by MitchMachine on 2012-05-28 00:23 CET

Thats what u get if some random dork posts a decklist..

---

by YGDAnthony on 2012-05-28 00:57 CET

The 1st place list was pretty resilient, i won g1, but g2 i had to mull down to 5 and got stuck at 2 lands for quite a few turns, by the time i could do anything i was at 2 life, he draws a Geralf, i die. G3 i get wrecked by a solid hand.

GJ substitute.

---

by lucianoramon on 2012-05-28 02:21 CET

my deck was awesome but I woke up late jejej, I had a Monobrwon, with coetus dragon, wildfire, votaic key, city of traitors

---

by mtgsoldier on 2012-05-28 05:06 CET

bad sets. could not expect better decks to be honest

---

by jfc on 2012-05-28 12:31 CET

^

---

by Counterlife on 2012-05-28 13:26 CET

^^

---

by PeJota on 2012-05-28 18:55 CET

I post the deck is winning thanks but i dont play it and i tester every hours

---

by Weedmonkey on 2012-05-29 01:34 CET

1. The sets are randomized. I don't have any control over what comes out ;)

2. The sets were fine. If you dig a little deeper, there's a lot of good archetypes that were possible

---

by mtgsoldier on 2012-05-29 05:17 CET

Weedmonkey I know, and it is nice that they are ramdom to make people brew more.

PeJota on 2012-05-28 17:55 GMT
I post the deck is winning thanks but i dont play it and i tester every hours

not sure if english or something else

---

by ChristPunchr on 2012-05-29 08:47 CET

Pretty sure that a few sentences have been babelfish translations.

I like how the type-o about covetous dragon looked like it said "coitous' at a glance to me.

Saga, Dark Ascension, Exodus and Invasion are interesting sets for sure. It's okay to just admit that you had no clue how to work with the card pool, versus blaming the cards for your own shortcoming. Magic has been around for a while now- it's okay to not know :P

---

by mtgsoldier on 2012-05-29 13:38 CET

I didnt play my friend, just trolling in the deeeeep

---