Magic-League.com Forum Index Magic-League.com
Forums of Magic-League: Free Online tcg playing; casual or tournament play.
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Disgusting Tech - - Dark Naya



 
Reply to topic    Magic-League.com Forum Index -> Standard (T2) Decks
Author Message
JacobMatthew



Joined: 16 Dec 2009
Posts: 131

PostPosted: Tue May 25, 2010 11:35 pm    Post subject: Disgusting Tech - - Dark Naya Reply with quote

// Lands
4 [ZEN] Verdant Catacombs
2 [ZEN] Marsh Flats
4 [H09] Ancient Ziggurat
3 [ZEN] Arid Mesa
2 [7E] Swamp (3)
2 [PT] Mountain (3)
2 [US] Plains (3)
4 [5E] Forest (2)
1 [WWK] Raging Ravine

// Creatures
4 [ROE] Vengevine
4 [ARB] Bloodbraid Elf
4 [ZEN] Lotus Cobra
3 [GTW] Sprouting Thrinax
3 [ARB] Putrid Leech
4 [CFX] Knight of the Reliquary
4 [4E] Birds of Paradise
1 [WWK] Stoneforge Mystic
2 [M10] Baneslayer Angel
1 [ARB] Dauntless Escort

// Spells
1 [ALA] Oblivion Ring
2 [ARB] Maelstrom Pulse
1 [ARB] Behemoth Sledge
1 [WWK] Basilisk Collar
1 [DDD] Garruk Wildspeaker

// Sideboard
SB: 2 [M10] Baneslayer Angel
SB: 3 [ARB] Dauntless Escort
SB: 1 [WWK] Basilisk Collar
SB: 3 [10E] Pithing Needle
SB: 4 [WWK] Cunning Sparkmage
SB: 2 [ZEN] Living Tsunami

last 4 people I played asked for my decklist, so here it is.
ive won the only 2 minis i've played in it with this tech
been sitting on it for about a week.
the splash for black gives you two of the best 2 and 3 drop creatures in the format: putrid leech and sprouting thrinax (and one of the best removal spells in the format, maelstrom pulse). the mana curve vs. quality of creatures in this deck is fucking amazing.

the original idea came from basically trying to cram all the best creatures in the format into a crazy zoo deck with ziggurats birds (originally ran 5c with blue for rhox war monk and sedraxis specter) , and ridiculous cobra kotr synergy, but once vengevine came out it really became competitive.

by running this version you lose your ranger of eos and wild nacatl and skewt mob, and your 4 maindeck cunning sparkmage, and run much higher quality 2cc and 3cc creatures with more ramp via lotus cobras and accessibility to maelstrom pulse

i'd say 66% of games i play i go t1 birds, t2 cobra drop pop fetch, drop thrinax or kotr. if kotr meets no removal, dump my hand next turn. it's ridiculous. players scooping on turn 4 for 25 % of my games if i dump my hand. i am not undefeated with it i've gone to like 30 cards left in deck against jund, but against control i just don't run out of steam, and after sideboard pithing needls and 4x dauntless .. idk. 1-1 with mythic conscription, the only deck i havent had extensive testing against.


It's really sick to play with. Build it and try it.
Back to top
FiReBLT



Joined: 31 Dec 2004
Posts: 297

PostPosted: Wed May 26, 2010 1:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Played a few games with it, seems strong, but Spreading Seas + Tectonic Edge would be an issue with this deck.
Back to top
SJM



Joined: 17 Apr 2009
Posts: 415

PostPosted: Wed May 26, 2010 4:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Regular cobra/vengevine naya with ranger of eos and noble hierarch seems superior in every way to this deck.
Back to top
Kurtgrunge



Joined: 06 Sep 2007
Posts: 30

PostPosted: Wed May 26, 2010 6:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Maelstrom pulse is quite terrible in this deck,most of the creature you play are played in jund and bant and obv the mirror so it's a dead card except against planeswalker or some random artifacts/enchantment
Back to top
Obnoxide



Joined: 06 Mar 2010
Posts: 33

PostPosted: Wed May 26, 2010 9:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

FiReBLT wrote:
Played a few games with it, seems strong, but Spreading Seas + Tectonic Edge would be an issue with this deck.


not exactly, Tectonic Edge might be a problem, however Seas would be easily delt with by a Tsunami.
Back to top
Vedrfolner



Joined: 04 Apr 2006
Posts: 2325

PostPosted: Wed May 26, 2010 10:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Obnoxide wrote:
FiReBLT wrote:
Played a few games with it, seems strong, but Spreading Seas + Tectonic Edge would be an issue with this deck.


not exactly, Tectonic Edge might be a problem, however Seas would be easily delt with by a Tsunami.


Wouldn't Deprive be a better way to fix that problem?
Back to top
JacobMatthew



Joined: 16 Dec 2009
Posts: 131

PostPosted: Wed May 26, 2010 10:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Vedrfolner wrote:
Obnoxide wrote:
FiReBLT wrote:
Played a few games with it, seems strong, but Spreading Seas + Tectonic Edge would be an issue with this deck.


not exactly, Tectonic Edge might be a problem, however Seas would be easily delt with by a Tsunami.


Wouldn't Deprive be a better way to fix that problem?


deprive would be awesome sb tech against uw luls
Back to top
JacobMatthew



Joined: 16 Dec 2009
Posts: 131

PostPosted: Wed May 26, 2010 10:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kurtgrunge wrote:
Maelstrom pulse is quite terrible in this deck,most of the creature you play are played in jund and bant and obv the mirror so it's a dead card except against planeswalker or some random artifacts/enchantment


see i thought the same thing, since im running the same shit as everyone else,
but it's only been a dead card a couple times, and that was off bloodbraid
i've been getting good card advantage i mean against aggro lists that i have little to no removal they are gonna just drop mad shit
and its huge taking out 2 nacatls or 2 goblin guides on turn 3
good removal im leaving it in until it fucks me which it hasnt
Back to top
JacobMatthew



Joined: 16 Dec 2009
Posts: 131

PostPosted: Wed May 26, 2010 10:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

JacobMatthew wrote:
Vedrfolner wrote:
Obnoxide wrote:
FiReBLT wrote:
Played a few games with it, seems strong, but Spreading Seas + Tectonic Edge would be an issue with this deck.


not exactly, Tectonic Edge might be a problem, however Seas would be easily delt with by a Tsunami.


Wouldn't Deprive be a better way to fix that problem?


deprive would be awesome sb tech against uw luls


but tsunami is better because ... he's a 4/4 flyer for 4 . . and synergy with lotus cobra . .
Back to top
Vedrfolner



Joined: 04 Apr 2006
Posts: 2325

PostPosted: Wed May 26, 2010 11:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

JacobMatthew wrote:
JacobMatthew wrote:
Vedrfolner wrote:
Obnoxide wrote:
FiReBLT wrote:
Played a few games with it, seems strong, but Spreading Seas + Tectonic Edge would be an issue with this deck.


not exactly, Tectonic Edge might be a problem, however Seas would be easily delt with by a Tsunami.


Wouldn't Deprive be a better way to fix that problem?


deprive would be awesome sb tech against uw luls


but tsunami is better because ... he's a 4/4 flyer for 4 . . and synergy with lotus cobra . .


And without cobra (and even with him) the Tsunami's drawback will break your neck... eventually.
Back to top
JacobMatthew



Joined: 16 Dec 2009
Posts: 131

PostPosted: Wed May 26, 2010 2:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

naw i can sit at 5 lands im usually playing off the top of my deck .
Back to top
gypsy



Joined: 15 Jun 2007
Posts: 1671

PostPosted: Wed May 26, 2010 3:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Vedrfolner wrote:
Obnoxide wrote:
FiReBLT wrote:
Played a few games with it, seems strong, but Spreading Seas + Tectonic Edge would be an issue with this deck.


not exactly, Tectonic Edge might be a problem, however Seas would be easily delt with by a Tsunami.


Wouldn't Deprive be a better way to fix that problem?


Bloodbraid elf has a little problem in the same deck as deprive
Back to top
InWaking



Joined: 30 Jun 2009
Posts: 137

PostPosted: Thu May 27, 2010 5:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

might have a hard time casting bbelf if your lands are spreaded wide so deprive may not be all that horrible of an idea.. (i actually think it is a bad idea but i don't judge)

one garruck seems really random, any reason why?
Back to top
SJM



Joined: 17 Apr 2009
Posts: 415

PostPosted: Fri May 28, 2010 2:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

xSNACKSx wrote:
SJM wrote:
Regular cobra/vengevine naya with ranger of eos and noble hierarch seems superior in every way to this deck.
girl


LOLWUT
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Magic-League.com Forum Index -> Standard (T2) Decks All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group

All content on this page may not be reproduced without consent of Magic-League Directors.
Magic the Gathering is TM and copyright Wizards of the Coast, Inc, a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc. All rights reserved.


About Us | Contact Us | Privacy Policy