|
|
| Author |
Message |
sup3rm4n
Joined: 13 Oct 2006
Posts: 73
|
 Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2009 7:23 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
| why make post about a deck you should beat in extended. sounds like you guys are still butthurt about him winning a trial with his type 2 deck. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Craze
Joined: 30 Jan 2005
Posts: 5675
Location: Indiana, U
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2009 7:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| This is a really retarded thread. Obviously he has won with the deck, why the hell did you need to bring up the issue again here? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JKilla
Joined: 20 Apr 2005
Posts: 92
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2009 8:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Bushviper wrote: | | I think its funny Jkilla tried to post his logs in a seperate post but it got deleated an locked, so he came to a thread with the exact oposite intent on Jkilla and posted his logs of beating Silver. Dude, let it go. |
Actually I was told to post it on this thread by flippi, so thats what I did, and if you can read you will know that I'm just showing the ACTUAL matchup btw naya and burn. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cmc
Joined: 11 Mar 2007
Posts: 38
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2009 8:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Apparently the ACTUAL matchup between 2 decks is shown by 1 match in which one side mulligans 3 times in 2 games. Who knew? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TugaChampion
Joined: 26 Jan 2006
Posts: 566
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 4:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
| NahHolmes wrote: | No I only looked through the first page of your history, I really only looked because you were making such a big deal about knowing the ext metagame I wanted to see what you were playing. Yeah just as I thought though it was all bad luck  , darn those MWS connection issues, usually it's the shuffler that's too blame. [/sarcasm] |
Yeah obv. Actually the connection issues in the last trial I played had nothing to do with MWS but with my internet connection. Some players saw be timing out on mIRC. And the one I said was bad luck as a T2 trial actually. The others I don't remember as I have other things to think about.
Now go worship your hero and stop bothering me. BTW what do Silver's balls taste like? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
NahHolmes
Joined: 13 Jan 2005
Posts: 662
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 5:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I'm not really in it to ride silvers balls, I'm in it to extract your bitter tears. His deck is descent but your banter is priceless. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TugaChampion
Joined: 26 Jan 2006
Posts: 566
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 5:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
| NahHolmes wrote: | | I'm not really in it to ride silvers balls, I'm in it to extract your bitter tears. His deck is descent but your banter is priceless. |
I'm sure you lick silver's balls and you must like it because you have been going at it for a while. And I don't think decks can be "descent". |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jacois
Joined: 05 Sep 2004
Posts: 721
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 8:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
| If you want your gamelogs to be easily read, please delete superfluous information like phase changes and untapping. Try adding a space between turns. It makes the logs readable. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Kev
Joined: 31 Aug 2004
Posts: 99
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 10:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
| THHIS THREAD JUST WENT EPIC |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Trotsky1
Joined: 12 Apr 2005
Posts: 1665
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 06, 2009 4:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Although that is an unusaly high number of mulligans on average it works out for most decks that somewhere in between 20-30% mark normally will be mulligans. So saying testing is invalid because of mulliganing is untrue as it is a major part of the game. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
