|
|
| Author |
Message |
ElvenLord
Joined: 03 Jul 2005
Posts: 7
|
 Posted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 11:40 am Post subject: |
 |
|
Black Lotus is a card that shouldnt be banned at all or after few rounds we will have all 1cc cards banned  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
COOLBOY
Joined: 03 Jul 2005
Posts: 399
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Even if you did channel fireball for a "draw" wouldnt you still lose by taking 20 first? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
NahHolmes
Joined: 13 Jan 2005
Posts: 583
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| DRjester wrote: | | it is easy to design a deck that will draw just about every match. For example, black lotus/hymn to tourach/sarcomancy will win just about every game where it goes first, but i have a hard time believeing it will win much going second. The hard thing will be making a deck that can win going first or second. |
Except that part about all cards that make you discard more then 1 card are banned. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
WildCard
Joined: 06 Sep 2004
Posts: 735
Location: Japan
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 1:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| if you read the rules hymn is banned. you cannot have a card that makes your opponent discard more than 1 card. also ive looked at some of the decks. keeping in mind that both players will make the best play.. there are a few matches that.. neither player will play a card. because playing a card would lose them the game. the game will be a draw. i also have a small pannel of debators that i can call in for the tougher matches. yes its only 3 card. and it is pretty strait forward. but any draws i will confide in frinds to confirm. there are going to be alot of draws. in fact 2 people have already sent me the same exact deck. its pretty funny. and yes, lotus looks like it will be banned. and whoever wins.. there cards are banned in addition. i was also thinking that between each reound randomly UNBANNING a card. hows that idea sound? ill put them in alphabetical order and roll a dice for it. LATERS |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Blake-
Moderator
Joined: 02 Sep 2004
Posts: 195
Location: Wisconsin
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 2:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| i am going to win. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Pizat
Joined: 02 Sep 2005
Posts: 41
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 7:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| do we just PM you decklists? (lol 3 card deck list) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ant900
Joined: 11 Oct 2004
Posts: 2474
Location: somewhere
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 7:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Pizat wrote: | | do we just PM you decklists? (lol 3 card deck list) |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Zardokk
Joined: 08 Nov 2005
Posts: 45
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 7:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm running affinity  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Lackeos
Joined: 10 Oct 2004
Posts: 236
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 10:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| h0m3r wrote: | you can channel hurricane for the draw though  |
Nope. Channel Hurricane costs 20GGG to draw. You would need to pay 20 life to Channel. You can Black Lotus / Channel / Darksteel Colossus, though. It's a little different.
| DRjester wrote: | I don't believe that any of the "normal" combos will work in this format - ie timevault/flame fusilade don't work because of mana issues.
Another thing to note - it is easy to design a deck that will draw just about every match. For example, black lotus/hymn to tourach/sarcomancy will win just about every game where it goes first, but i have a hard time believeing it will win much going second. The hard thing will be making a deck that can win going first or second. |
Timevault/Flame Fusilade can work, but you need Mercadian Bazaar to supply the mana.
You couldn't think of a deck that's better at drawing matches? ... Tropical Island / Foil / Basking Rootwalla
The deck I designed wins going first or second in several match-ups, but has its weaknesses. After long stretches of testing, it doesn't appear to be the best deck, though. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Enyeez
Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 55
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 11:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I kinda enjoyed the deck I beat Wildcard with in rabbits games
gg Wildcard
good to see you've brought it up again |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
NahHolmes
Joined: 13 Jan 2005
Posts: 583
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 10, 2006 12:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Lackeos wrote: | | h0m3r wrote: | | you can channel hurricane for the draw though |
Nope. Channel Hurricane costs 20GGG to draw. You would need to pay 20 life to Channel. You can Black Lotus / Channel / Darksteel Colossus, though. It's a little different.
| DRjester wrote: | I don't believe that any of the "normal" combos will work in this format - ie timevault/flame fusilade don't work because of mana issues.
Another thing to note - it is easy to design a deck that will draw just about every match. For example, black lotus/hymn to tourach/sarcomancy will win just about every game where it goes first, but i have a hard time believeing it will win much going second. The hard thing will be making a deck that can win going first or second. |
Timevault/Flame Fusilade can work, but you need Mercadian Bazaar to supply the mana.
You couldn't think of a deck that's better at drawing matches? ... Tropical Island / Foil / Basking Rootwalla
The deck I designed wins going first or second in several match-ups, but has its weaknesses. After long stretches of testing, it doesn't appear to be the best deck, though. |
Whoa dog take it easy, don't drop any lists here especially if they're top tier. Kinda spoils the fun. I mean if 2 people have the same list they get the same score and noone wins. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Lackeos
Joined: 10 Oct 2004
Posts: 236
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 10, 2006 12:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
haha, agreed, that list is garbage though. It's like...
draw draw
draw draw
lose lose
draw draw
draw draw
8 points lol |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
NahHolmes
Joined: 13 Jan 2005
Posts: 583
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 10, 2006 1:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Lackeos wrote: | haha, agreed, that list is garbage though. It's like...
draw draw
draw draw
lose lose
draw draw
draw draw
8 points lol |
Yeah IDK it beats some lists, like the ones that try to drop one big creature. My list is hardcore. I can't imagine not winning. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Lackeos
Joined: 10 Oct 2004
Posts: 236
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 10, 2006 1:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
It's still a draw, though, because if they just don't cast the creature, then it's a draw, unless the draw deck goes "Tropical Island, Walla," then the big creature deck goes "lol, you can't play foil, drop my big fella," and thus... whoever flinches loses.
I hope your deck isn't the same as my deck. Because my deck is hardcore, and I want to change it. It doesn't have as good of win percentages as a certain other deck. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Trotsky1
Joined: 12 Apr 2005
Posts: 658
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 10, 2006 10:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Is battle of wits banned? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
