|
|
| Author |
Message |
combomaster
Joined: 31 Jul 2008
Posts: 13
|
 Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 3:01 pm Post subject: fellowship of the ring a contender????? |
 |
|
Fellowship of the Ring
by Erik Ryding and Wilhelm Dubber
Creatures [3]
3 Murderous Redcap
Instants [6]
4 Condemn
2 Naya Charm
Sorceries [4]
4 Wrath of God
Enchantments [6]
4 Fertile Ground
2 Oblivion Ring
Artifacts [4]
2 Mind Stone
2 Rings of Brighthearth
Planeswalkers [14]
4 Ajani Vengeant
4 Chandra Nalaar
1 Elspeth, Knight-Errant
4 Garruk Wildspeaker
1 Sarkhan Vol
Lands [23]
2 Battlefield Forge
2 Brushland
3 Fire-Lit Thicket
4 Jungle Shrine
2 Karplusan Forest
3 Reflecting Pool
4 Treetop Village
3 Wooded Bastion
Sideboard:
1 Burrenton Forge-Tender
1 Flameblast Dragon
4 Kitchen Finks
2 Guttural Response
1 Hallowed Burial
1 Oblivion Ring
4 Raking Canopy
1 Relic of Progenitus
-----
The SB needs some serious work and I've already tinkered with the MD a bit. The deck looks promising, and my results so far are quite satisfactory (I decimated WW Kithkin). Can't wait to try it out at FNM or some other tournament
Discuss! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
combomaster
Joined: 31 Jul 2008
Posts: 13
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 3:03 pm Post subject: wub fellowship |
|
|
4 Mind Stone
4 Bitterblossom
2 Terror
2 Remove Soul
3 Cryptic Command
3 Wrath of God
3 Condemn
2 Ajani Goldmane
2 Elspeth, Knight-Errant
3 Liliana Vess
4 Jace Beleren
4 Kitchen Finks
4 Arcane Santum
3 Forbidding Watchtower (yes, really)
1 Vivid Creek
4 Reflecting Pool
4 Mystic Gate
3 Fetid Heath
3 Underground River
2 Caves of Koilos |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
combomaster
Joined: 31 Jul 2008
Posts: 13
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 3:03 pm Post subject: wur fellowship |
|
|
WUR Fellowship
4 Mind Stone
4 Jace Beleren
4 Ajani Vengeant
3 Chandra Nalaar
2 Elspeth, Knight-Errant
3 Cryptic Command
2 Negate
2 Remove Soul
3 Condemn
3 Wrath of God
4 Kitchen Finks
2 Plumeveil
4 Vivid Meadow
4 Vivid Creek
4 Reflecting Pool
3 Mystic Gate
2 Rugged Prairie
2 Cascade Bluffs
2 Shivan Reef
3 Adarkar Wastes |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
combomaster
Joined: 31 Jul 2008
Posts: 13
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 3:04 pm Post subject: gwu fellowship |
|
|
GWU Fellowship
2 Mind Stone
4 Fertile Ground
4 Garruk Wildspeaker
4 Jace Beleren
2 Elspeth Knight-Errant
2 Wrath of God
3 Condemn
4 Bant Charm
4 Cryptic Command
2 Remove Soul
4 Kitchen Finks
2 Cloudthresher
4 Seaside Citadel
4 Treetop Village
3 Flooded Grove
2 Wooded Bastion
2 Mystic Gate
4 Reflecting Pool
2 Yavimaya Coast
2 Adarkar Wastes |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
combomaster
Joined: 31 Jul 2008
Posts: 13
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 3:06 pm Post subject: bgw fellowship |
|
|
BGW Fellowship
4 Fertile Ground
4 Garruk Wildspeaker
2 Ajani Goldmane
2 Elspeth Knight-Errant
3 Liliana Vess
1 Mind Shatter
2 Terror
1 Unmake
4 Bitterblossom
3 Wrath of God
2 Condemn
2 Oblivion Ring
1 Runed Halo
4 Kitchen Finks
1 Cloudthresher
4 Vivid Meadow
4 Treetop Village
4 Reflecting Pool
3 Wooded Bastion
2 Twilight Mire
2 Fetid Heath
3 Caves of Koilos
2 Llanowar Wastes
all of these ideas have come straight from TCG player i was thinking to myself with some tweaks and a gud side this deck could be a contender??? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ZeMuppet
Joined: 20 Dec 2006
Posts: 90
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 4:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Please stop making bad decks...it's embarassing to M-L.
If you want still enjoy posting horrible deck ideas, please go to ****. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Tink903
Joined: 25 Sep 2008
Posts: 36
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 07, 2008 3:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
hey puppet how about you stop making posts just just prove how much of an idiot you really are? As for the decks i would go with the original one with red green white  it seems pretty solid but i would try the mono white ajani for the red matchup its pretty solid with rings out |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Vedrfolner
Joined: 04 Apr 2006
Posts: 1440
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 07, 2008 4:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
| how is gaining 4 life a turn while not winning good against red? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
varno345
Joined: 14 Feb 2007
Posts: 88
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 07, 2008 6:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Even if a fellowship of the rings list wins all the states i won't say it's a good deck... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ajvanadri
Joined: 26 Apr 2006
Posts: 69
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 07, 2008 10:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
| well, its a metagame deck, it does really well agaist control, such as toast and aggro control/midrange like merfolk, fea and elves, but agaist aggro, it just kinda folds...... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
varno345
Joined: 14 Feb 2007
Posts: 88
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 07, 2008 11:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
| yeah so i would play it on the east coast if ur going to states over there cuz they like playing control over there. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
combomaster
Joined: 31 Jul 2008
Posts: 13
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 07, 2008 1:06 pm Post subject: thanks for ur posts |
|
|
| i kown this deck is not the best in standard right now but the whole idea this thread is to try make it better weather u like it or not its almost states worthy just needs tweaking |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
combomaster
Joined: 31 Jul 2008
Posts: 13
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 07, 2008 1:17 pm Post subject: thanks for ur posts |
|
|
| i kown this deck is not the best in standard right now but the whole idea this thread is to try make it better weather u like it or not its almost states worthy just needs tweaking |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Kytep
Joined: 21 May 2006
Posts: 96
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 11, 2008 10:17 am Post subject: Re: thanks for ur posts |
|
|
| combomaster wrote: | | i kown this deck is not the best in standard right now but the whole idea this thread is to try make it better weather u like it or not its almost states worthy just needs tweaking |
Don't let the naysayers get you down; for some reason, many at M-L are amazingly resistant to (afraid of?) creativity. To them, ANYthing that hasn't already been established at a PT (or PTQ) or they haven't thought of themselves "sucks." I'm sure they would slam Necropotence as a "noob card" if its power had not already been established by others.
I've been trying out some Planeswalker-based decks similar to yours, and they're actually not bad. In fact, they can be pretty damn powerful vs. a lot of other decks. It seems that the Planeswalkers can pretty much win games as long as they're protected, usually by blockers. Fortunately, Garruck and Elspeth make their own blockers. And we of course have access to some other great blocker-generators, such as Bitterblossom and Spectral Procession (both of which work really well with Ajani Goldmane as well).
I haven't played vs. RDW/burn yet, but I would imagine it could be problematic, as they can get around the blockers with burn to the Planeswalkers. I'm not sure if Story Circle would help (I'm not sure whether the prevention from Circle or the redirection to the Planeswalker would take priority), but there may be some other good solutions as well (e.g., burn magnets such as True Believer, Mind Shatter, counters?)
I'm not as sold on the Rings though; they seem a bit "win more" to me. I think the other cards in the deck should protect your Planeswalkers, rather than simply double up their effects. If you can't protect them, then the Rings will soon be useless, as there will be no Planeswalkers around on which to use the Rings.
Here is my current list:
// Lands
4 [10E] Brushland
2 [LRW] Vivid Grove
4 [SHM] Wooded Bastion
4 [ALA] Seaside Citadel
2 [SHM] Mystic Gate
4 [SHM] Reflecting Pool
4 [LRW] Vivid Meadow
// Creatures
4 [ALA] Elspeth, Knight-Errant
3 [LRW] Ajani Goldmane
4 [LRW] Garruk Wildspeaker
3 [LRW] Mulldrifter
// Spells
3 [LRW] Oblivion Ring
3 [10E] Condemn
4 [SHM] Spectral Procession
4 [LRW] Fertile Ground
4 [10E] Wrath of God
4 [MOR] Bitterblossom
// Sideboard (work in progress)
SB: 1 [LRW] Oblivion Ring
SB: 1 [10E] Condemn
SB: 4 [SHM] Guttural Response
SB: 4 [LRW] Jace Beleren
SB: 4 [10E] Story Circle
Thanks for the ideas; please keep them up, and again, don't get discouraged. Some of your ideas may pan out; others won't. But remember: Many people here will reject ANYTHING new, whether it's genius or really is "stupid."
Kytep |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Kytep
Joined: 21 May 2006
Posts: 96
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 11, 2008 11:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
| varno345 wrote: | | Even if a fellowship of the rings list wins all the states i won't say it's a good deck... |
I'm curious then: What IS your criteria for saying something is a good deck, if winning all the states - something no deck has ever done in the history of Magic - isn't sufficient?
Kytep
Last edited by Kytep on Tue Nov 11, 2008 12:55 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
