|
|
| Author |
Message |
habagat
Joined: 06 Sep 2009
Posts: 12
|
 Posted: Sun Nov 15, 2009 11:32 pm Post subject: GR Rampaging Landfall |
 |
|
Hi there guys Im working on a deck right now I hope you guys can help me on this one..
The idea is a mix of a mana ramp and landfall strategy..
using the landfall to pump the geopede and produce 4/4 beast tokens, after ramping up, use the mana to power-up the fireballs hehehe
Lands
10 forests
3 mountain
4 theramorphic expanse
4 rootbound crag
1 oran-rief the vastwood
creatures:
4 elvish visionary
4 plated geopede
4 llonowar elves
3 rampaging baloth
2 thornling
2 protean hydra
instant:
4 burst
socrcery:
4 fireball
4 rampanth growth
artifact:
4 firewild borderpost
Plains Walkers
3 garruk
2 chandra nalaar
Last edited by habagat on Sun Nov 15, 2009 11:39 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
habagat
Joined: 06 Sep 2009
Posts: 12
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 15, 2009 11:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Suggestions for sideboards on this deck is also needed please help 
my initial sideboard list is
SB:
3 natures spiral
4 goblin ruinblaster
4 acidic slime
4 lightning bolt |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
styx^
Joined: 17 Mar 2005
Posts: 66
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 15, 2009 11:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| fireball? rly?... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jasonx
Joined: 22 Oct 2006
Posts: 2
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 15, 2009 11:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Ok ur first problem is that there are no EXPLODING BORDERS....WTF ur playing a land fall deck there is nothing better than a card that grabs a land and does damage...second fireball isnt ur best choice bro i would go for BANEFIRE so those pesky counterspells wont bother u when u try to kill them....ok third you really should play more stable creatures well thats all i have for now sory hope that helps |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
habagat
Joined: 06 Sep 2009
Posts: 12
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2009 1:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
@styx:
i was thinking fireball so i can split the damage among multiple targets.. 3 damage to nighthawk one damage to hexmage and the rest to the player  since im ramping up mana theoretically ill have enaf mana to eliminate multiple blockers most of the time with one card, and still having an option to fireball for x at my opponent
@jasonx:
ill try to think about wether ill remove rampanth growth and replace it with exploding borders, but i feel a kind of uneasy about exploding borders 4cc
Thank you guys please keep your suggestions comming |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
muskogee
Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Posts: 16
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2009 9:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
i think deck could do some damage like this
land
7 forest
12 mountain
4 valakut the molten pinnacle
spells
4 rampant growth
4 harrow
4 exploding borders
4 lightning bolt
3 expedition map
3 fireball
3 earthquake
creatures
4 plated geopede
4 obsidean fireheart
4 rampaging baloths
Sideboard
not really sure what your meta is so i'll let you decide |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
habagat
Joined: 06 Sep 2009
Posts: 12
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2009 6:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
@muskogee:
Wow thanks I was also kind of torn between rampaging landfall deck or valakut deck but the List you provided gives both  Its a Rampaging Landfall deck and valakut deck in One
Ill immediately give it a try
Thanks
Regarding my meta: I usually go against mid Jund and aggro Mono Black Vampires
Thanks again please keep your ideas comming |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
KnockouT
Joined: 25 May 2005
Posts: 32
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2009 6:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| habagat wrote: | @styx:
i was thinking fireball so i can split the damage among multiple targets.. 3 damage to nighthawk one damage to hexmage and the rest to the player |
You do realize that doesn't work right..?
It needs to be divided evenly, so to kill both a nighthawk, and a hexmage, and hit a player.
you'd need a total of 12 mana.
1 to begin the cast,
9 to split 3 damage to all 3 targets
2 for additional targets.
And for 12 mana you should be doing a lot more than 3 damage to 3 targets.
Banefire > Fireball, by far. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
habagat
Joined: 06 Sep 2009
Posts: 12
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2009 6:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
@KnockouT:
yeah sorry my bad i forgot "evenly". But still ill only need 8 lands to kill 2 nighthawks with just one card
What i like about fireball is its flexibility i really dont worry much about counterspells coz he has a lot of things to worry about like permanents and uncounterable landfall effects which i have
but id still put that inconsideration
Maybe ill add Bane to my SB and some unstable footing
Thanks Guys |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
