
Sideboard
1 Shining Shoal
2 Eight-and-a-Half-Tails
3 Umezawa's Jitte
3 Hokori, Dust Drinker
3 Sacred Ground
3 Bathe in Light
What you people think about it? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dr_Moo
Joined: 26 Nov 2004 Posts: 987
|
Posted: Mon May 08, 2006 6:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Your creatures are just worse than other aggro decks, and I don't think your tricks are good enough to bridge the gap. I am quite interested by u/w Tallowisp, and my suggestion would be to change to that. I can't think of an advantage to u/w; you have worse creatures, conditional (Condemn) or slow (Fetters) removal, and no burn. The sole advantage is countermagic and Ninja, which is inferior to Dark Confidant.
This may be better against control decks. That would need testing to determine. While you have counters, you're slower and have no Chars to win after the board is stable. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
synch987
Joined: 31 Mar 2006 Posts: 266
|
Posted: Tue May 09, 2006 12:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
what creatures exactly do you have a problem with? paladin? isamaru? ninja? i think all these creatures have proven themselves.
my only worry is that you wont get ninja out turn 2 that often, so i would drop a ninja and a fetters for 2 azorius herald. also this deck will run out of steam against anyone who can stop the ninja.
replace condemn with reciprocate, as in an aggro deck with no giant finishers (meloku), the life you may be forced to give them could lose games, and you have 16+ life gain in the deck.
i think the board is spot on, and overall its a very nice deck. unfortunately WW aggro is probably overall better than this
congrats on posting a deck that didnt suck as much ass as the other ones round here  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
buda
Joined: 18 Jun 2005 Posts: 46
|
Posted: Tue May 09, 2006 11:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
| thnx i'm working in the deck constantly to improve until its perfect for me! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dr_Moo
Joined: 26 Nov 2004 Posts: 987
|
Posted: Tue May 09, 2006 11:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
| It isn't that there are problems with your creatures, it's just that they aren't as good as the creatures in other decks (Kird Ape, Watchwolf, Scab-Clan Mauler, Dark Confidant, Nantuko Husk, Ghost Council, etc). You have to make up for this disparity somewhere, and I don't think countermagic is enough. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Visara
Joined: 17 Jan 2005 Posts: 55
|
Posted: Tue May 09, 2006 12:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Dr_Moo is exactly right. I agree 100%. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|