|
|
| Author |
Message |
squee2
Joined: 20 Jan 2006
Posts: 7
|
 Posted: Sat May 06, 2006 7:08 pm Post subject: Resurection of WU control |
 |
|
I've been testing WU control on MWS with this list and I think that there can be some improvement, I'd really appricaite feedback, thanks.
//NAME: WU controll
2 Azorius Chancery
6 Island
1 Eiganjo Castle
4 Plains
1 Minamo, School at Water's Edge
4 Adarkar Wastes
4 Hallowed Fountain
1 Mikokoro, Center of the Sea
1 Oboro, Palace in the Clouds
2 Windreaver
2 Meloku the Clouded Mirror
4 Repeal
4 Rewind
4 Compulsive Research
4 Remand
4 Hinder
4 Mana Leak
4 Wrath of God
4 Condemn
// Sideboard:
SB: 2 Grand Arbiter Augustin IV
SB: 2 Spell Snare
SB: 3 Confiscate
SB: 3 Threads of Disloyalty
SB: 3 Sacred Ground
SB: 2 Faith's Fetters |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ShaunD
Joined: 21 May 2005
Posts: 50
|
| Posted: Sat May 06, 2006 7:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| You shouldnt play the BLue or the White Legendary Land, this last thing a control deck needs is to get wastelanded. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Alandariel
Joined: 17 Jan 2006
Posts: 136
|
| Posted: Sat May 06, 2006 7:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Don't talk please.
Castle stops Char on Meloku, Minamo untaps him to block, Oboro helps against Wildfire, LD, Wasteland, etc. and Mikokoro is awesome in this deck.
The only problem I see is the sideboard. I'd run Ivory Mask over GAAIV and Spell Snare as it all but stops Heartbeat, burn, discard, etc. I'd go with Paladin en-Vec over Sacred Ground as well because Sacred Ground keeps you from losing to Vore, but Paladin just pretty much wins against it. Plus you want to counter their Wildfire anyway. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
VacancyMan
Joined: 01 May 2005
Posts: 314
|
| Posted: Sat May 06, 2006 8:55 pm Post subject: o_O |
|
|
Wasteland? I'm extremely confused. This is a T2 deck right?
In any case, please don't shamelessly copy Magic-League articles without referencing them. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Fools
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 105
|
| Posted: Sat May 06, 2006 9:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| it isn't the exact same list |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
synch987
Joined: 31 Mar 2006
Posts: 266
|
| Posted: Sun May 07, 2006 1:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
| this post is pointless, you took the list from the article and made it worse |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
rods
Joined: 25 Mar 2006
Posts: 24
|
| Posted: Sun May 07, 2006 2:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
| mass counters and mass removals, looks really fun!!!!111ELEVEN |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
squee2
Joined: 20 Jan 2006
Posts: 7
|
| Posted: Sun May 07, 2006 9:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Synch- wrote: | | this post is pointless, you took the list from the article and made it worse |
You wanna explain your reasoning behind that? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Shagrath
Joined: 24 Feb 2005
Posts: 202
|
| Posted: Sun May 07, 2006 9:48 am Post subject: .... |
|
|
telling time is better than compulsive research in uw control.
Why arbitrer in sb?... that just doesn´t fit in this type of deck..... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Apos
Joined: 24 May 2005
Posts: 740
|
| Posted: Sun May 07, 2006 10:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
| telling time sux ^^ top is better anyday |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
synch987
Joined: 31 Mar 2006
Posts: 266
|
| Posted: Sun May 07, 2006 12:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
without any shuffle effects top is not better than telling time, towards the late game you will have a load of cards you dont want on top of your library, and telling time can be done if you dont counter anything in their turn, but you are limiting your counter mana with compulsive research.
some quickens might be an idea if you have compulsive research though, eot WoG is da bomb!
read the article, jushi is the centre of the deck |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
rods
Joined: 25 Mar 2006
Posts: 24
|
| Posted: Sun May 07, 2006 2:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| telling time is good. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ant900
Joined: 11 Oct 2004
Posts: 2449
Location: somewhere
|
| Posted: Sun May 07, 2006 6:10 pm Post subject: Re: o_O |
|
|
| VacancyMan wrote: | Wasteland? I'm extremely confused. This is a T2 deck right?
|
that whole post just flew right over your head and you only caught wasteland... try rereading the posts |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kikimikejiki
Joined: 26 Dec 2004
Posts: 664
|
| Posted: Sun May 07, 2006 7:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ok all of these uw decks suck just liek gruul before heezy made it good |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
bb_bart
Joined: 22 Jan 2006
Posts: 82
|
| Posted: Sun May 07, 2006 8:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| kikimikejiki wrote: | | ok all of these uw decks suck just liek gruul before heezy made it good |
actually gruul was good pre heezy, and heezy didnt make a good deck, he exploited a bad meta |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
