|
|
| Author |
Message |
standarizeMA
Joined: 09 Mar 2008
Posts: 176
|
 Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2008 5:13 pm Post subject: GRB Big Mana. Critique please. |
 |
|
Okay so this deck sticks out to me for a couple of reasons and it seems good against most tier decks.
Critique and suggestions are welcome. Enjoy!
// Deck file for Magic Workstation (http://www.magicworkstation.com)
// Lands
3 [10E] Treetop Village
3 [ALA] Savage Lands
3 [SHM] Fire-Lit Thicket
2 [EVE] Twilight Mire
2 [10E] Sulfurous Springs
1 [FUT] Graven Cairns
4 [TSP] Forest (1)
3 [BD] Mountain (2)
3 [7E] Swamp (3)
// Creatures
3 [ALA] Broodmate Dragon
2 [LRW] Shriekmaw
4 [ALA] Sprouting Thrinax
3 [MOR] Chameleon Colossus
3 [LRW] Garruk Wildspeaker
// Spells
4 [10E] Rampant Growth
4 [LRW] Fertile Ground
3 [ALA] Violent Ultimatum
1 [10E] Loxodon Warhammer
4 [ALA] Resounding Thunder
3 [SHM] Firespout
2 [ALA] Jund Charm
// Sideboard
SB: 1 [SHM] Firespout
SB: 2 [ALA] Jund Charm
SB: 3 [ALA] Infest
SB: 3 [MOR] Mind Shatter
SB: 3 [SHM] Kitchen Finks
SB: 2 [LRW] Primal Command
SB: 1 [EVE] Wickerbough Elder |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Triggers
Joined: 08 Sep 2008
Posts: 110
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2008 5:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I dont think resounding thunder is very good, 3 damage for 3
and 6 damage for 8..
Incinerate might be better here if your looking for spot removal, i would also cut down to 2 ultimatums
Looks pretty decent i guess, Why not BoP tho, maybe change mana base a little bit to pain lands. Nothing else to do turn 1  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Joker619
Joined: 23 Sep 2008
Posts: 13
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2008 5:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
resoundering thunder is bad UNLESS it is being cycled
6 damage, a card and uncounterable= countrol loses |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
standarizeMA
Joined: 09 Mar 2008
Posts: 176
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2008 5:46 pm Post subject: ya |
|
|
| Well resounding thunder > incienrate in this deck because cycling ftw is good as well as drawing the card. Paying 1 more to deal 3 is fine. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
letsbetigers
Joined: 10 Aug 2008
Posts: 1
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2008 8:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I think cloudthresher belongs somewhere in this deck. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ILikeBananas
Joined: 01 Aug 2006
Posts: 181
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 5:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Move resounding thunder to sb. You need some maindeck Cloudthresher. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TheBends
Joined: 25 Jul 2007
Posts: 15
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 7:21 am Post subject: re |
|
|
| Cloudthresher needs to be in there... And so does primal command. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Vedrfolner
Joined: 04 Apr 2006
Posts: 1931
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 7:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
| And Thoughtseize and Bitterblossom. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Kev
Joined: 31 Aug 2004
Posts: 95
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 8:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
| i would prolly cut 1 shriekmaw, 1 broodmate, 1 thunder, 1 ultimatum for 1 primal command and 3 cloudtresher. It gives you an actual chance against fearies. I also firmly believe siege-gang should be in that list somewhere. I do not know where though. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
standarizeMA
Joined: 09 Mar 2008
Posts: 176
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 8:59 am Post subject: .. |
|
|
| I dont know why everything thinks faerie match up is so hard. Colossus firespout and jund charm are all pretty damn good. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Kev
Joined: 31 Aug 2004
Posts: 95
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 9:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
| The deck autoloses to upkeep mistbind clique |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
standarizeMA
Joined: 09 Mar 2008
Posts: 176
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 9:56 am Post subject: ? |
|
|
doesnt auto lose..
ur ahead by thatpoint lol |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gdhack
Joined: 12 Aug 2008
Posts: 85
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 12:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
heres my variant on the deck ur wins are anything aggro ur hard mu's are qnt and fae
// Deck file for Magic Workstation (http://www.magicworkstation.com)
// NAME: Untitled Deck
// Lands
3 [LRW] Vivid Grove
2 [SHM] Reflecting Pool
3 [ALA] Plains (1)
4 [ALA] Forest (1)
4 [ALA] Mountain (1)
4 [ALA] Jungle Shrine
2 [7E] Swamp (3)
1 [TSP] Forest (1)
// Creatures
4 [LRW] Garruk Wildspeaker
4 [10E] Llanowar Elves
4 [ALA] Broodmate Dragon
4 [SHM] Farhaven Elf
3 [ALA] Sarkhan Vol
// Spells
3 [SHM] Firespout
4 [10E] Wrath of God
2 [LRW] Primal Command
2 [ALA] Naya Charm
3 [ALA] Violent Ultimatum
4 [LRW] Fertile Ground
// Sideboard
SB: 1 [LRW] Primal Command
SB: 2 [ALA] Naya Charm
SB: 2 [LRW] Cloudthresher
SB: 3 [EVE] Wickerbough Elder
SB: 3 [10E] Loxodon Warhammer
SB: 4 [SHM] Guttural Response
the sarkon vol can go idk why i have it in there i mean i have won alot of games with it but it could be sprouting thrinax or some other card but the thrinax comes to mind then next turn wrath or firespout idk this deck does have promise but fae qnt doran and bg elves are problems for the deck if u can get an ultimatum then its game but other wise ur going to have alot of hard times |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DESTRUCTOR
Joined: 28 Jun 2005
Posts: 117
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 2:28 pm Post subject: Re: GRB Big Mana. Critique please. |
|
|
| standarizeMA wrote: |
// Lands
3 [10E] Treetop Village
3 [ALA] Savage Lands
3 [SHM] Fire-Lit Thicket
2 [EVE] Twilight Mire
2 [10E] Sulfurous Springs
1 [FUT] Graven Cairns
4 [TSP] Forest (1)
3 [BD] Mountain (2)
3 [7E] Swamp (3)
// Creatures
3 [ALA] Broodmate Dragon
2 [LRW] Shriekmaw
4 [ALA] Sprouting Thrinax
3 [MOR] Chameleon Colossus
3 [LRW] Garruk Wildspeaker
// Spells
4 [10E] Rampant Growth
4 [LRW] Fertile Ground
3 [ALA] Violent Ultimatum
1 [10E] Loxodon Warhammer
4 [ALA] Resounding Thunder
3 [SHM] Firespout
2 [ALA] Jund Charm
// Sideboard
SB: 1 [SHM] Firespout
SB: 2 [ALA] Jund Charm
SB: 3 [ALA] Infest
SB: 3 [MOR] Mind Shatter
SB: 3 [SHM] Kitchen Finks
SB: 2 [LRW] Primal Command
SB: 1 [EVE] Wickerbough Elder |
1º you use pain lands when you should be using reflecting pool instead, 2º i agree with cutting the thunders and 1 ultimatum to add 3 clousthresher and 2 primal command, 3º i think hellkite overload is too good to leave out of this deck maybe 1-2 tops...maybe sharkhan vol is betther than garruk here i dont know and 4º we must try to find a way to use 2-4 kitchen finks on MD....Sprouting Thrinax still doesnt quite convince me but i havent tryed the deck so it may be pretty good i dont know....maybe in sb mind shatter and thougthsize's + fulminator mage to improve against faeries/QnT because i think you should beat aggro pretty much every time
Overoll i guess the deck has chances to be tier 1-2, last season it was a good choice until storm and lark became extremly popular and this meta doesnt have storm and lark loss a lot of it's power |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dr_Moo
Joined: 26 Nov 2004
Posts: 1011
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 7:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Anything less than 4 Treetop Village and 4 Resounding Thunder is insane. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
