|
|
| Author |
Message |
skilla420
Joined: 29 Apr 2008
Posts: 258
|
 Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 7:32 pm Post subject: Toys 'R Us |
 |
|
I know the name is stupid, but I kinda liked it. This is just a cool deck that I came up with that seemed to be different and yet fun. Haven't tried it yet but soon I will.
Toys 'R Us:
4 Shivan Reef
2 Scyring Sheets
4 Mouth of Ronom
8 Snow-Covered Island
5 Snow-Covered Mountain
2 Triskelavus
3 Stuffy Doll
3 Venser
2 Clockwork Hydra
1 Akroma Angel of Fury
3 Mulldrifter
4 Turn to Mist
4 Rune Snag
2 Cryptic Command
4 Coldsteel Heart
3 Mind Stone
4 Incinerate
2 Flame Javelin/ Beacon of Dectruction (leaning toward the javelin)
still working on the sideboard, but there it is. I was thinking about splashing white for momentary blink mainly, finks/riftwatcher, temporal isolation maybe, orings, nodes, pariah, whatever else will fit in.
Thoughts/suggestions welcome |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
shawn0003
Joined: 05 Sep 2004
Posts: 56
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 7:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| why not run some board sweep? like pyroclasm and blast. its good if you have mist or stuffy doll out. and most your crits can survive them. and stuffy throws the dmg at them |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
skilla420
Joined: 29 Apr 2008
Posts: 258
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 9:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Actually those were the only two cards I had on the sideboard originally. I think I'll keep them on there, and I'll have a sb up soon. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
shawn0003
Joined: 05 Sep 2004
Posts: 56
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 9:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ok i just playtested this a little bit
and a few questions
did you pick these creatures from out of your ass or something? most of them are bad. and mist doesnt even work that great with them. this deck runs so slow.
i made these changes before testing
-4 incinerate
-2 mind stone
-2 flame javelin
+4 sulfuric blast
+4 lash out
and well the deck just runs so slow. i feel like i dont even have that much of a threat coming at them. yea stuffy doll is cute. and also i just thought about this.
your running stuffy, your running a snow engine. why no skred?
-4 lash out
+4 skred
thats just a thought.
also i think this would just be better as a stuffy doll deck since thats what it looks like its trying to be. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
skilla420
Joined: 29 Apr 2008
Posts: 258
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 9:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| What does a stuffy doll deck look like? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
shawn0003
Joined: 05 Sep 2004
Posts: 56
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 9:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Here is one
creature [10]
3 Phyrexian Ironfoot
2 Spitebellows
1 Stalking Yeti
4 Stuffy Doll
instant [15]
3 Dead / Gone
4 Incinerate
4 Skred
4 Sulfurous Blast
sorcery [4]
2 Disintegrate
2 Molten Disaster
artifact [5]
4 Coldsteel Heart
1 Mind Stone
land [25]
1 Arena
2 Molten Slagheap
4 Mouth of Ronom
4 Scrying Sheets
13 Snow-Covered Mountain
1 Urza's Factory
planeswalker [2]
2 Chandra Nalaar
Here is one with white too
creature [4]
4 Stuffy Doll
instant [8]
4 Mana Tithe
4 Skred
sorcery [7]
3 Molten Disaster
4 Wrath of God
enchantment [11]
4 Oblivion Ring
3 Pariah
1 Sacred Mesa
3 Story Circle
artifact [6]
2 Coalition Relic
4 Coldsteel Heart
land [24]
1 Academy Ruins
2 Mouth of Ronom
4 Scrying Sheets
4 Snow-Covered Mountain
13 Snow-Covered Plains
those are two you can mess around with. the red one def looks better to me though |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
skilla420
Joined: 29 Apr 2008
Posts: 258
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 9:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I put in the turn to mist for:
1 akroma to change her from morph mode
2 to bring triskelavus back into play for 3 more tokens that can be sacked for burn
3 to replay vensers effect
4 to draw cards from mulldrifter
Not the best deck, I know. It just seemed fun and able to tweek.
But do tell about the stuffy doll deck... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
skilla420
Joined: 29 Apr 2008
Posts: 258
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 9:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sorry I posted before i saw the decks...
Yeah the red one is way better. What is the point of the ironfoot? I see him everywhere and I don't understand why he's in there. For scrying sheets? And what about the stalking yeti? Help me out... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
shawn0003
Joined: 05 Sep 2004
Posts: 56
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 9:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| yeti can repeatly hit your doll. ironfoot is a 3/4 for 3 that you can untap whenever...its just plain good +snow. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
skilla420
Joined: 29 Apr 2008
Posts: 258
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 9:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Yeti deals damage to an opponent's creature not your own doesn't it? It wouldn't work that way. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
shawn0003
Joined: 05 Sep 2004
Posts: 56
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 9:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| yea tru mybad. its just a way to get rid of crits i guess. only one in there thats why |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
skilless
Joined: 10 Apr 2006
Posts: 50
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 9:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| best deck name ever =X |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
skilla420
Joined: 29 Apr 2008
Posts: 258
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 10:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| i think we can find better substitutes for that. Maybe murderous redcap? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
skilla420
Joined: 29 Apr 2008
Posts: 258
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 10:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| maybe also toss in a couple shivan meteor. would be mad good with stuffy. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
NinjaCan
Joined: 28 May 2008
Posts: 54
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 10:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | creature [10]
3 Phyrexian Ironfoot
2 Spitebellows
1 Stalking Yeti
4 Stuffy Doll
instant [15]
3 Dead / Gone
4 Incinerate
4 Skred
4 Sulfurous Blast
sorcery [4]
2 Disintegrate
2 Molten Disaster
artifact [5]
4 Coldsteel Heart
1 Mind Stone
land [25]
1 Arena
2 Molten Slagheap
4 Mouth of Ronom
4 Scrying Sheets
13 Snow-Covered Mountain
1 Urza's Factory
planeswalker [2]
2 Chandra Nalaa |
I've played like this exact decklist almost right before shadowmoor came out. I would definately go 4 ironfoot vs stalking yeti, and i'd play 4 firespout now too. It's just too good to not play and let's not kid ourselves, this is not an aggro deck, it's a weird funny control deck.
It also loses terribly to a red deck that sideboards everlasting torment. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
