|
|
| Author |
Message |
Damondred
Joined: 27 Oct 2009 Posts: 4
|
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 9:41 pm Post subject: Luminarch Ascention |
|
|
This is my Luminarch Ascension deck. I made the deck specifically to go against Vampire decks since that is what I am seeing the most of. Meddling Mage is for locking down any creatures in a Vampire deck, specifically Gatekeeper of Malakir and Bloodghast. Although thats why I have it, it is still useful against most other decks providing I know what they have. I am not too worried about black removal since 12 of my creatures have either Shroud or Protection from Black. The First Strike is useful when blocking since my creatures normally survive. Any advice to improve is appreciated, my budget has no limits although I want to keep it Type 2 and hopefully keep the theme.
16 Creatures
x4 Deft Duelist
x4 Meddling Mage
x4 Wall of Denial
x4 White Knight
24 Spells
x4 Angelsong
x4 Celestial Purge
x4 Honor of the Pure
x4 Luminarch Ascension
x4 Pacifism
x4 Whispersilk Cloak
20 Lands
x6 Island
x6 Plains
x4 Kabira Crossroad
x4 Sejiri Refuge
Possible Additions:
Devout Lightcaster
Hindering Light
Path to Exile
Safe Passage
Ponder
Unsummon
Gwafa Hazid, Profiteer
Last edited by Damondred on Tue Oct 27, 2009 11:57 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DopeLikeYola
Joined: 06 Jul 2009 Posts: 7
|
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 11:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| devout lightcaster? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Damondred
Joined: 27 Oct 2009 Posts: 4
|
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 11:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I ended up taking out the Palace Guard in favor of Angelsong. Devout Lightcaster is a nice card but I am not sure what to remove for her. I am thinking of removing a spell, or maybe adding her to sideboard so I can put her in only when im against Black. White Knight has First Strike, thats why im adding him to mainboard. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gregtron
Joined: 27 Oct 2009 Posts: 7
|
Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 6:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Harm's way vs vampire nighthawk is pretty good |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rafaruggi
Joined: 11 Oct 2006 Posts: 30
|
Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 8:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I would use only 2x Whispersilk Cloak. I'd prefer removal or a creature than Whispersilk most of the times in my hand. Why not Baneslayer Angel? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
darkwizard42
Joined: 02 Sep 2005 Posts: 105
|
Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 12:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
-4 Whispersilk Cloak
+ 4 Baneslayer Angel
-4 Pacifism
+4 Path to Exile
-4 Meddling Mage
+4 Glacial Fortress |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Damondred
Joined: 27 Oct 2009 Posts: 4
|
Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 2:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I am not hurting for mana, but I suppose I can take some basic lands out for Glacial Fortress. I would rather keep the Pacifism though, and Baneslayer Angel doesnt protect itself from removal. Meddling Mage disabled key cards in a deck. I have the Whispersilk Cloak to give them shroud and I can attack with them. Might remove Honor of the Pure. If I do I will probably add some more removal. Path to Exile is nice, but I have it for sideboard to replace Celestial Purge when im not against Red or Black decks. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SugarShark
Joined: 22 Mar 2009 Posts: 457
|
Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 3:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
how about hindering light
and harm's way
cheap, so you can use them with your small creatures
and provide the opportunity for card advantage
as well as protecting your must stick Ascension/baneslayers
I don't mind pacifism |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Damondred
Joined: 27 Oct 2009 Posts: 4
|
Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 4:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Hindering Light is being considered. I think I need another creature though to make up for the Palace Guard. Angelsong has been wonderful in testing the deck so far so I will keep it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|