|
|
| Author |
Message |
snarles2
Joined: 07 Sep 2007 Posts: 15
|
Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2007 7:59 pm Post subject: Trample |
|
|
I attack with Treetop Village and he blocks with Phyrexian Ironfoot. I play Incinerate before damage. Can I trample for 2?
Let's say he blocks with a Stuffy Doll instead of Ironfoot. Again I Incinerate the blocker. Can I trample for 3? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HHH1
Joined: 10 Apr 2007 Posts: 17
|
Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2007 8:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
1 your a terrible player
2 only an idiot whould incenerate there opps stuffy doll |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
snarles2
Joined: 07 Sep 2007 Posts: 15
|
Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2007 8:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well, he also had a Temporal Isolation'd Purity. Duh.
EDIT: Sorry about this post, the troll doesn't get it anyways...
Last edited by snarles2 on Wed Nov 28, 2007 8:22 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HHH1
Joined: 10 Apr 2007 Posts: 17
|
Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2007 8:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| snarles2 wrote: | | Well, he also had a Temporal Isolation'd Purity. Duh. | this is relevent how? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Athios
Joined: 11 Dec 2005 Posts: 11
|
Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2007 8:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The way trample works is that you have to assign lethal damage to the creature before you assign the trample damage. In the first case lethal damage to the ironfoot it 1 so you would hit for 2.
In the second case stuffy doll is indistructable so even after the incenerate hits when treetop goes to assign damage it has to assign one damage to the stuff. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hardtrack
Joined: 10 Aug 2005 Posts: 234
|
Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2007 8:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lets get the dictionary out, shall we?
hypothetical
A adjective
1 hypothetical, hypothetic
based on hypothesis; "a hypothetical situation"; "the site of a hypothetical colony"
He just wants to know how trample works. If you can't be polite and/or at least answer the question, just don't post.
Yes, both your examples are correct. A trampling creature has to assign what is called lethal damage to all blocking creatures, the rest can be assigned to the defending player. Lethal damage = toughness - damage already taken. A 3/4 with three damage will thus only have to be assigned 1 damage and an indestructible 0/1 with two damage will not have to be assigned any damage at all.
| Athios wrote: | | In the second case stuffy doll is indistructable so even after the incenerate hits when treetop goes to assign damage it has to assign one damage to the stuff. |
No, it doesn't. It'll be a 0/1 with two damage on it. Therefor, lethal damage has already been dealt to it. That that fails to destroy it doesn't change this (nor remove the damage).
Last edited by Hardtrack on Wed Nov 28, 2007 8:40 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HHH1
Joined: 10 Apr 2007 Posts: 17
|
Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2007 8:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Ill post when and where i want to and ill write what ever i want |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hardtrack
Joined: 10 Aug 2005 Posts: 234
|
Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2007 8:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, that is, sadly, the downside of freedom of speech. But as Voltaire said (and I'm paraphrasing now):
'I may think you're an idiot and disagree with what you say, but I’ll defend to the death your right to say it' |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kendiggy
Joined: 30 Nov 2004 Posts: 366 Location: not here
|
Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2007 9:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| HHH1, while you certainly do have the ability to post what, when and where you want to, there are rules. If you can't/won't abide by the rules, certain measures can be taken to remove your posting privileges. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HHH1
Joined: 10 Apr 2007 Posts: 17
|
Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2007 10:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| kendiggy wrote: | | HHH1, while you certainly do have the ability to post what, when and where you want to, there are rules. If you can't/won't abide by the rules, certain measures can be taken to remove your posting privileges. | Thats not how i meant it i meant it like if i wanna say a decks dumb im gonna say the decks dumb |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
thedarkness
Joined: 13 Jul 2006 Posts: 449
|
Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2007 10:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
That was actually exactly the same as what you said before.
Trolling needs to be a bannable offense. -.- |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ant900
Joined: 11 Oct 2004 Posts: 2470 Location: somewhere
|
Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2007 10:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| thedarkness wrote: | That was actually exactly the same as what you said before.
Trolling needs to be a bannable offense. -.- |
i believe it is a bannable offense, they just need to do it a lot |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Black_Dog
Joined: 29 Sep 2006 Posts: 159
|
Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2007 4:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
I nominate HHH1 for Assjerk of the Year!
Funny how you when reading a forum here, you can just skip the first post because its always some wannabe guy who Im sure advertises on MWS with T2 PRO 1900+ RATING TIER 1 OR I QUIT!
Too bad HHH1 didn't seem to break that mold. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|