 |
Magic-League.com Forums of Magic-League: Free Online Magic: the Gathering Play with Apprentice and Magic Workstation; casual or tournament play.
|
|
|
| Which is the better Tog? |
| Classic Tog |
|
48% |
[ 22 ] |
| LFTL Tog |
|
51% |
[ 23 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 45 |
|
| Author |
Message |
XJapanSanctu
Joined: 31 Aug 2004 Posts: 4
|
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2005 4:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
All the versions have strenghts/weaknesses.
Scepter-tog is the best of the 5 builds (you forgot to mention just green with deeds without life enginge, but i guess that build maybe outdated due to life runs the same now anyway, and Billys tog/madness hybrid). I think, however, that many players (including me) have not tested and understood LoTL tog yet (yes, that means you, magic league noober you havent played it enough) and that's why nobody should actually answer this question. Come back in 2 months, then your answers are more valid.
Until then, my argument is:
UBr Scepter-tog is the best, along with Moreno's hybrid, but it's just that in the current meta it can't work (scepter, because with putrefy, deeds or hate vs affinity). However, in about 1 and a half, max 2 months I think this will die down soon, as affinity didnt prove itself at the PT and that the rock will lose popularity to also bad results. So the deck to play is SCEPTER-TOG.
This is why you always have to be one step ahead of everyone else; think one step beyond everyone else what the next meta will be etc.
Scepter tog has so many stronger strengths than UB that i dont even need to explain it. Faster, more explosive, better card quality (no situational force spikes), better sticks, same creatures but more choices, better card draw and more colors with the amazing fire/ice. The only weakness would be the hate+ inconsistency/manabase. But the strengths make up the weaknesses and when the meta changes, ScepterTog will be the one.
People were saying the same crap last year "bla bla, too much affinity (which was popular, since Canali had won the PT and every scrub and his mother were running the vial mage afinity deck, scepter-tog is never gonna be good bla bla" well i still sure did win my local ptq with just scepter-tog. People have THE FEAR, and THE FEAR is what makes you lose. It has everything Scepter-chant has, + better creatures, access to black for cranial ext, duress, better removal in smother, fire/ice etc.Scepter-tog is the deck. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Trotsky1
Joined: 12 Apr 2005 Posts: 744
|
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2005 5:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Both lists have proved there strength, to me this questionare almost comes down too a question of combo or control, as dredge atog can be viewed as more combo and straight up atog as more controlling. So yes either a meta or personal prefernce on play style. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TacoMaster
Joined: 27 Jul 2005 Posts: 16
|
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2005 6:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Parshath wrote: | | Plus Classic Tog can get to the lethal kill sometimes before you get your engine going. That's why Ruel 3-0'd Kenji =) |
No, he 3-0'd Kenji because Kenji only ran 1 LftL. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TacoMaster
Joined: 27 Jul 2005 Posts: 16
|
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2005 6:13 am Post subject: Re: To Parshath |
|
|
| ZodiacDragon wrote: | | To Parshath: YOU UPDATED RUEL'S DECK???? Cuz you are that much better than him right? You are a god damned idiot. |
He said that he updated to his liking. Please don't flame. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Y2Jonline
Joined: 08 Sep 2004 Posts: 92
|
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2005 9:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
| YakuzaXRock wrote: | All the versions have strenghts/weaknesses.
Scepter-tog is the best of the 5 builds (you forgot to mention just green with deeds without life enginge, but i guess that build maybe outdated due to life runs the same now anyway, and Billys tog/madness hybrid). I think, however, that many players (including me) have not tested and understood LoTL tog yet (yes, that means you, magic league noober you havent played it enough) and that's why nobody should actually answer this question. Come back in 2 months, then your answers are more valid.
Until then, my argument is:
UBr Scepter-tog is the best, along with Moreno's hybrid, but it's just that in the current meta it can't work (scepter, because with putrefy, deeds or hate vs affinity). However, in about 1 and a half, max 2 months I think this will die down soon, as affinity didnt prove itself at the PT and that the rock will lose popularity to also bad results. So the deck to play is SCEPTER-TOG.
This is why you always have to be one step ahead of everyone else; think one step beyond everyone else what the next meta will be etc.
Scepter tog has so many stronger strengths than UB that i dont even need to explain it. Faster, more explosive, better card quality (no situational force spikes), better sticks, same creatures but more choices, better card draw and more colors with the amazing fire/ice. The only weakness would be the hate+ inconsistency/manabase. But the strengths make up the weaknesses and when the meta changes, ScepterTog will be the one.
People were saying the same crap last year "bla bla, too much affinity (which was popular, since Canali had won the PT and every scrub and his mother were running the vial mage afinity deck, scepter-tog is never gonna be good bla bla" well i still sure did win my local ptq with just scepter-tog. People have THE FEAR, and THE FEAR is what makes you lose. It has everything Scepter-chant has, + better creatures, access to black for cranial ext, duress, better removal in smother, fire/ice etc.Scepter-tog is the deck. |
While you make some good points (though I won't comment on the Scepter-Tog thing, having no idea whether or not it is good, personally), I think your metagame analysis is a little off. Specifically, I expect Affinity and Rock to remain popular in the PTQ season, along with PT underachiever Goblins. Looking specifically at the last Extended season, Rock was the most popular deck at PT Columbus, and did the worst out of any archetype. However, Rock still made a showing during the PTQ season. And it did about as well as the other popular archetypes. I wouldn't discount any of these decks right now, as just a little bit of tuning or tech could turn any one of them into a show-stealer at your next Qualifier or GP. Affinity remains (possibly) the most broken mechanic ever, and a deck with the synergy of Goblins or the track record of Rock should never be completely discounted. Underestimate them at your own peril. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Y2Jonline
Joined: 08 Sep 2004 Posts: 92
|
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2005 9:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
| YakuzaXRock wrote: | All the versions have strenghts/weaknesses.
Scepter-tog is the best of the 5 builds (you forgot to mention just green with deeds without life enginge, but i guess that build maybe outdated due to life runs the same now anyway, and Billys tog/madness hybrid). I think, however, that many players (including me) have not tested and understood LoTL tog yet (yes, that means you, magic league noober you havent played it enough) and that's why nobody should actually answer this question. Come back in 2 months, then your answers are more valid.
Until then, my argument is:
UBr Scepter-tog is the best, along with Moreno's hybrid, but it's just that in the current meta it can't work (scepter, because with putrefy, deeds or hate vs affinity). However, in about 1 and a half, max 2 months I think this will die down soon, as affinity didnt prove itself at the PT and that the rock will lose popularity to also bad results. So the deck to play is SCEPTER-TOG.
This is why you always have to be one step ahead of everyone else; think one step beyond everyone else what the next meta will be etc.
Scepter tog has so many stronger strengths than UB that i dont even need to explain it. Faster, more explosive, better card quality (no situational force spikes), better sticks, same creatures but more choices, better card draw and more colors with the amazing fire/ice. The only weakness would be the hate+ inconsistency/manabase. But the strengths make up the weaknesses and when the meta changes, ScepterTog will be the one.
People were saying the same crap last year "bla bla, too much affinity (which was popular, since Canali had won the PT and every scrub and his mother were running the vial mage afinity deck, scepter-tog is never gonna be good bla bla" well i still sure did win my local ptq with just scepter-tog. People have THE FEAR, and THE FEAR is what makes you lose. It has everything Scepter-chant has, + better creatures, access to black for cranial ext, duress, better removal in smother, fire/ice etc.Scepter-tog is the deck. |
While you make some good points (though I won't comment on the Scepter-Tog thing, having no idea whether or not it is good, personally), I think your metagame analysis is a little off. Specifically, I expect Affinity and Rock to remain popular in the PTQ season, along with PT underachiever Goblins. Looking specifically at the last Extended season, Rock was the most popular deck at PT Columbus, and did the worst out of any archetype. However, Rock still made a showing during the PTQ season. And it did about as well as the other popular archetypes. I wouldn't discount any of these decks right now, as just a little bit of tuning or tech could turn any one of them into a show-stealer at your next Qualifier or GP. Affinity remains (possibly) the most broken mechanic ever, and a deck with the synergy of Goblins or the track record of Rock should never be completely discounted. Underestimate them at your own peril. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ChristPunchr
Joined: 01 Sep 2004 Posts: 359
|
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2005 10:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Patience young one, partience. Double posting makes you look like a fool. Did scepter tog even manage to place in the top sixteen? Conisidering the seeming poularity of chromos, swords/jittes and chant decks overall, omitting scepter from your tog deck is prbably a good idea. One less weakness on the board gives your opponent more dead cards and more room for your sideboard choices to come out of no where...I could be wrong but I am a firm believer that there is still tech out there. Pro tour just showed us how one very lame(lacking character etc,not quality...tog is good,we all know that)deck can come on top(heh heh). Judging by the decks by the numbers along with the huge list of repetitive decks the format is still by and large unexplored. It is proven that for extended and standard of the days of yor that if you don't really know what to expect exactly,play permission. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
idler
Joined: 31 Aug 2004 Posts: 80
|
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2005 12:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| wraith8 wrote: | First of all UB tog is not better than UBG Dredg-a-tog. It just has different matchups.....
First, Dredg-a-tog has a far better matchup against balencing tings. IN certain metagames, (Especially in LA, there were a lot of tings decks including Nassif and Oisio's) this is important. Dredg-a-tog does have a worse time against decks with lots of card drawing and permission, such as classic tog and NO-stick.
Interestingly enough, The Troll-a-Tog deck piloted by Siron, Jones, and Da Costa Cabral, has more life from the loams (3) and no gifts, and still manages to find the engine easily enough. Because of this, more life from the loams increases the decks ability to handle such matchups.
Which tog do you choose? Depends on the metagame in my opinion (though i like Moreno's madness-tog and the troll a tog deck more than the other two ) |
Out of the games ive played with ruels list vs Tings i havent lost a single one. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Okmar
Joined: 26 Feb 2005 Posts: 383
|
Posted: Tue Feb 07, 2006 10:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
just cause you dislike what people say dosent make them idiotic, sry if you dont understand this concept then give up in life now...you will be screwed  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dr_Moo
Joined: 26 Nov 2004 Posts: 950
|
Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2006 5:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nassif went 3-0 with Scepter Tog at the Invitational last year. It's viable, at worst.
Tog in any form is largely irrelevant right now, though. The two best decks in extended are Ichorid and Affinity, both of which demolish Tog. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DarkSabre
Joined: 31 Aug 2004 Posts: 5
|
Posted: Fri Mar 10, 2006 7:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The reason that cunning wish is not used is because it is slow, and inherently card disadvantage...
You are spending 2U to nothing to board position... and you are wishing for somehting that your deck should be able to handle in the mainboard. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kholdstare
Joined: 30 Apr 2005 Posts: 49
|
Posted: Mon Apr 10, 2006 9:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
| i would like to throw out there for people who watched the webcasts of teh finals not to base your opinion on that...because billy moreno was playing like an idiot. also, there was an interesting conversation about whether control beats aggro control or if aggro control beats control. they compared these two decks and mike flores said he would rather play antoines deck because the mana base is more consistant. however he also said he thoguht billys deck was the best deck in the top 8...very interesting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|