 |
Magic-League.com Forums of Magic-League: Free Online Magic: the Gathering Play with Apprentice and Magic Workstation; casual or tournament play.
|
|
|
| Author |
Message |
Gerrardfo
Joined: 04 Sep 2004 Posts: 326
|
Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 4:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | Well, after seeing a couple of Owling Mine decks, I thought "I'm bored. I think I'll have fun making one." So I made one that I think would work quite well. In the practice run, it had a 4th turn victory. Any feedback and constructive critcism would be nice. Please don't come in this thread ranting about how I took another idea. This was just an edit of another deck.
Creatures
3 - Kaijin of the Vanishing Touch (In case of weenie, and clasm-proof)
4 - Kami of the Crescent Moon (Any questions?)
3 - Adamaro, First to Desire (A bit of Aggro never hurts, eh?)
Artifacts
4 - Howling Mine (Why are you reading the explanation?)
4 - Ebony Owl Netsuke (Again, why??)
Instants/Sorceries
3 - Cerebral Vortex (...They draw a lot?)
4 - Sudden Impact (Don't make me slap you.)
3 - Pyroclasm (Weenie/Zoo removal)
2 - Gaze of Adamaro (Alternative to Impact)
3 - Remand (Delay)
1 - Evacuation (Break glass in case of flood)
2 - Spiraling Embers (In case they SB One with Nothing)
Lands
4 - Steam Vents
4 - Shivan Reaf
8 - Mountain
8 - Island
Sideboard
3 - Thoughts of Ruin (Slow them down as Owl and Mine work)
3 - Zo-zu the Punisher (More damage? Might take this out.)
2 - Spiraling Embers (Back-up)
1 - Cerebral Vortex (Just in case)
4 - Mana Leak (Awesome counter)
2 - Evacuation (Back-up) |
As posted by Kaishi. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Vegantoad
Joined: 12 Nov 2005 Posts: 44
|
Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 8:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
i've had success with this sb
4x consuming vortex
4x threads of disloyalty
4x imaginary pet
3x bloodmoon
but the deck is a great deck..and totally fun to play which is really what matters |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gizmo17
Joined: 02 Jul 2005 Posts: 13
|
Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 2:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| how does owl beat ruels b/w though??? What do u side in and out?? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ElvishGod
Joined: 12 May 2005 Posts: 2929
|
Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 4:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Gerrardfo wrote: | | Quote: | Well, after seeing a couple of Owling Mine decks, I thought "I'm bored. I think I'll have fun making one." So I made one that I think would work quite well. In the practice run, it had a 4th turn victory. Any feedback and constructive critcism would be nice. Please don't come in this thread ranting about how I took another idea. This was just an edit of another deck.
Creatures
3 - Kaijin of the Vanishing Touch (In case of weenie, and clasm-proof)
4 - Kami of the Crescent Moon (Any questions?)
3 - Adamaro, First to Desire (A bit of Aggro never hurts, eh?)
Artifacts
4 - Howling Mine (Why are you reading the explanation?)
4 - Ebony Owl Netsuke (Again, why??)
Instants/Sorceries
3 - Cerebral Vortex (...They draw a lot?)
4 - Sudden Impact (Don't make me slap you.)
3 - Pyroclasm (Weenie/Zoo removal)
2 - Gaze of Adamaro (Alternative to Impact)
3 - Remand (Delay)
1 - Evacuation (Break glass in case of flood)
2 - Spiraling Embers (In case they SB One with Nothing)
Lands
4 - Steam Vents
4 - Shivan Reaf
8 - Mountain
8 - Island
Sideboard
3 - Thoughts of Ruin (Slow them down as Owl and Mine work)
3 - Zo-zu the Punisher (More damage? Might take this out.)
2 - Spiraling Embers (Back-up)
1 - Cerebral Vortex (Just in case)
4 - Mana Leak (Awesome counter)
2 - Evacuation (Back-up) |
As posted by Kaishi. |
No Muddle?!?!?!?! No Twincast?
Also, Thoughts of Ruins is fucking broken in owling mine!
Idk, but I think more decks should run in MD... Someone test it! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
blkaznguy4
Joined: 04 Jun 2005 Posts: 82
|
Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 4:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ElvishGod wrote: | | Gerrardfo wrote: | | Quote: | Well, after seeing a couple of Owling Mine decks, I thought "I'm bored. I think I'll have fun making one." So I made one that I think would work quite well. In the practice run, it had a 4th turn victory. Any feedback and constructive critcism would be nice. Please don't come in this thread ranting about how I took another idea. This was just an edit of another deck.
Creatures
3 - Kaijin of the Vanishing Touch (In case of weenie, and clasm-proof)
4 - Kami of the Crescent Moon (Any questions?)
3 - Adamaro, First to Desire (A bit of Aggro never hurts, eh?)
Artifacts
4 - Howling Mine (Why are you reading the explanation?)
4 - Ebony Owl Netsuke (Again, why??)
Instants/Sorceries
3 - Cerebral Vortex (...They draw a lot?)
4 - Sudden Impact (Don't make me slap you.)
3 - Pyroclasm (Weenie/Zoo removal)
2 - Gaze of Adamaro (Alternative to Impact)
3 - Remand (Delay)
1 - Evacuation (Break glass in case of flood)
2 - Spiraling Embers (In case they SB One with Nothing)
Lands
4 - Steam Vents
4 - Shivan Reaf
8 - Mountain
8 - Island
Sideboard
3 - Thoughts of Ruin (Slow them down as Owl and Mine work)
3 - Zo-zu the Punisher (More damage? Might take this out.)
2 - Spiraling Embers (Back-up)
1 - Cerebral Vortex (Just in case)
4 - Mana Leak (Awesome counter)
2 - Evacuation (Back-up) |
As posted by Kaishi. |
No Muddle?!?!?!?! No Twincast?
Also, Thoughts of Ruins is fucking broken in owling mine!
Idk, but I think more decks should run in MD... Someone test it! |
Well the thoughts of using Thoughts of Ruins would be kewl, i think the reason why no one ever uses it is probably the fact that ... killing your own lands would hurt you more then your opponent in the aggro game. You can't rele do crap if you don't got the lands. and in the control field it probably doesn't matter anymore due to the anti control focus MD |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kaishi
Joined: 13 Mar 2006 Posts: 17
|
Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 7:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well, this is awkward. o_O
But anyways, the reason for Thoughts of Ruin is to eliminate the amount of cards your opponent plays from their hand per turn, thus disabling them to get things out quickly. Plus, it makes it easier to counter if they have less lands. All in all, I resulted in it being a good card to have in the sideboard just in case. Funny thing is, it's also a good killer of the oh-so-annoying Boseiju.
The only difficulty I ran into later in testing is the Spiraling Embers. I might remove those and replace them with Exhaustion or something. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
blkaznguy4
Joined: 04 Jun 2005 Posts: 82
|
Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 8:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Kaishi wrote: | Well, this is awkward. o_O
But anyways, the reason for Thoughts of Ruin is to eliminate the amount of cards your opponent plays from their hand per turn, thus disabling them to get things out quickly. Plus, it makes it easier to counter if they have less lands. All in all, I resulted in it being a good card to have in the sideboard just in case. Funny thing is, it's also a good killer of the oh-so-annoying Boseiju.
The only difficulty I ran into later in testing is the Spiraling Embers. I might remove those and replace them with Exhaustion or something. |
its scary for me to think that you can play owl without exhaustion ... its the perfect tempo killer ... like those annoying brothers that screw over the romantic mood of the date right b4 you get to do anything -.- ... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kaishi
Joined: 13 Mar 2006 Posts: 17
|
Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 8:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| blkaznguy4 wrote: | | Kaishi wrote: | Well, this is awkward. o_O
But anyways, the reason for Thoughts of Ruin is to eliminate the amount of cards your opponent plays from their hand per turn, thus disabling them to get things out quickly. Plus, it makes it easier to counter if they have less lands. All in all, I resulted in it being a good card to have in the sideboard just in case. Funny thing is, it's also a good killer of the oh-so-annoying Boseiju.
The only difficulty I ran into later in testing is the Spiraling Embers. I might remove those and replace them with Exhaustion or something. |
its scary for me to think that you can play owl without exhaustion ... its the perfect tempo killer ... like those annoying brothers that screw over the romantic mood of the date right b4 you get to do anything -.- ... |
Yeah, I know. o.o Dont'cha just hate it when... Oh, back on subject. Well, the reason there were no exhaustions in the first build is because I totally forgot about the card, to be honest with you. @_@ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
brockestell
Joined: 04 Feb 2006 Posts: 5
|
Posted: Thu Mar 16, 2006 1:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I already have built my green/red deck and have it pretty much finished. So I figured for deck #2 I'd build an Owling Mine deck... It's a fun deck and I enjoy it. I was thinking for sideboard in my local meta to be something like this: Keiga, Meloku, pyroclasm and counter even more counter spells... something like Convolute with hierarchs as fourth turn drops may work? I dunno I'm just messing with this deck right now though. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gizmo17
Joined: 02 Jul 2005 Posts: 13
|
Posted: Thu Mar 16, 2006 9:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
My sideboard is:
4x Pyroclasm
4x Remove Soul
3x Blood Moon
4x Threads of Disloyalty
I though it was good for all around. Any suggestions?? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Whitefire
Joined: 16 Mar 2006 Posts: 2
|
Posted: Fri Mar 17, 2006 1:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
It's new, it's funny, but most of all, it works. The rise of this deck has been enjoyable for everyone, I know the first thing that you said when you played this deck was "what the hell is this?". After losing to it painfully a few times, everyone wants to find out how to beat it, and sadly, I believe there's a few decks that cannot, most are able to at least sideboard against it though.
First of all, if you can play at this deck's tempo, you have a fair chance at beating it, we all know one deck that is capable of this, why red aggro of course, it may be a good idea to sideboard damage cards to replace creatures, it'll be easier to shoot damage through when it can't be bounced, I guess I would keep vashino sandstalkers in, they're the only thing that ensures that the more than hardy kami of the crescent moon cannot block. Frenzied goblins are amazing at slipping damage through aswell.
But what if you don't play red aggro, like most of magic? well there isn't too much you can do to avoid bounce, in control all you can really do is counter bounces and cards like owl, in zoo and other aggros, they can't bounce your giant solifuge, and that will help you punch damage through. A great sideboard secret weapon for control, given that you are running black, is one with nothing, put three of four into your sideboard to force your opponent to waste an impact, and maybe even a twincast.
The biggest trick to winning is tempo, owling mine is geared towards slowing you down for a more than good reason, so you don't beat them while they get set up, their only real defense is counters, even in control, weenies should help you get some nice damage it. All the life loss and direct damage that you can get in will help too, char will be a great help for sure.
Remember that if people don't keep stopping this deck in mind, it will become an unstoppable force. Your sideboard may be your only defense in beating this deck, so prepare well, and you can turn the tides around against this hilarious deck.
And one more thought for the night.. has anyone tried running Adamaro in their owling mine decks yet? seems like you may need to gear slightly more towards red but he could be a big help in both damage and defenses.(EDIT: i've seen a few now, but still i'm just getting that concept out there, a lot of the honolulu decks neglected to use it, perhaps with reason, but it definately feels like a card worth trying) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kaishi
Joined: 13 Mar 2006 Posts: 17
|
Posted: Fri Mar 17, 2006 3:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Whitefire wrote: | | And one more thought for the night.. has anyone tried running Adamaro in their owling mine decks yet? seems like you may need to gear slightly more towards red but he could be a big help in both damage and defenses.(EDIT: i've seen a few now, but still i'm just getting that concept out there, a lot of the honolulu decks neglected to use it, perhaps with reason, but it definately feels like a card worth trying) | I ran Adamaro in mine. It's actually a very good addition. Even if you don't want to go on an assault with him, he can stand back and pick off little guys as a blocker. With lots of drawing, when I have him in play, he's usually around a 6/6 or 7/7. It's definitely worth trying. The only thing I see that would cripple him is One With Nothing. But then again, that's the anti-owl card. So of course it will. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
red_horse
Joined: 05 Nov 2005 Posts: 13
|
Posted: Sat Mar 18, 2006 10:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
well, now we know why WOTC made "one with nothing"  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mainichi
Joined: 27 Sep 2004 Posts: 14
|
Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2006 4:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Just wanted to post the version of this deck I put together and get some feedback. I know Owl "sucks" but I rather enjoy playing it and would like to put the best version I can together so any help would be great.
4xebony owl
4xhowling mine
4xboomerang
3xeye of nowhere
4xremand
3xkami of the crescent moon
3xsudden impact
3xcerebral vortex
2xpyroclasm
3xelectrolyze
3xniv-mizzet, the firemind
2xtwincast
4xsteam vents
4xshivan reef
8xisland
6xmountain
SB:
3xthoughts of ruin
2xevacuation
1xelectrolyze
2xwildfire
2xtwincast
1xeye of nowhere
2xadamaro-first to desire
2xpyroclasm |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TIm_54
Joined: 28 Jul 2005 Posts: 27
|
Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2006 9:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
| ive heard this said and i agree cerebreal vortex is just a win more card it is almost always sitting in your hand while you play all those other cards when i play this i always have it just sitting in my hand intill theres nothing else worth while to play. and i truthfully think my version might be able to stand up against zoo i have 4 mainboard pyroclasm 4 gigadroswe and im trying to make room for storage matrix which is realy good in here. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|