|
|
| Author |
Message |
SJM
Joined: 17 Apr 2009
Posts: 361
|
 Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 7:58 pm Post subject: Jund with rampant growth |
 |
|
How would this deck look?
So you stick 4 rampant growth in place of putrid leech?
Then what?
Does it run 4 bit blast to take advantage of the acceleration and gain additional card advantage?
2-3 siege gang commander from the sounds of it.
Garruk still in?
Does it deal well with losing 4 sources of permanent damage?
24 land? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SJM
Joined: 17 Apr 2009
Posts: 361
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 8:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Assuming you run 3 dragons and 3 garruk cutting leeches leaves you with 14 creatures/planeswalkers that create creatures.
Doesn't seem sufficient. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SugarShark
Joined: 22 Mar 2009
Posts: 458
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 9:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| leeches are better against decks that don't fight back |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gypsy
Joined: 15 Jun 2007
Posts: 1271
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 9:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| there arent many decks that dont fight back right now |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SJM
Joined: 17 Apr 2009
Posts: 361
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 6:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Crypt and mill being ones that don't fight back. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
miseiler
Joined: 27 Apr 2008
Posts: 23
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SJM
Joined: 17 Apr 2009
Posts: 361
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 7:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
Eh?
I thought it would run 4 bit blast and I had a feeling it would only run 3 rampant growth with 25 land or 4 with 24.
I did not think it ran 4 broodmates and I did not think it cut garruk to zero.
Cynic Kim's deck is interesting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kaamos
Joined: 08 Nov 2006
Posts: 288
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 8:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Worlds are on?
Awesome
Edit: Figures half the decks are Jund |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Deuce
Joined: 06 Oct 2007
Posts: 107
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 11:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Actually 35% not half. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SJM
Joined: 17 Apr 2009
Posts: 361
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 1:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Deuce wrote: | | Actually 35% not half. |
57% of the undefeated decks = Jund.
Odds of the world champion standard deck being Jund are pretty good right now. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
QuaziPance
Joined: 20 Oct 2009
Posts: 54
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 3:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Why does the vampire deck have 56 cards? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kaamos
Joined: 08 Nov 2006
Posts: 288
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 21, 2009 1:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Because vampires suck. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
