U/b wizards

Darrell702 · Joined: 14 May 2008 Posts: 20

Creatures

4x Stonybrook banneret
4x Silvergill Adept
2x Sower of temptation
2x Mistbind Clique
3x Sygg, river cutthroat
3x Spellstutter Sprite
1x Puppeteer Clique

Spells

4x Bitterblossam
4x Cryptic Command
1x Loxodon Warhammer
4x Namless Inversion
4x Sages Dousing

Lands
4x secluded glen
4x sunken ruins
4x mutavault
3x under ground river
6x island
3x swamp

Its a brainstorm that i have to test some more.
If anyones gota good idea that i havent added let me no.
I was stuck on playing either fae or merfolk and I couldnt deside what I liked better so I just thought of how i can mix them up because all the creature types have the similarity of being wizards.
The deck has so much draw and the banneret in play for this deck is like having a blossam in play for fae.
Sages dousing is way better then broken ambitions and almost draws you a card everytime
idk if scion should be in the 75 or not, let me no your opinions

Tird_Ape · Joined: 09 Dec 2006 Posts: 228

seems a lot like a good deck i know..

heres my suggestions
-4 stonbrook
-4 silvergill
-3 sygg
-1 puppeteer clique
-4 nameless inversion
-4 sages dousing
add
+2 mistbind clique
+1 spellstutter sprite
+2 jace belaran
+ 4 scion of oona
+ 4 broken ambitions
+4 agony warp
+ 3 thoughtseize
there ya go

rdeg87 · Joined: 29 Apr 2007 Posts: 277

^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Its true You have to ask yourself how is this better than faeries. I hate to shoot down the deck idea but, What has it got that improves its matches against the metagame.
If you cant find the answer to this just play Faeries.

Darrell702 · Joined: 14 May 2008 Posts: 20

Dude i've been playing Fae for a while, i know what a list looks like
I'm just getting bored of it and want to play something new

Darrell702 · Joined: 14 May 2008 Posts: 20

Well Merfolk already has a slight edge over Fae
so merfolk plus blossam isnt a auto loss agains fae

i think its better cause it plays more dudes and doesnt need blossam to run the whole deck
and the amount of draw in the deck is huge

r3wind · Joined: 24 Jul 2006 Posts: 1254

We have coved this a long time ago.

http://www.magic-league.com/phpBB/about9087.html

http://www.magic-league.com/phpBB/about6593.html

Darrell702 · Joined: 14 May 2008 Posts: 20

lol those lists are crap

r3wind · Joined: 24 Jul 2006 Posts: 1254

Profane Command is not bad with Sygg. Also Loxodon Warhammer has great synergy in this type of deck. I gave you the links to show that the idea has been tried.