|
|
| Author |
Message |
Parker2038
Joined: 20 Apr 2009 Posts: 30
|
Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2009 7:38 am Post subject: The true G/W token deck |
|
|
G/W Tokens
\\ Lands (23)
4 [ZEN] Arid Mesa
4 Forest
7 Plains
4 [M10]Sunpetal Grove
4 [ZEN]Verdant Catacombs
\\ Spells (37)
4 [M10] Ajani Goldmane
3 [ZEN] Beastmaster Ascension
2 [ARB] Behemoth Sledge
4 [ZEN] Conqueror's Pledge (=better Cloudgoat Ranger )
4 [ZEN] Emeria Angel (=worse Spectral Procession )
2 [M10] Garruk Wildspeaker
3 [ZEN] Scute Mob
2 [CON] Martial Coup
4 [CON] Noble Hierarch
2 [M10] Overrun
4 [CON] Path to Exile
3 [ALA] Sigil Blessing
\\ Sideboard (15)
SB: 4 [M10] Great Sable Stag
SB: 3 [ZEN] Cobra Trap (maybe this should be on the main)
SB: 3 [ARB] Qasali Pridemage
SB: 2 [M10] Pithing Needle
SB: 3 [CON] Mark of Asylum
Playtesting made so far shows that this deck is quite aggressive.
It can make lots of tokens really fast and then pump FTW, the removal is good too. In term of function is almost the same as the G/W tokens pre-rotation.
Maybe need to rethink the sideboard.
Thanks for your comments 
Last edited by Parker2038 on Mon Oct 12, 2009 10:44 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Parker2038
Joined: 20 Apr 2009 Posts: 30
|
Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2009 8:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
And NO! I'm not putting any Scute Mob in this deck...
EDIT: OK.... I will put SKEWT MAWB!!!
Last edited by Parker2038 on Mon Oct 12, 2009 10:46 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DoomBring3r
Joined: 30 Apr 2009 Posts: 436
|
Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2009 8:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Parker2038 wrote: | | And NO! I'm not putting any Scute Mob in this deck... |
You should, it is good for both your mental and physical well-being. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Verystrait42
Joined: 02 Nov 2005 Posts: 29
|
Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2009 9:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I also agree that Scute Mob needs to be present. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Parker2038
Joined: 20 Apr 2009 Posts: 30
|
Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2009 9:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Verystrait42 wrote: | | I also agree that Scute Mob needs to be present. |
I prefer to leave it outside. This is a token deck. If I was to include Scute Mob, probably I would put in the scute mob for the knotevine paladin... what do you think? better? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Akeldyma
Joined: 05 Jul 2009 Posts: 108
|
Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2009 10:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Skewt Mob needed. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ribbons
Joined: 12 Oct 2008 Posts: 3
|
Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2009 10:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
Remove knotmive paladin, and put mark of asylum in your sb vs pyroclasm or fallouts, also what about 1 or 2 eldrazi monuments??
and yeah this deck need MOAR skewt moabs กกก |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Parker2038
Joined: 20 Apr 2009 Posts: 30
|
Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2009 10:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Ribbons wrote: | Remove knotmive paladin, and put mark of asylum in your sb vs pyroclasm or fallouts, also what about 1 or 2 eldrazi monuments??
and yeah this deck need MOAR skewt moabs กกก |
The mark of asylum is OK but I dont quite like eldrazi monument...
EDIT: Decklist updated! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SJM
Joined: 17 Apr 2009 Posts: 144
|
Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2009 4:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Needs harrow and knight of the reliquary. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
skathe
Joined: 09 Feb 2008 Posts: 22
|
Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2009 5:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
4 arid mesa and no verdant catacomb or misty rainforest? green seems just as important as white here...
harm's way is good with... creatures... i hear...
lotus cobra seems to fit here really well since you're trying to ramp up to lots of tokens.
dauntless escort protects your dudes and isn't jank (looking at you, really really slow sledge) not to mention day of judgment and volcanic fallout exist, and beastmaster ascension gets hit by pridemage, hexmage, and maelstrom pulse, so you need a way to keep your dudes around.
scute mob is good, but baneslayer is better. maybe run them side by side and get rid of bad cards.
and fyi, the main reason mono white and gw tokens was good was because of windbrisk heights giving you super explosive and hard-to-play-around options. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
xSNACKSx
Joined: 20 Jul 2009 Posts: 54
|
Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2009 8:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I tried to play this deck and got diarrhea because it was so bad. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|