|
|
| Which is better, Dark Confidant or Psychatog? |
| Psychatog |
|
54% |
[ 39 ] |
| Dark Confidant |
|
45% |
[ 32 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 71 |
|
| Author |
Message |
therooster
Joined: 09 Oct 2005 Posts: 27
|
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 1:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Ya Meddling Mage is another solid hitter, as well as Goblin Welder. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kevinconvery
Joined: 24 Jan 2006 Posts: 30
|
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 2:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have to agree:
Bob > Tog
Bob can be used in far more situations.
Plus, there's plenty of ways to thwart Tog. Sudden Shock, anyone? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Paellin
Joined: 11 Jun 2006 Posts: 149
|
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 2:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
pfft, obviously squire is better...
1) it chumps confident.
2) it chumps Tog.
3) it chumps mongrel. (another good card that im surprised nobody's brought up)
4) it chumps ichorid.
5) its vanilla, which gives you major style points for playing a vanilla 1/2 for 2.
6) in conclusion, the only viable win conditions are tendrils and brain freeze. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DRINKALCOHOL
Joined: 28 Mar 2006 Posts: 268 Location: New Gunsqu
|
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 2:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I agree, island is broken |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Russell_Nash
Joined: 05 Jan 2006 Posts: 694 Location: Burn Ward
|
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 2:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| kevinconvery wrote: | | Bob can be used in far more situations. |
Tog is the best creature to overcome the only situation that matters, wining. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Spyx
Joined: 31 Oct 2004 Posts: 680
|
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 2:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Russell_Nash wrote: | | i would say meddling mage is better then Bob, but not then Tog. Meddling mage can slow opponent from wining but Tog Wins in 1 hit. |
Actually Meddling Mage can totally prevent the opponent from winning, which matters just as much as winning. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Shivan1
Joined: 14 Oct 2006 Posts: 36
|
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 3:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Confidant can win games by *drawing* you into cards... I don't see how that is any different than attacking in for damage in one turn. Card advantage wins games, regardless of format. Bob > Tog.
edit: the comparison is still stupid, but bob is a more powerful single card than tog. Tog needs a whole deck built around him as a win condition, while bob can stand alone in almost any deck and help that deck WIN WIN WIN. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kev
Joined: 31 Aug 2004 Posts: 55
|
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 3:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think Tog is stronger, as it got cards banned and restricted (GUSH!) Confidant is just a personal howling mine. dv8r gets togs point wrong
it turns a control deck into a control deck with a combo kill. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Onkel420
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 150
|
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 4:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| kevinconvery wrote: | I have to agree:
Bob > Tog
Bob can be used in far more situations.
Plus, there's plenty of ways to thwart Tog. Sudden Shock, anyone? |
Oh yes, I forgot Bob doesn't die to Sudden Shock and basically every removal ever created.
Tog. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hank333
Joined: 23 Oct 2006 Posts: 123 Location: San Antoni
|
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 4:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Its not a good compairision. They do completely diffrent things. Its not like compairing Dismiss vs counterspell or something. They are very diffrent cards for very diffrent decks.
You can't throw in Tog into you aggro deck and you don't throw bob into you BU control.
One good point though is you never need to kill your own tog when you are at 1 life... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TugaChampion
Joined: 26 Jan 2006 Posts: 222
|
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 4:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | Tog defines every metagame he is legal in(save extend as of late, due to sudden shock which, imo, was specifically designed to kill tog in extended). |
Last time I checked tog doesn't define Legacy nor Vintage.
Bob is better. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NahHolmes
Joined: 13 Jan 2005 Posts: 561
|
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 5:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| TugaChampion wrote: | | Quote: | | Tog defines every metagame he is legal in(save extend as of late, due to sudden shock which, imo, was specifically designed to kill tog in extended). |
Last time I checked tog doesn't define Legacy nor Vintage.
Bob is better. |
For a good amount of time Psycatog was the #1 Vintage deck. Back when Legacy was 1.5 and Gush/Mana Drain was legal as a 4x, Tog had quite the impact on "Legacy". |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Russell_Nash
Joined: 05 Jan 2006 Posts: 694 Location: Burn Ward
|
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 5:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You people are freaking ridiculous. Bob requires more building then Tog, in the sense that you don’t wana play a control deck with him or a deck that has high casting cost spells. Tog is so freaking good that if your playing UB and hes legal theres NO REASON why you shouldn’t play him. He fits into standard UB control and even splashing B in madness like in PT LA which got 2nd place.
More to the point, I don’t really see the connection of how much you need to build a deck around a card as a negative in its worth. Is mind's desire a terrible card cause you have to devote a whole deck to running it? In fact I think it’s the whole opposite, the better a card is the more you WOULD devote your deck to running it more effetely.
For all you people that say tog sucks because of Sudden shock, thats only a half truth. Anything that can kill a Tog can kill a Bob, its just bob has never been so good as to when people see sudden shock they think "yes, this will kill bob easy" and thats because bob has never been a serious threat.
The whole creation of sudden shock itself speaks volumes as to the raw power of Tog, that they had to create a card that basically unconditionally kills it in every situation to get it out of extended.
Spyx: meddling mage doesn’t always prevent a deck from wining, if a deck has to play a single card to win, they tend to take meddling mage in mind and put hate on him. Meddling mages is by far better then Bob and is much more comparable then Tog. Tog says I win, Mage says you dont win/not yet, Bob says im gaining card advantage at the cost of life. Those are 3 whole different elements, I just think the I WIN is a little more important.
| TugaChampion wrote: | | Last time I checked tog doesn't define Legacy nor Vintage. |
and i supose Bob has come closer? also no one cares about legacy or vintage cause they are busted. For the sake of the Tog vs Bob i think it would be best if we kept it to extended and standard(the formats people care about.) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Eldariel
Joined: 15 Jun 2006 Posts: 124
|
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 5:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Russell_Nash wrote: | | Tog is the most powerful creature ever printed. Period. He ALONE straight up wins games in 1 turn, how is that not the best creature ever? Tog defines every metagame he is legal in(save extend as of late, due to sudden shock which, imo, was specifically designed to kill tog in extended). |
It's also little played in Legacy and almost unplayed in Vintage nowadays, so there're 5 current constructed formats in which he's almost unplayed (Standard, for obvious reasons, Extended due to Sudden Shock, Sudden Death, Smother, etc.; Legacy due to fast little red men and combo that rapes control, Vintage due to decks that generate card advantage just winning with something broken, like stuff you can Tinker up, or Wish for). Presently, Confidant is doing much better due to his utility-role (he's played in multiple Legacy- and Vintage-decks), rather than finisher-role, but I don't think the two creatures are comparable. One is a wannabe Phyrexian Arena, the other is a cheap BFM. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Russell_Nash
Joined: 05 Jan 2006 Posts: 694 Location: Burn Ward
|
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 5:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Eldariel: no shit tog doesn’t have an impact on current standard, hes not legal. If you wana talk standard tog you have to talk about the standard HE WAS IN! and he dominated.
Extened, Tog dominated up until R&D felt like flipping extended on its head with the introduction of split second. If you would also notice in included this clause in my statment you qouted.
Vintage and Legacy: again, no one cares about type 1 and 1.5.
and as for the 5th constructed format you mention: I guess well just wait till it gets created before you can talk about how good the cards in it are. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|