|
|
| Author |
Message |
mandanglelow
Joined: 15 Nov 2005 Posts: 110
|
Posted: Tue Feb 14, 2006 4:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| thanks |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
snoopster
Joined: 04 Dec 2004 Posts: 739 Location: nj
|
Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2006 6:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Coolboy, stop complaining. You HAVE NO CLUE as to what you are talking about. The Owl deck has been doing extremely well recently on modo, and I expect it to do fairly well at Honolulu as well. All this thread is doing is making you sound like an idiot, anf you're not even correct in the first place. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
WildCard
Joined: 06 Sep 2004 Posts: 735 Location: Japan
|
Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2006 6:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
| id rather have all my opponents play crappy decks and lose vs me. but thats my opinion. i dont know exactly what this is about but i saw "shitty decks" "stop posting"... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
COOLBOY
Joined: 03 Jul 2005 Posts: 399
|
Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2006 12:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I' rather play against decent decks when it doesnt count, ie m-l. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
snoopster
Joined: 04 Dec 2004 Posts: 739 Location: nj
|
Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2006 1:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Owl.dec is sooo much better than decent. Plz complain about something you know about. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
blkaznguy4
Joined: 04 Jun 2005 Posts: 82
|
Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2006 1:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I'd like to say Owl.dec is ok i guess ... if ur alive by turn 4+, besides that all you've got are pyroclasms and evacs to save ur butt, if u hit RW winnie or RGW Zoo, you might as well scoop. If only there was more def. against aggro besides jus Pyroclasm and Evacuation for this UR owl dec ... >< |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
limbs
Joined: 31 Mar 2005 Posts: 1
|
Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2006 1:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| it is a fine deck |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mchild80
Joined: 24 Mar 2005 Posts: 16
|
Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2006 4:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kilomitro wrote
| Quote: | | the deck only wins if A) the deck goes first B) your oppnent dosnt know what ur playing and dosnt mull (who knew it was tech) C) you playing a control deck. |
the things you say about owl are the exact things i said about magnivore when i first saw it (well maybe not the mull part). even though i think like that doesn't mean that it's a bad deck. regardless of how i feel about both decks, they still have pretty good records last time i saw (magnivore's record is probably a lil better tho). all i'm basically saying is just because you don't like the win condition (yea i know that givin ur opponent card advantage is bad) of the deck, regardless, it still wins.
DGR81 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NahHolmes
Joined: 13 Jan 2005 Posts: 598
|
Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2006 4:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Are you joking me really? You actually think this pile of crap is going to fly at a Pro Tour? This deck will scrub out at PT and hard. This deck is like let's hope noone plays aggro.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
snoopster
Joined: 04 Dec 2004 Posts: 739 Location: nj
|
Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2006 6:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| NahHolmes wrote: | Are you joking me really? You actually think this pile of crap is going to fly at a Pro Tour? This deck will scrub out at PT and hard. This deck is like let's hope noone plays aggro.  |
You're right. When two people qualified for the pro tour who have tested the deck a large amount say it's good, there is no way they can be correct, but when you, someone who has never played the deck is his life, say it's horrible you must be right. Test the deck. It can beat aggro, you, just like coolboy, have no clue what you're talking about. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
den18
Joined: 11 Oct 2004 Posts: 387
|
Posted: Wed Feb 22, 2006 5:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Ive actually tested the deck and found it to be quite good. Exaustion is amazing and remand and bounce help save your kamis and crescents from removal. Anyone wanna post thier list. i am too however having trouble with aggro I think Ill have more trouble when guildpact comes out and zoo will be prominent any ideas? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
den18
Joined: 11 Oct 2004 Posts: 387
|
Posted: Wed Feb 22, 2006 6:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Ive actually tested the deck and found it to be quite good. Exaustion is amazing and remand and bounce help save your kamis and crescents from removal. Anyone wanna post thier list. i am too however having trouble with aggro I think Ill have more trouble when guildpact comes out and zoo will be prominent any ideas? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
red_horse
Joined: 05 Nov 2005 Posts: 13
|
Posted: Wed Feb 22, 2006 9:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
i agree with den18, (please see my post in the other owl topic)
this deck can hold aggro with remand, exhaust, boomerang, eye of nowhere, and evac.. as i said in the other topic, a second turn remand followed by exhaustion can stop aggro's tempo.. and if u hav kami crescent in main, hes a 2 drop 1/3, he can hold some attackers for a few turn.. as for the additions for guildpact, im thinking of gigadrowse for delay, or repeal.. and the most important addition is cerebral vortex.. its good with howling mine in play. that would probably hit 4 damage at end of opponents turn if u have howling mine, then impact on ur turn and then watch the owl kill him next turn.. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
blkaznguy4
Joined: 04 Jun 2005 Posts: 82
|
Posted: Wed Feb 22, 2006 11:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I also like the deck ... probably going to find some more superior off colored deck but i jus don't like it considering the field right now is so aggro, sure pyroclasm, exhaust and evac hold them down for a while, but thats also assuming that your holding howling mines and ebony owl on the field. Accomplishing that is only possible with those dam god hands i can never find T.T |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
indie
Joined: 18 Mar 2005 Posts: 71
|
Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2006 6:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
| can someone pls explain to me how the hell can this deck win against any kind of aggro? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|