Magic-League.com Forum Index Magic-League.com
Forums of Magic-League: Free Online tcg playing; casual or tournament play.
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

US Constitution in Grave Danger - Al Gore


Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
Reply to topic    Magic-League.com Forum Index -> Other - Non-Magic
Author Message
PhillipJFry



Joined: 14 Jun 2005
Posts: 34

PostPosted: Thu Jan 19, 2006 8:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

If you are innocent, i.e. have nothing to hide, then who cares if somebody is listning to you? It shouldn't matter.. unless you're doing something you shouldn't be, like planning a terrorism attack.
Back to top
raging_hobo



Joined: 11 Dec 2004
Posts: 80

PostPosted: Thu Jan 19, 2006 8:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

This isn't a matter of if you are ok with it. This is a matter of it being against the law! Honestly, it would only be a mild annoyance for me to find out someone has been spying on my phone calls, but again that's not the point. This all about a blatant disregard for federal law and the supreme arrogance it takes to keep on breaking that law even after having been caught in the act. So you can spout all of your talk about how he's doing it to protect the country and what not, and really that's all well and good. However, it doesn't make it legal and it doesn't make it right.

This has long since ceased being about left and right, democrat and republican. This is about the rights of American citizens and how they are being stripped away by someone who has displayed little more than constant bumbling.

However, since you're ok with it, I will now begin happily listening in on your phone conversations and stalking you. I hope you don't mind people finding out about that dirty little secret, because it's going to be mine soon.

Ciao
Back to top
bahamute



Joined: 29 Jun 2005
Posts: 79

PostPosted: Thu Jan 19, 2006 10:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The easiest way to solve this whole problem if we allowed The Daily Show and The Colbert Report to be our definitive news source. Who knew politics could be fun?
Also, I could care less if the FBi is wiretapping me. I only use the phone twice a month. All of my phone calls are along the lines of:
"Hey"
"Hey"
"You going to the prerelease?"
"Ya"
"Can I get a ride?"
"Sure"
"Later"


"And remember kids, don't fight terrorists, fight bears."
Back to top
Superdood



Joined: 16 Jan 2006
Posts: 273

PostPosted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 12:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

quidam wrote:
Superdood wrote:
quidam wrote:
And not just anyone. He invented the internet.


So you listen to retarded slander? The man never said that, he said he funded the production of it.
So you can't tell sarcasm from a mile away? How unsurprising!


Yes, because you used all the emotional cues via internet to demonstrate sarcasm.

Dipshit.
Back to top
Bejeezus



Joined: 12 Dec 2004
Posts: 1726
Location: Right Here

PostPosted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 3:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

ElvishGod wrote:
Pffft... You guys are such dumbasses and so deluded.

You greatly exaggerate or simply just make up things wrong with Bush. Personally, I think he is a great president. I am not behind him on every topic, but he is still a relatively good president. He should be impeached? For what? How has he hurt this country?!

I notice you're always saying you support Bush and he's a good president, but you never say why...

His wire-tapping and basically spying on the American public is against the law and that alone makes it possible, and don't get me wrong, I'm sure Presidents of the past have done it, but Bush was caught, then ADMITTED to it.

Bush is also assuming WAY more power than he actually has, which obviously creates problems in the balance of power..

What has he done wrong???Pffft WHAT HAS HE DONE RIGHT?!?!
Back to top
Fanboy



Joined: 16 Jun 2005
Posts: 424

PostPosted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 3:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bejeezus wrote:
ElvishGod wrote:
Pffft... You guys are such dumbasses and so deluded.

You greatly exaggerate or simply just make up things wrong with Bush. Personally, I think he is a great president. I am not behind him on every topic, but he is still a relatively good president. He should be impeached? For what? How has he hurt this country?!

I notice you're always saying you support Bush and he's a good president, but you never say why...

His wire-tapping and basically spying on the American public is against the law and that alone makes it possible, and don't get me wrong, I'm sure Presidents of the past have done it, but Bush was caught, then ADMITTED to it.

Bush is also assuming WAY more power than he actually has, which obviously creates problems in the balance of power..

What has he done wrong???Pffft WHAT HAS HE DONE RIGHT?!?!
Hmmmm. Lets weigh the pros and cons of our leader:

Cons:

Likes to blow things up before sending in intelligence, (or using it)

Likes to incorporate religion every now and then in his civil policies (you horrible tax paying homosexuals! Grrr)

Never seems to be around in any of the numerous disasters we've had in his term (except tending to the out of control wildlife on his ranch, priororities people)

He's got stereotypical Texas mentality (sorry, the stereotype isn't exactly a winner. Chuck Norris is your intellectual peak)

Last but not least, regarding his reading levels of reading, I don't think he's capable of reading our own constitution (Hell I'm suprised he can see anything out of those...cold...beady...little...eyes. So cold...)

but lets not forget his pros:

Pros:

Obviously a genius when it comes to saving his own ass (No ones assassinating him any time soon with Dick Cheney in line)

Cares for the people (the republican majority who voted for him [rich white christians with oil investments])

Wont leave America undefended (Unless you account for N. Korea and Iran and the lack of troups to stop them that suddenly dissappeared to Iraq for...well...something)

No ones gonna challenge a man associated with Texas (unless its a spelling bee, yeah then we're pretty boned)

Jesus is on his side! (Not like Jesus was a man of forgiveness that befriended drunks and whores and murderers in order to help them and aide the world by teaching them acceptance of diversity and people will gain strength after realizing there errs, No Jesus kicked those peoples asses! Fuck second chances and evangelizing! Nothing purifies a man better than obliterating him. Just like our good ol' president! Jesus Vs. The Liberals this Friday night at Monster Truck Mayhem VI halftime!!! BE THERE!!!)

Well I think the opinion is obvious. Bush is a genius leader who never lets his friends be bossed around by evil doers that probably had sodomy in a statement of their true hatred for things we like. So don't worry, no ones bombing your rich white republican ass any time soon! Big Boy Bush will stop at nothing to make sure the Democrats taxes pay for your security, comfort, and right as an American privalage to do it all in the safety of a gas guzzling...LOVING!...Hummer H2! Party on Cowboys!
Back to top
Fanboy



Joined: 16 Jun 2005
Posts: 424

PostPosted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 3:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

PhillipJFry wrote:
If you are innocent, i.e. have nothing to hide, then who cares if somebody is listning to you? It shouldn't matter.. unless you're doing something you shouldn't be, like planning a terrorism attack.
I dunno. I'm not sure my mistress would approve of Bush being included in my phone sex. That's wrong. Bastard.
Back to top
Fanboy



Joined: 16 Jun 2005
Posts: 424

PostPosted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 4:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think the solution is obvious. We should allow wire tapping!

Bush can be alerted of incoming terrorist activity and know what's going on in the world of terrorism by tapping my phone.

and

I can be alerted of incoming executive activity and know what the hells actually going on in the White House by tapping his phone.

compromises people, compromises. For America.
Back to top
Koen
Administrator


Joined: 10 Mar 2004
Posts: 336

PostPosted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 4:43 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

PhillipJFry wrote:
If you are innocent, i.e. have nothing to hide, then who cares if somebody is listning to you? It shouldn't matter.. unless you're doing something you shouldn't be, like planning a terrorism attack.


What if you're the Democrat candidate running for president and the current president can wiretap you to find out your campaign strategies? That's the kind of abuse that will be left unpunished if you let Bush get away with this.

Like Al Gore said, this sets a precedent of 'wiretapping allowed' for future presidents. There are many ways to abuse these kind of priviledges. Democracy will not benefit if the president can abuse his powers for his own (politicial) gain.
Back to top
BioMyth



Joined: 02 Sep 2004
Posts: 18
Location: Here and T

PostPosted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 12:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Is it just me or have I heard this kind of story before? Confused
Kinda sounds like starwars and the fall of the republic(which isn't that far fetched).
It seems the states are being "numbed" to the situations at hand, and frankly,
just dont give a fuck anymore!
So to the problem is acualy getting americans(who are sopposed to be ruling THEMSELVES!!) to get up off there cumffy chairs and actuly say something about it(a few seniters[spelling bad] cant do it alone), and if all else fails, GWBush should be out in a few years(cheany is a differant matter Evil or Very Mad )
Back to top
quidam



Joined: 22 Apr 2005
Posts: 194

PostPosted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 1:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Superdood wrote:
quidam wrote:
Superdood wrote:
quidam wrote:
And not just anyone. He invented the internet.


So you listen to retarded slander? The man never said that, he said he funded the production of it.
So you can't tell sarcasm from a mile away? How unsurprising!


Yes, because you used all the emotional cues via internet to demonstrate sarcasm.

Dipshit.
Don't blame me for being a newbie. Anyone with a modicum of experience around here would recognize me as not stupid enough to believe such a thing. You, however, failed to inform yourself on the finer details of the people of the forum, exposing yourself to the risk of missing out on context jokes. Such as the current one.

Way to go, buddyboy.
Back to top
Fanboy



Joined: 16 Jun 2005
Posts: 424

PostPosted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 2:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

actually, we're not even a democracy to begin with. We're a republic. We've never really ever been a democracy for a respected length of time. the true definition is a democratic republic since the masses for for representatives and we have a say if we don't approve (although they can override it)

That's the biggest problem with america. We're so vastly under educated in the proper respects no ones really intelligent to know the obvious reasons why things are fucked up. For instance the liberal conservative debate is actually quite simple dedpite religious beliefs. Here's how it works.

A liberal ONLY means you believe others should be allowed to have diversity, open mindedness, and liberty. Libertarians (i think, if not it should work this way) believe in this so long as it does not directly harm someone with out coherent consent. Conservative ONLY means you believe others should follow a traditional pre set of rules and values, and a good society functions out of conformity versus diversity. The misconception with religion is that they are conservative (because they follow a pre set fo traditional rules). Actually (focusing on the Christain half for now) the book is actually very very liberal since it promotes acceptance and free will. IT's actually a sin to not be accepting and patient for others to eventually convert. IF you get angrya and condemn them your not only chasing away potentials but committing an act of sloth by not bothering to help. Theology aside, basically liberals feel others should have the freedom to do as they want as long as it is not a direct interference and conservatives simply believe people should not have the free will to differ from the norm. Thus conservativism is actually facist, no far stretchs included.

So if we see how America truly operates we are NOT a democracy and we do NOT preech free will and diversity.

As long as wire tapping is allow we're not the America we claim we are, not that we are ever going to be anyways.
Back to top
Superdood



Joined: 16 Jan 2006
Posts: 273

PostPosted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 5:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Fanboy wrote:
actually, we're not even a democracy to begin with. We're a republic. We've never really ever been a democracy for a respected length of time. the true definition is a democratic republic since the masses for for representatives and we have a say if we don't approve (although they can override it)

That's the biggest problem with america. We're so vastly under educated in the proper respects no ones really intelligent to know the obvious reasons why things are fucked up. For instance the liberal conservative debate is actually quite simple dedpite religious beliefs. Here's how it works.

A liberal ONLY means you believe others should be allowed to have diversity, open mindedness, and liberty. Libertarians (i think, if not it should work this way) believe in this so long as it does not directly harm someone with out coherent consent. Conservative ONLY means you believe others should follow a traditional pre set of rules and values, and a good society functions out of conformity versus diversity. The misconception with religion is that they are conservative (because they follow a pre set fo traditional rules). Actually (focusing on the Christain half for now) the book is actually very very liberal since it promotes acceptance and free will. IT's actually a sin to not be accepting and patient for others to eventually convert. IF you get angrya and condemn them your not only chasing away potentials but committing an act of sloth by not bothering to help. Theology aside, basically liberals feel others should have the freedom to do as they want as long as it is not a direct interference and conservatives simply believe people should not have the free will to differ from the norm. Thus conservativism is actually facist, no far stretchs included.

So if we see how America truly operates we are NOT a democracy and we do NOT preech free will and diversity.

As long as wire tapping is allow we're not the America we claim we are, not that we are ever going to be anyways.



By the way, we're not a true democracy or a true republic either. We took the best of both worlds (or we tried to).

Also, you nailed it right on the head, conservatism is trying to head towards facism, but democracy is about flexibility. It's a flexibile system, we shouldn't stay rigid, otherwise NOTHING gets done.
Back to top
Superdood



Joined: 16 Jan 2006
Posts: 273

PostPosted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 5:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

quidam wrote:
Superdood wrote:
quidam wrote:
Superdood wrote:
quidam wrote:
And not just anyone. He invented the internet.


So you listen to retarded slander? The man never said that, he said he funded the production of it.
So you can't tell sarcasm from a mile away? How unsurprising!


Yes, because you used all the emotional cues via internet to demonstrate sarcasm.

Dipshit.
Don't blame me for being a newbie. Anyone with a modicum of experience around here would recognize me as not stupid enough to believe such a thing. You, however, failed to inform yourself on the finer details of the people of the forum, exposing yourself to the risk of missing out on context jokes. Such as the current one.

Way to go, buddyboy.


I surely did 'miss' out. Is that sliver of experience the thing I would have to ascertain in order to decode your razor sharp two by four sarcasm? You my friend are on the edge of sarcasm, wait, no you aren't even near it.

It would be different if you said something like: "Not just anyone but the man who invented the internet, and hippo's!"

That's blatant sarcasm.

"Not just anyone, but he invented the internet."

Since there are no audible cues to sarcasm, it was safe to assume that without prior knowledge to your type of humor that you were being totally serious.

That can be taken two ways: Smart ass remark (very plausible).

Or: Sarcastic remark albeit too subtle to be noticed by anyone else but people who know you.

If you can't comprehend that then I am very sorry.
Back to top
quidam



Joined: 22 Apr 2005
Posts: 194

PostPosted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 6:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Superdood wrote:
I surely did 'miss' out. Is that sliver of experience the thing I would have to ascertain in order to decode your razor sharp two by four sarcasm? You my friend are on the edge of sarcasm, wait, no you aren't even near it.
Hm, the vocabulary was half-decent, the grammar was flawless, the creativity was present but not outrageously impressive. Overall offensiveness was perhaps too low. I'll give it a 7/10.

Quote:
It would be different if you said something like: "Not just anyone but the man who invented the internet, and hippo's!"

That's blatant sarcasm.
That is completely mediocre sarcasm. Adding "hippos" is a total anticlimax, compared to the ideal, straight-faced sarcasm that makes people wonder, but without ever being too serious. Tongue-in-cheek without being flamboyant or ridiculous, that's sarcasm at its best. "Hippos" and such addendums are basically training wheels for the inept reader (or, perhaps, writer), to signal to the world "HEY EVERYONE, THIS IS A JOKE! AIN'T IT HILARIOUS?.

Quote:
"Not just anyone, but he invented the internet."

Since there are no audible cues to sarcasm, it was safe to assume that without prior knowledge to your type of humor that you were being totally serious.
Quite obviously, it wasn't safe. Furthermore, it was wrong. Assumptions made without any information or experience about/with the subject of the assumption are something one should hardly risk making, as they're baseless and quite easy to backfire (such as this one). And to add insult to injury, your response was immediatly aggressive and offensive in tone (rather an the inquisitive tone ideal for those who don't know the territory they're walking).

Quote:
If you can't comprehend that then I am very sorry.
I assure you, pal, that I can comprehend absolutely anything you have the ability to postulate--worry not about that aspect, and more about your own prudence in the way you address people you don't know.

Note: We're striving far too off-topic now. If you feel the need to respond, please do so by the PM system, to keep this topic unlocked and on topic
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Magic-League.com Forum Index -> Other - Non-Magic All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 3 of 4

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Magic: the Gathering Cards

All content on this page may not be reproduced without consent of Magic-League Directors.
Magic the Gathering is TM and copyright Wizards of the Coast, Inc, a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc. All rights reserved.


About Us | Contact Us | Privacy Policy